Pandemic reveals the sham of human rights industry | Opinion

The largest social experiment in human history has exposed the human rights industry as one of the biggest intellectual shams we have ever witnessed.



Society must permanently move human rights discourse to the realms of comedy or fiction.

The largest social experiment in human history has exposed the human rights industry as one of the biggest intellectual shams we have ever witnessed.

Human rights discourse is the orthodox moral (and increasingly legal) framework that has informed government policy since the UN invented the Universal Declaration of Human Rights 70 years ago.

The Declaration has been the springboard for the creation of countless legal instruments and government bodies. Three Australian jurisdictions (Victoria, Queensland and ACT) have enacted a Bill of Rights and taxpayers are burning millions to prop up the Australian Human Rights Commission.

The human rights industry once enthusiastically trumpeted the need for governments to give individuals a countless range of interests, including the right to privacy and freedom of conscience.

However, now they squander in the corner as our world is pillaged by medical gangsters.

The catastrophe here is that the pandemic has sharpened the ‘collective intellect’ of governments and the broader community, while the ‘rational’ voices have bought the propaganda.

All governments have dealt with COVID in a manner that has totally ignored any appeals to human rights and instead have been guided by only one coherent moral objective: ‘the greater good’.

Every human right, no matter how supposedly “fundamental”, has been summarily swatted away in ‘dealing with COVID’.

The human body was once conventionally regarded as inviolable. “My body, my choice” has for decades been a conversation stopper. At the same time, human rights warriors have been telling us the privacy of health records is an absolute right.

Yet, Australians must now infuse their body with a vaccine or incur suffering in the form of being sacked from work and denied entry to most amenities.

Assertions of fundamental rights by people who don’t want to be vaccinated are dismissively rejected. Moreover, lockdowns have violated our liberty, freedom of association and even freedom to engage in family relationships.

During this brutal assault on the human rights of every Australian, there has not been a whimper from the human rights industry – not even a “save human rights” Twitter hashtag.

The only right exercised is the right of silence.

And it is only getting worse.



The Victorian Public Health and Wellbeing (Pandemic Management) Bill introduced into the Victorian parliament on Tuesday is the most draconian legislation we’ve seen in this country.

It vests supreme unchecked power in one man (Dan Andrews) to detain people, restrict the movement of millions of people and shut businesses indefinitely by simply declaring a pandemic – even if there is not a single case of infection in Victoria.

So, why isn’t the army of human rights lawyers and scholars marching into court to protect the privacy and bodily rights of the vaccine-hesitant and save Australians from some of the longest liberty-denying ordeals on Earth?

There is only one answer. Their industry is illusory; an intellectual scam.

Rights arguments are simply won by the side with the most money or internet followers.

If rights discourse had the sparsest intellectual rigour, it would have provided a pathway for dealing with the myriad conflicting interests presented by the pandemic. Protection of ALL parties.

This would of included the need to protect people, while at the same time recognising the importance of liberty and the need for work and education.

Instead, these organisations have been totally impotent in solving anything.

Two hundred years ago, philosopher Jeremy Bentham declared the concept of human rights “nonsense on stilts”.

A few years later, JS Mill told the world there is ‘no such thing as human rights’.

Perhaps they were right all along.

Humanity was given the illusion of freedom while The Great Revolution was completed.

When the principles of freedom mattered most, they were abandoned by those who reportedly represented them.

It is one thing to think these concepts exist, but if there’s nobody to fight for them and enforce them — where does that leave us?

If a tree falls in the woods and nobody heard it, did it really fall?

This remains the high-water mark of human rights organisations and their co-opted messages.

Now, there is apparently only one evaluative framework that can inform government and individual choices.

One world. One order. No questions asked.

Australians, when faced with COVID, have nearly all become utilitarian.

They disregard the rights of bodily integrity, and privacy of the vaccine-hesitant, because ‘society benefits if we are all vaccinated’.

A distorted moral code where rights are a thing of the past. A dangerous path.

The unmitigated pursuit of the ‘common good’ is the singular ideal that must inform societal choices, according to the new-age religious Scientism fanatics.

It shouldn’t come as a surprise, however. Australia has been ranking increasingly lower on human rights scores in recent years — even being criticised by China for our lockdown responses.

I, for one, would like the right for taxpayers to be free from the self-serving human rights industry.

Charlatans, liars and traitors.

Let history never forget the inactive role these groups have taken.


Rights vs Realities | FFT

Discussion: Government overreach, legal spider web, Census

Mandatory vaccination is a human rights violation. A gross violation

Australia’s poor human rights scorecard revealed

NSW Supreme Court slaps down public health order challenges

Australia: ‘Hate Speech’ is the New Thoughtcrime


For more TOTT News, follow us for exclusive content:

Facebook —

YouTube —

Instagram —

Twitter —

11 comments on “Pandemic reveals the sham of human rights industry | Opinion”

  1. Weak bastards! ‘My body, my choice” landed me in court last Monday, for repeatedly refusing to submit to the fake, invasive, DNA-harvesting nasal rape swab and PCR “test” back in March/April. Well, not quite in court: I refused to don a face nappy, so was excluded from the building, let alone the court. Anyway, I was represented by my lawyers and my case was adjourned until mid-Dec. There were plenty of supporters and TV reporters present, so I “held my own court” outside. Gave them a 20-minute rant covering the fake tests, face nappies and the killer quax. Got reported on the ABC and 7 news that night, but the only bit that survived editing was: “It’s a fraudulent test; I know that because I’m a true scientist, unlike those folk at that Orwellian outfit on Hindmarsh Square” [SA “Health”]. Better than nothing, I suppose. Riccardo Bosi (AustraliaOne), who was also charged with ignoring a “direction” for non-face nappy wearing at Adelaide Airport, adopted a belligerent “common law” approach, and in his phone call from Sydney ended up calling the magistrate “a traitor and an imbecile”. The magistrate said “I’m not putting up with any more of this nonsense” and hung up on him…adjourned till January.

  2. I guess George Carlin was right there is no such things rights, we just made them up like the boogieman! Rights are an idea and just like all ideas don’t expect others will uphold them on your behalf!

  3. An excellent article, and yes, let us never forget their silence. The same applies to the various so-called civil liberties groups across the country.

    Their lethargy and absence on these matters have laid bare their apparent close relationships with the government. Their policies of not wanting to rock the boat have turned these once practical organisations into nothing more than virtue signalling bureaucracies.

    Not that it matters, though, as many grassroots movements have popped up in their place. I think part of the problem lies in institutions such as Human Rights Commissions are only as effective as the demands we place on them.

    Time is running out for people to decide how they want their relationship with authority to look.

  4. The human rights com. R a useless bunch. I filled out discrimination papers against a store refusing me service for not having a mask & they wanted me to show proof of an exemption. They r supposed to know the law, where’s my privacy & rights?

  5. Hallah- bloody- luhyah, someone has finally said it:
    “The largest Social Experiment in human history has exposed; the human rights
    ” Industry “, as one of the biggest intellectual “Shams” ; we have ever witnessed:”

    Absa- bloody- lootly:!! It is said, the first victim in war, is the Truth; no doubt,
    I would suggest, that the absolute obvious of practice of Propaganda: deceit,
    misinformation, and the obfuscation of Hu( colour) man , dignity, the rights,
    as proposed, are a flagrant fraud: and share equal billing in the ” fog of war ” stakes.

    Industry: ! in- deed:

    These, whisperers; who usher forth gushing pronouncements, of the proprietary
    respects , to decency, dignity, the lessons learned from the past, are all false
    Prophets, placatcators, liars, and have not engaged in the historic lessons of
    of man: the antithesis: ” We Do Not Learn From History ” , we repeat it : because
    we forget: that that same criminals, always rise to the top:

    There is no vision, but the ” greater good” is as facile, as it is dangerous; to cover
    a multitude of sins, the implied guilt, you must sacrifice yourself, for others,
    well, sounds like, mind games to me, cause thems who’s creating this ain’t
    giving up ‘ jack’, in fact benefiting, from the greatest transfer of wealth, ever
    seen on this planet, with more of that ‘ common good ‘ on the way:

    We notice though, lots of words , No actions, Silence as was stated, the
    unwillingness of the unwilling, there is no coalition, of the righteous, because
    many of those souls , who have the courage, find themselves alone, with
    the ‘ common good wolves” at the door; to fact check them into oblivion:

    Those who seek to survive, with faint if unrealistic view that ‘normal ‘ will
    some how return; no it will not;
    I think a testament to this is Leunig, his cartoons and social,statements,
    have been with us for decades, but now, his ‘ art of comment ‘ is too
    brutally telling because truth now is’ Silenced’ and the Right to be Human:
    To be a man or a woman, has no definition: .put on your mask, take the
    knee, ……who are you? …….Slave:?

    Thank you , for this article, the ‘ Industry ‘ is right, the exploitation of
    hopium, by these people is farcical, how many know where and what
    Yemen is, how many other excuses are given for the abuse of human
    rights, called murder and genocide, for the greater good, which is then

  6. Firstly well written article Ethan. The greater good or common good is a phrase that has been coined by the Papacy in his Encyclical Laudato Si, which is currently being approved and signed by all the leaders of the world to be soon enshrined into laws against the constitution of every country and against human rights at COP26. There were never “human rights”. This was just a smoke screen and part of the plan just like LGBTQi , Feminism, to name a few, to self-destroy humanity bit by bit and enslave it.

    As to the common good, it will mean that we will all be forced to have a SUN-day of rest or lockdown enforced upon us to care for the “common home”, ( here are these words again ) and because mother earth is angry at the catechumen for breathing too much and apparently destroying the planet, so the 1% tell us.

    The reality is far from what they make it out to be. The 1% with the Papacy at the head, have been destroying this world for their personal gains and have had the audacity to blame the mere mortal trying to about his business of daily living a relatively happy life. They have cleverly used the con-vid-19 plandemic as well as the inoculation as a vehicle to bring in the mark of the beast as outlined in Revelation 13:17.

    But, GOD will destroy those who destroy the earth and their plan will not come to completion just like the Tower of Babel did not come to completion. However each and everyone is currently making a choice of which side they stand on and whether they will accept the mark or not as in the end there will only be two sides.

  7. Yup “human rights” have become like the hospital complaints system – just a way to contain people on the pretence of serving their interests. The obvious argument against “the common good”, that somehow never gets a mention, is its paradoxical, self-defeating nature. There is no common good without indiviudal good. Similarly, there is no public health without individual health. This whole distorsion of ethics into something that can be objectively measured, using bogus metrics like QALYs and scientific outcomes costed against “quality of life” are the convenient pseudoscience of psychopaths. I have never met a medical ethicist who would grasp the true meaning of ethics, since most people with true empathy and compassion but also intelligent enough to articulate it cogently can’t stand to remain in the field.

    1. Happy Days! “Blue Moon, You keep shining on Me, Blue Moon.” Richard Rogers/ Lorenz Hart 1934 origin, I think.
      Very Refreshing! Comment, goes without saying. Goes without saying.
      Was thinking Upon, current/Near Future ‘Medical Restrictions/ Access’, that if THE Western Australian Repression Agency [Passing itself OFF as ‘Government/Authority – Loose Term], is ‘Pressing Forward’ with an EVER CHANGING Vaxx % Ratio, our ‘GROUP’ is going to En Masse Cancel OUR Private Health Subscription/Contributions, & watch THE Systems just PERISH!
      Why, Logically, support A SYSTEM, NOT engaged for BENEFIT OF ALL? WE, are currently Organising to En Masse ‘Queen Mab’ the ‘Flawed Systems’, & a New Genesis of ‘PROPER CARE’, Devoid of the Current Charlatans of Purpose!

  8. Short but simply one of the finest essays to appear during this (new) war, if only because of the plain truth in “Rights arguments are simply won by the side with the most money or internet followers”
    Further it points to the “Enlightenment” itself and its “god” of representative government etc. as a revealed sham.

  9. Bravo Ethan, excellent article and opinion piece.

    I wonder if the UN will continue with their farce of ‘Human Rights’ and call them ‘Trans-Human Rights’ ??

    We pure-bloods will take care of our own because we know what true compassion is – we don’t need the NWO fake ‘rights’.

Leave a Reply