Pfizer approved for 12-15 year olds – important points parents must know

In new developments, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) has approved the Pfizer COVID vaccine for children and adolescents aged 12 to 15 years in Australia.

This is despite the fact nobody in the approved age group has died of COVID in Australia, with children statistically not at risk from any strains of the virus, both domestically or overseas.

[…Continued]

10 comments
Should parents rush to get the jab?
Photo: ALW

VACCINE APPROVED FOR ADOLESCENTS

Australia’s drugs regulator, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), recently approved the Pfizer COVID vaccine for children aged 12 to 15 years across the country.

Pfizer’s vaccine was already approved for children aged 16 and over, and AstraZeneca — while it’s not the preferred vaccine for people under 60 — was initially approved for 18-year-olds and over.

The results have been overturned and the age bracket gets younger and younger.

It is now up to another group, the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI), to decide how and when younger people should get the vaccine.

The national COVID-19 Vaccines Taskforce has already begun planning how to ‘logistically support’ the rollout of the vaccine to children to ‘avoid any delay’.

Greg Hunt, Federal Health Minister, laid out a likely scenario of the rollout:

“What is more likely, on the early advice I have, is that they will fast track vaccines for 12-15-year-olds for the immunocompromised children, or those with underlying health conditions, and then they’ll review the incoming data over the course of the next month on the general population,” he said.

After almost 16 months, we are told new variants of the coronavirus are the reason for this push.

Adolescents must also now be included to help ‘stop the spread’.

However, right off the bat, the narrative begins to contradict itself.

STOPPING THE SPREAD?

Chief Health Officer, Dr Kerry Chant, says it is younger people who were now especially at risk, and this is an important point to remember moving forward.

She says this is because younger people often worked in essential industries such as the food supply chain that continue to operate through lockdowns.

“I am arguing that we need to use Pfizer for those young people to stem the transmission chain because we know that that will provide individual benefit to them and prevent them also from spreading it on,” Chant said.

“What we are seeing is people are bringing it into their household and then infecting their older relatives.”

This is the current narrative driving the approval of vaccines for younger Australians.

Children must ‘play their part’ to protect themselves and vulnerable people around them.

Contradicting previous advice and everything we know about vaccines.

Vaccines as a solution?

Over the last 12 months, we have repeatedly been told vaccines don’t prevent you from catching COVID-19, just the ‘severity’ of the disease to the individual that catches it.

If one is unlikely to avoid infection, even after vaccination, how does a vaccine prevent passing it on?

They will catch the virus anyway.

We know most vaccines don’t fully protect against infection, even if they can block symptoms.

As a result, vaccinated people can unknowingly carry and spread pathogens.

This is why we need to continue lockdowns, they say, even if you are vaccinated.

What does vaccinating children achieve in regards to spread?

80% of coronavirus ‘spikes are happening in the most vaccinated countries anyway, Kerry.

Right away, red flags are raised in regards to intention behind this push.

However, let’s give them the benefit of the doubt for the moment.

Let’s say they forgot that vaccines won’t protect grandma from catching it from a grandchild, and just want to vaccinate children against the dangerous Delta strain.

We have looked at spread, but what about infection itself? Will this ‘reduce symptoms’?

We must ask the question: Are children even at risk to begin from Delta with?

The statistics show us that there is little cause for concern.

DELTA IS NOT A THREAT

We have been bombarded with constant media programming about the Delta strain and all of the havoc that this virus is supposedly causing across Australia.

Examination of the data shows that authorities in Australia are using this ‘crisis’ to unjustifiably vaccinate children with an experimental mRNA vaccine, and calls are not backed by evidence.

Let’s first examine to a place that has been labelled as an ‘epicentre’ on coronavirus cases and deaths — the United States. The Australian media routinely turn to overseas stories to drive the narrative.

The latest data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) suggests the hospitalization rate and risk of severe illness has not been increasing among children:

Data from initial peak of virus.
Note the age box.
Source: CDC
One year later – no change.
Source: CDC
Latest available data.
Amidst Delta ‘fourth wave’ madness.
Source: CDC

Do these statistics look like something we should all be rushing to vaccinate our children over?

To further break down these statistics, let’s turn to the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), which has also identified how children still have a low risk of becoming severely ill from COVID-19.

According to their latest data, as of July 15, 2021:

4,087,916 COVID-19 cases in children have been reported in total.

This is out of 34,400,000 total cases recorded in the U.S. so far.

0.1%-1.9% of these 4 million child cases resulted in hospitalisation.

Taking the highest end of that measurement, this equals 77,670 hospitalisations in 16 months.

CDC data shows that adolescent hospitalisation rates for COVID peaked at 2.1 per 100,000 children in early January 2021, declined to 0.6 in mid-March, and rose to 1.3 in April.

Hospitalisation rate with the normal flu was much higher in 2019-202094.1 per 100,000 children.

Of this 0.1%-1.9% COVID cases in hospital, 0.00%-0.03% resulted in death.

Once again, using the highest end, this equals 23 deaths in total since the pandemic began in the Unites States.

This is being generous to the statistics.

Remember, the U.S. has recorded a total COVID death rate of 610,000 people.

23 deaths out of 610,000.

Or, 0.003% of all COVID deaths attributed to children.

To compare, 166 deaths were recorded in children during the 2019-20 flu season.

This was over a 12 months period, not 16 months.

As we can see, when broken down, this is not even approaching regular flu statistics, and is barely a fraction of the overall populations, if we are to believe the statistics.

In Australia..

In Australia, as opposed to U.S statistics, there is even less of a threat for children.

Nobody in the approved Pfizer age group has died of COVID-19 since the pandemic began.

The average age of COVID-19 deaths in Australia is 85 years – above the age of life expectancy.

As reported on October 20, after the peak of corona deaths in Australia, 73 per cent of those who died with COVID-19 had at least one (and often multiple) other pre-existing comorbidities, death certificate data reported by the Australian Bureau of Statistics showed.

Most kids who suffered adverse effects from COVID-19 had underlying medical conditions:

Once again, we see like the U.S. that the scaremongering is not justified.

To compare once again..

During the 2019 flu season, there was 37 confirmed deaths across New South Wales alone.

Where were cries for (much higher) hospitalisations and deaths of influenza?

Also, was Sydney completely locked down during this period? Were millions thrown into chaos?

Did we unleash experimental vaccines, after rapidly speeding up development times, for the flu?

They say they ‘care’ about children, but what about demand for Kids Helpline rising during COVID-19 pandemic? Do they care about the toll of locking down healthy, not-at-risk children?

How can a virus that didn’t target children for the last year, suddenly now start targeting them?

Even more questions that must be considered.

Logic is Inverted..

The mainstream media will tell you this time is ‘different’ and the Delta strain is contagious — and this is the reason why children in Australia need to be vaccinated.

Even if Delta is ‘more contagious’ — vaccines won’t solve this. We know all vaccines do is force viruses to evolve, not be defeated. Many also become weaker in their process of evolution.

If we know that Delta is not a threat to children, why are we attempting to force more variants?

The threat is overhyped and the solution is questionable at bare minimum (more later).

This isn’t just me talking, folks, listen to the CDC themselves:

Children are spared the severe consequences of COVID-19 and less likely to spread it, and I think that remains true for the Delta variant despite scary headlines,” says Dr. Amesh Adalja, an infectious disease expert and a senior scholar at the Johns Hopkins University Center for Health Security.

“People shouldn’t be surprised about cases, because this virus isn’t going to be eliminated or eradicated.“

According to Adalja, the goal has never been to drive coronavirus cases to zero, in complete contradiction to the suicidal NSW ‘zero COVID’ policy.

“Our goal has been to remove the ability of the virus to cause severe disease, hospitalisation, and death — to tame it,” Adalja said.

Why is Australia focusing on hard lockdowns?

The data is in — stop the panic and end the isolation.

A few additional questions that you should be asking yourself:

Why are we not told the age groups of emerging ‘cases’? Or of ‘deaths’ for that matter?

Why are we not told the severity of these conditions for children if caught?

Has a single child ever died of COVID in Australia?

If children get vaccinated, despite not being at risk and still being able to pass it on to more ‘vulnerable’ individuals, then what is the point of the vaccine?

Again, we are told vaccines don’t prevent you from catching or spreading COVID, just the ‘severity’.

Why are not told the full statistics in comparison to total tests taken?

All of these questions, and more, all ignored to push a coercive vaccine policy.

A vaccine that is likely to cause more harm to Australian children than the ‘virus’ itself.

Advertisements

VACCINES: A POTENTIAL DANGER

In the UK, only high risk children are eligible for Pfizer. In the US, children aged 12 to 15 became eligible for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine on May 10, 2021.

Once again, we are following the greater script and must look to overseas analysis to reveal what could potentially happen when Pfizer is introduced for Australian children.

New warning statements will now be added to Pfizer’s vaccines after a potential link to an increased risk of heart inflammation, particularly among young men, was identified in international data.

The CDC announced they had detected an elevated risk of Myocarditis, particularly for men aged 12 to 29, who received mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna.

The CDC said it had recorded 1226 reports following mRNA vaccination. That amounts to 40.6 cases per million second doses given to males alone.

Myocarditis is inflammation of the heart muscle. A second condition, pericarditis or inflammation of the tissue surrounding the heart, has also been linked to Pfizer’s jab.

“It appears more common in males, more common after dose two, and more common as you get younger,” says Professor Jim Buttery, from the Victorian Immunisation Safety Service.

“Based on fairly limited studies with small numbers of patients, there is definitely a link between the Pfizer vaccine and myocarditis,” said Professor Chris Semsarian, spokesman for the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand.

This is in addition to key (common) side-effects from vaccination, such as fever, chills, muscle pain, fatigue, and pain where the vaccine was administered.

Is this something that you want to risk for your child, given our analysis of the ‘Delta threat’?

When will people realise vaccinations are NOT — and will NEVER BE — the answer?

Did the flu vaccine ever get rid of a constantly mutating flu? No.

Why should we expect the COVID vaccine to do the same?

Why are we giving children, who are not susceptible to serious implications of the virus, jabs for?

As we have explored, the push defies logic and the ‘solution’ should be carefully considered.

TOTT News encourages everyone to become aware of the Epsilon Agenda.

The ages will get younger, as they have already.

This is because they are already planning well beyond vaccines.

To ‘preventative implant measures’ that will help children avoid catching it.

We will be exploring these in future pieces soon.

For now..

Please share with any parents you may know so they can weigh up the information for themselves.


RELATED CONTENT

Australia’s TGA finds Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine is safe for children aged 12 to 15
ABC News

This is why vaccinated people are still testing positive for COVID-19
Fortune

‘Coronavirus spikes’ happening in 80% of most vaccinated countries

COVID-19 Weekly Cases and Deaths per 100,000 Population by Age, Race/Ethnicity, and Sex
CDC.gov

COVID-19 deaths by age group and sex
Australian Department of Health

Heart inflammation warning added to Pfizer jab
Sydney Morning Herald

Epsilon Agenda: The Final Revolution




KEEP UP-TO-DATE

For more TOTT News, follow us for exclusive content:

Facebook — Facebook.com/TOTTNews

YouTube — YouTube.com/TOTTNews

Instagram — Instagram.com/TOTTNews

Twitter — Twitter.com/EthanTOTT


10 comments on “Pfizer approved for 12-15 year olds – important points parents must know”

  1. These injections are experimental…ONLY.. The company cannot be sued, the government cannot be sued if things go wrong. But more importantly , When we , they , have these injections . they make our own immune system weaker. My sister, to my horror has had two shots of AstraZeneca. Nor her doctor is talking about her booster shots. I told her to do proper research . but no. As for the kids, There is speculation about these injections making them sterile. The Gates family have been eugenicists for at least two generations.I do believe Bill and Melinda kids have NOT had the shots. Correct me if I am wrong.
    As a qualified yoga teachers i tell you wearing a mask is detrimental to your health. See how long you can do without air.Our workplaces have strict rules about the quality of air.
    Do not believe a word they say, always double check. Your quality of life depends on it.
    Comeinspinner

    1. Industry in Australia is compelling workers to wear masks while they do physical work, telling those who say NO o take “sick leave” as it is Company Policy. This is bizarre yet Government backed. The spineless Government needs to slip into oblivion and be replaced by those with spines

      1. Same FIFO North of W.A.! & THEY, HSEQs, Should Know the MULTIPLE Negative side Effects/ Consequences of Rebreathing CO2! Enter the ‘Heirarchy of Control’, where under ‘COVID’ [Still got to FIND IT yet] PPE has been Flipped to the ‘First Line of Defence’! { & NONE of THE Masks, Are ‘Fit For Purpose’ – Viral Protection, ZERO. People should ‘Read’ the Manufacturers Supply Information – G.P.Surgical as well.]. 6 Million Masks/Minute used Globally @ one stage, hope THE ‘environmentalists’ are ‘Onboard’ with this ‘Pollution’! As a ‘Duty of Care’ Issue, which we are CONSTANTLY reminded of, Wonder what would happen if there was an ‘Incident’, whilst operating Machinery, or a Vehicle/Heavy Equipment?? Maybe even Psychological Trauma? Safety, Apparently, has NO price! [sic].
        Profit & Loss Units Only, ‘Business’ as Usual, Ably UNSUPPORTED by THE ‘System’.!
        Wellness

    2. Yes the world is literally under a spell. People defy all logical thought. A woman in Australia had several brain operations but still endorses it. Go figure as the yanks say. See thecovidblog.com or healthimpactnews.com

  2. The scum responsible for organising and supporting the scamdemic need to be dragged into the streets and beaten to a pulp!!

  3. The psychopathic scum responsible for organising and supporting the scamdemic need to be dragged into the streets and beaten to a pulp!!

  4. Thank you for presenting a logical assessment. It is perhaps too laborious and detailed for the mindless masses to consume, but by citing the ‘official’ sources like the CDC at least it wont immediately offside them (as we know, if it isn’t from their beloved Government or a trusted brand name they simply cant accept it).

    The logic and justification has been flawed since day one, from the top down. There is no way I will ever be injected with this experimental rubbish for a disease that is so mild. To then think that they will seek to coerce me into letting them experiment on my children becomes an act of hostility and everyone should view it as such and meet it accordingly.

    I note earlier comment saying the Government needs to be replaced with one with a spine. I wish that was plausible but it’s a contradiction in terms. All viable options for Government in this country are the same, puppets of a higher order.

  5. Good one, Ethan, followed by very good comments. Yes, Satanist Anton LaVey, in the form of “Professor” John Skerritt (head of the pHARMa-owned TGA…anyone else notice the resemblance?) is at it again.

    Anyone else seen that video of the NSW Health official a few days ago, discussing the 141 people hospitalized in NSW “for Covid”? Of these, 43 are in intensive care and 28 are under 35 years of age. Right at the end he quietly mentioned (let slip) that 140 of them are “fully vaccinated” (i.e. had submitted to two “jabs”), while the last one has had one. These are NOT COVID “CASES”, folks, they are serious QUAX INJURIES. Yet our quisling “leaders” and their charlatan, pHARMa-owned “health” advisors are doubling down on the need for everyone to “get vaccinated” to “keep everyone safe”. Have you ever seen anything more evil and Orwellian than this??? I have a very brief, simple massage for all of those involved in this atrocity: NUREMBERG 2.

    1. If Folks want a ‘Operational Heads up’ on THE Pharmas P.E.T. warden [THE T.G.A.], take a look @ their Previous Histories, when Dealing with Australian Owned ‘Pan Pharmaceuticals’ – Early/ Mid 90’s. Pan’s ‘Travel sickness pills. As far as I am aware,NO One Died, several reactions to product ONLY![Forgotten name of Product]. TGA Result ; CLASS 1 Recall [NON Voluntary] on ALL Pan’s 1200 + products. Same Period Mercks product VIOXX [heart drug] Killed 60,000 + U.S. Citizens- Result Australian TGA > Class 2 recall [Voluntary Recall] That 1 Product only of Mercks.
      ALL’S FAIR! & You’d think, with the Federal Govt of Australia, blowing a KOOL Quarter of a TRILLION $s on Overpriced U.S./U.K, weapon Systems JUNK, that they could supply a few Sheckles to the TGA, rather than the TGA being ‘Sponsored’ by the ‘Industry’, that they are Suppose to be ‘Overseeing for US!’ Still don’t know HOW, THE TGA, is suppose to ‘Vett’ the ‘Science’ [Or LACK thereof], of these COVID Vaccines’, SORRY!,[Broke out the Dictionary again], ‘BIO Weapon Delivery Platforms’, without ‘Access’ to the ‘Cooking Ingredients’, OR, ACTUALLY DOING, the ‘INDEPENDENT/Sterile/Scientific Isolation SPECIFIC IDENTIFICATION’ of ‘NEW DISEASE’ = SARS-CoV-2 as a ‘Beginner’. . WHERE is the SUCKER?
      Wellness

    2. Do NOT allow your children to have these so-called vaccines. They can be deadly, they can wreck one’s health short and long term. Your kids may end up sterile. Do not take my word for this.DO YOUR RESEARCH. The vaccine suppliers will not pay compensation. Like they could ever pay enough. Also the government will not either. That shows confidence , like hell it does. Why would you trust them ? It is your choice. We all have to make them.

      Comeinspinner

Leave a Reply