AMA Director wants employers to know if staff have been vaccinated

The Australian Medical Association’s Queensland President is calling for a overhaul of privacy laws to give companies the power to see which of their staff have been vaccinated.

The call comes as Australia’s COVID-19 vaccine rollout incrementally continues, hitting roadblocks as public support plummets during the AstraZeneca blot clotting saga.


AMA Queensland President, Chris Perry. Photo: SCD


The Australian Medical Association’s Queensland President wants companies to see which of their staff have been vaccinated, and wants to change laws to do so.

AMA Queensland President, Chris Perry, told Sky News in an interview that vaccination data held in online systems through the Federal Government’s MyGov portal cannot be accessed by employers, even in high-risk industries such as health and aged care. He wants this to change:

“There’s been suggestions that perhaps there should be legislation which could take precedence over privacy,” Dr Perry told Sky News.

“We would all like to see a bit more strength from the government and some legislation around getting the figures, being an employer being able to look at their staff who aren’t vaccinated and work out what they can do about it.

Many public institutions, including hospitals, are not fully aware of how many of their staff have been vaccinated, given they rely on self-disclosure processes which occur on a needs basis and vary between organisations.

“What do you do with someone in an aged care facility who refuses to get a vaccine for no other reason than they’re scared, or they’ve been reading strange science on the internet,” Dr Perry said.

He continues: “They could bring a deadly disease into the community and kill some of the staff, and then the business is liable more than the individual staff member is.”

A deadly disease? Are we still talking about the so-called virus with a 99.97% survival rate?

“It’s a real issue and the government has to look at what they’re going to do about people refusing to have a vaccination in certain industries in the future, including health, including airlines, meatworks, it’s an issue and something we’ve got to think through.

Oh, they are ‘thinking through it’, that’s for sure. This article is yet another example of the slow-PR-push to make the Australian public accept vaccination as a staple requirement for all types of employment. Better yet, that employers should refuse to hire ‘objectors’ as a means of ‘protection’.

Let’s not forget that small business groups have also been calling for workplaces to sack employees who refuse to get a COVID-19 vaccination when one becomes available.

The Council of Small Business Organisations Australia issued a proposal that includes a call to expand ‘No Jab, No Job’ restrictions beyond ‘high-risk workplaces’.

We also heard NSW residents may have to be vaccinated for the coronavirus before they can sit down at their local for a beer, as Premier Berejiklian mulls how to incentivise people to get the jab.

This week (and more recently), the Public Health Association of Australia agrees that it would be beneficial to have clarity around vaccination status, but has raised other methods as a starting point.

PHAA CEO Terry Slevin told Sky News. We’re going to have to set some precedents that we might not be comfortable with, and we’re going to have to work our way through it in good faith.”

Good faith? Give me a break. These clowns wants us to believe there is such thing as a ‘difficult balance’ between individual rights and freedoms, versus collective health outcomes.

The same way ‘security’ was sold to violate fundamental freedoms during the ‘terrorism’ saga.

What happened to all of those terrorists again?

The vaccine agenda is designed to engulf every facet of daily life.

Australia will soon enter an era of mass social coercion.

However, it seems the tide may slowly be turning in the favour of objective reason.


Aussies are abandoning their appointments to get a COVID-19 vaccine following concerns about AstraZeneca’s link to rare blood clots.

Three cases of thrombosis with a low platelet count have been reported in Australia, with one 48-year-old woman dying in a NSW hospital last week. First two covered here.

The decision to offer people under 50 an alternative vaccine to the AstraZeneca shot will impact confidence in the vaccine rollout, which is already plummeting across the country.

Using data from the Melbourne Institute’s fortnightly Taking the Pulse of the Nation (TTPN) survey, researchers have found that the willingness of Australians to get vaccinated has declined substantially from four months ago across all population subgroups.

The percentage of Australians willing to be vaccinated fell from 74.4 per cent in October 2020 to 66.2 per cent in February 2021, a drop of 8.2 percentage points.

This includes those who say they don’t want to be vaccinated (or ‘vaccine refusers’), the proportion of whom has increased from 12 per cent in October 2020 to 19.4 per cent in early February 2021. 

“Despite more information about the vaccine becoming available just over one quarter of Australians aren’t willing or are uncertain about getting the vaccine because of concerns about effectiveness, safety, and side effects.”

A prominent GP in Sydney’s south-west wants more to be done to address the hesitancy, noting his bookings for the AstraZeneca shot plunged 50 per cent in the past week at his clinic.

Jamal Rifi from the Belmore Medical Respiratory Clinic said more options were needed to speed up the rollout because there is nobody to jab in Sydney:

Support has also fallen among readers of The Australian Financial Review in the past month, according to news reports released by the outlet.

Almost one in five (19 per cent) of readers said they would now refuse to take the AstraZeneca vaccine, up from 11 per cent a month earlier.

This is fantastic news to see.

More and more reports, as well as interactions on the street, show perceptions are slowly changing.

National protests get larger and larger each time they happen.

In response to this shift, authorities are now beginning to change their tone.

Alternative vaccines are now on the agenda for Australia.

The government loves and cares for you so much!


Concerns around the rollout were amplified after Scott Morrison announced the AstraZeneca vaccine would no longer be recommended to people under 50 due to forms of blood clots.

Australia will now fast-track two other coronavirus vaccines and order more of each amid recommendations to use other options than AstraZeneca for people under 50.

Pfizer and Moderna are the new products in line for the Australian public, with Pfizer likely first.

So far, more than a million Pfizer vaccines have been imported into Australia, with the government getting a ‘consistent supply’ of about 130,000 doses a week.

We will be doing a feature piece on the dark history of this company shortly.

Could this have been part of the plan all along? Are we witnessing more Orwellian tactics being broadcasted from our ‘trusted’ sources?

Think about this: The government and mainstream media, by ‘addressing concerns’, are showing that they ‘care’ about the public by protecting them.

‘We have switched the vaccine given concerns!’.

Could this be a false trap to lure people in, making the public believe their best interests are at hand, so that greater acceptance will come around when the alternative jabs rollout?

‘We told you the truth for the first jab, now trust us this time around!’.

Is there even really different vaccines out there to begin with? Or is it all just an illusion?

Remember, all vaccines must pass through the ‘COVAX Facility’ before being distributed.

An interesting thought to ponder.

Either way, officials admit the move to switch vaccines could hinder the already delayed rollout.

Informed citizens may hopefully have more time to campaign and continue turning the tide.

To stop the coercive mandating of ALL vaccines, including the soon-to-hit vaccine passports via Medicare and MyGov, and to stand up for individual freedoms and rights for employment.

If this is part of their Orwellian plan — to lure people in with a false sense of security — then we must ensure they never regain the planted doubt back from the public.

What a time to be alive, ladies and gentlemen.

Stay vigilant out there.


For more TOTT News, follow us for exclusive content:

Facebook —

YouTube —

Instagram —

Twitter —

22 comments on “AMA Director wants employers to know if staff have been vaccinated”

  1. For 40+ years Australian gov have used the Milgram psyop to create a culture of order followers now we move into the Stanford prison stage of this Hegelian psyop. Stand your ground.

    1. Thanks for pointing out Milgram experiments conducted which proved people were willing to do anything, even kill, if ordered by a man wearing a white lab coat.

    2. Absabloodylutly:! Mate: Don’t want to play doctor says:!
      They simply can’t deal with anyone who doesn’t believe : the story:
      Its punish; and demands: bully boy tactics: which is really stupid:
      when look at it on face value: They are telling you : they are the enemy:
      We will take your marbles and won’t let you play:! If dont do as we say:
      If we continue: to let the Corporate machine : to make the rules we are
      in real trouble: Got to get the No Consent in writing: get in front of these

  2. Get rid of him and his ilk!

    ‘A prominent GP in Sydney’s south-west wants more to be done to address the hesitancy, noting his bookings for the AstraZeneca shot plunged 50 per cent in the past week at his clinic.

    Jamal Rifi from the Belmore Medical Respiratory Clinic said more options were needed to speed up the rollout because there is nobody to jab in Sydney’.

    Question everything. Doctors, actually spelled ‘doctuers’, a title of nobility, as all titles of nobility, were kicked out of America in the early days; however, kept returning in waves.

  3. ‘Many public institutions, including hospitals, are not fully aware of how many of their staff have been vaccinated, given they rely on self-disclosure processes which occur on a needs basis and vary between organisations.’

    Oh I think public institutions including hospitals have a very good idea of how many of their staff have had this toxic jab.So very many accounts on social media of entire groups of nurses becoming ill after it, some having serious adverse reactions. This is why people who still have a brain cell left and who respect their health will never have this experimental biological injection. We are not all programmed in Australia. Many of us have not watched the propaganda machine for decades. Many of us also are warriors, ready able and willing to fight against all of this tyranny and have been doing so for the past year.

    1. Well said, Lisa! Hopefully the tide can continue to turn!

      Part of me suspects this is why Australia always gets the ‘casual side’ of any international ‘crisis’. It seems, on a per capita basis, that we have more awake people here compared to most countries. Or at least open-minded. But we are very ‘she’ll be right’ in mentality at the same time.

      In this sense, they do their best to note poke the bear as the system sets up. Keep things somewhat level, to not upset anyone completely. The media subsequently feeds the bear as the means of distraction, while the keeper attempts to sneak up.

      Will the bear soon turn around? It is beginning to smell something fishy..


    2. Yes otherwise how did they know who to fire; don’t come back to work next week. I am one of them. 40 yrs exp RN. At home and healthy now.

  4. The AMA is a “charity” but the article and name sounds as if its a government accredited regulation agency….fooling the public once again. What grounds do they have to instigate new laws with an experimental drug that hasn’t even finished its trial period yet?. How could his recommendation even be considered legal? Absolute psy-op from this traitor!

    1. Hi Anna, thank you for your comment. An excellent point to note – the AMA certainly have no powers to do anything, yet remain a large voice in the scientism community. The association does not even regulate or certify doctors! Why are governments listening to them again? Boggles the mind.


  5. Great comments above. What a disgrace the AMA is, a fully bought stooge of pHARMa. And all the covaxxes (actually genetic manipulation devices) are as bad as each other. Anyone wanting this version of the People’s Temple purple kool-ade must be insane!

    My final day of 24-day house arrest [during which time I have been visited by 10 polizei] for refusing to submit to the fraudulent, invasive “covid test” which does not test for any virus, but its false positives are declared “cases” in order to justify “lockdowns” and other covid fascist bullshit. I have put this time to very good use, inter alia, by spreading my anti-covax message around…and have been coaching Alan Jones and Cory Bernardi…both have come out on Sky News very strongly against the disgusting “vaccine passport” idea, and the other night Alan came out solidly against the covax itself.

    At midnight tonight, perhaps I can be like Archbishop Desmond Tutu when apartheid ended in S Africa, and shout “Yippee!” at my new freedom.

    1. Cheers, Graham! Really happy to hear your house arrest ordeal is finally coming to an end! What an absolute farce the whole thing.

      Be careful when you return to society – I hear there’s a killer virus on the loose.. or something like that.. Hmm.


  6. Thanks Ethan, yes this covid nonsense sure is bullshit. Haven’t seen that ad in The Harvey Norman daily (sorry, The Advertiser) featuring the SA Chief Public “Health” Officer with her alluring look and sleeve up for a couple of weeks…perhaps they’re running out of ideas about how to lure folks to their doom?

  7. You know it doesn’t matter what the government calls law anymore they have long since ceased to be a valid entity since at least 1973 when Gough Whitlam unlawfully enacted the Royal Styles and Titles Act 1973 changing the preface of the constitution with the Queen of Australia which has no head of state and removing the Queens right of succession. To quote the former Chief justice of the High Court Sir Harry Talbot Gibbs “I, therefore, have come to the conclusion that the current legal and political system in use in Australia and its State Territories has no basis in law.”

    1. Good point, Nathan. This reminds me, I must buy the book written by Yardley/Gibbs, “Australian Political Leaders’ Treason, Treachery and Sabotage”. Nothing’s changed: look at the current sell-outs to the globalist-parasites: coronahoax and smashing small business; “zero emissions to combat climate change” ; planned privatization of Australia Post (only Christine Holgate held them up for a while)…all of these ripping us off and sucking the life out of Australia’s economy.

    1. Sounds like the AMA: Director: has a very bad dose of; fascistic thrombosis:
      It follows: with the symptoms: of overreach:unmitigated detachment: from
      any standards of moral principles:
      The assumption in the first instance: we are not talking about a vaccine:
      This is a stage 3: trial of an experimental: gene transfaction of a synthetic:
      spike protein: with your friuty: p.e.g. : coated : nano : lipids: to trick your immune
      system: and liberal coating of poly: sorbet 80 : great for poisoning the blood:
      The AMA: Director: wants: is not only in the provence: reckless it is an affront:
      to Human rights: and the lawful Constitution: of this Country:
      This is a tactic: of implantation: of these ideas: into the public domain : a
      psy- op seeding: to cultivate: the fertile: fields of propaganda:
      It needs to remembered: what these people: say: The implications of attaching:
      coercion: contracts if performance: mitigation of Informed Consent: to obtain:
      information: (data) for the commercialisation: by false pretences: or fraudulent
      denial if full disclosure: is a Cime:
      These so called treatments: as per the documentation: provided: by the
      manufacturers: within the Protocols: of Emergency Use Only: ! This is not
      an approval::the application of deception: to contend otherwise: is a crime:
      These treatments: offer no immunity: offers no protection: from oral
      transmission : or from a PCR Test: ( Fraudulent Instrument): positive:results:!
      I would recommend to the Director: be cautioned: that any demand or action;
      that implies further breaches of Privacy: or the Constitutional Guarantees:!
      are not in his best interests:

  8. A good mate recently lost his arm in a motorbike accident .

    He has at least 5 appointments at Royal north shore hospital to see about a new working arm as he was a truck driver his keen to rehabilitate somehow.

    His been told he must have the flu vaccine first then two weeks later the dreaded covid jab otherwise doctors will not see him and it will throw any hopes of a prosthetic arm away should he not take the vaccine.

    sad situation for him , he has no choice

    1. Dear Phoenixrises:
      I am sorry to hear of your mates: unfortunate circumstances: a very traumatic:
      event: losing a limb: it would appear that he is a man of endeavour and courage:
      Now: with his condition: he is Disabled: correct: I will, not give advice: just suggest:
      a mode of enquiry: as to position:
      Disability Discrimination Act: 1992: Section 6: relates to indirect disability discrimination:
      Section 24: relates to Goods: Services: and Facilities:
      Privacy Act: 1988: Section 94:H:
      Constitution Act: 1901: Section 51 (23): Confirmed by Referendum: 1946:
      Constitutional Guarantee:unlawful : Medical Experimental procedures:
      Part 6: UNESCO: Bio- Ethics: states your individual rights:and International:
      Nuremberg Code: Experimental Medical Procedures: Human Experiments:

      There are also under Australian Consumer Laws: : Fair Work Act: 2009:

      It must be remembered: what your friend is being subjected to is Coercion:
      This is Unlawful: Businesses: Facilities: are being deployed by Government:
      These organisations : are acting without oath : or lawful direction:

      They: cannot enforce or direct: or place conditional access: to services:
      to which the public is entitled to receive by the imposition: of a Contract:

      In particular if it involves: your friend: being in a Trial: ( level3)
      Of an Unapproved ; Drug or medical treatment:
      ( Unapproved: Authorised: for : Emergency: Use: Only:)
      The demand: for a performance: or obligation to contract: for services:
      is a Crime furthermore: the ability to provide proof of claim: is required:
      that the implied ‘ use’: is as stated: Full disclosure: Study and study results:
      please: very hard to provide what you do not have:

      Understand: what fully Informed Content: requires: full disclosure: and
      discovery: you must be walked through: what the Trial is: by a suitably:
      qualified practitioner: View the ingredients: the insert: you need a receipt:
      of the batch number: of said medication: any neglect to provide the requested:
      information: equates to no Informed Consent:

      Your friend: must not Consent: to any part of any Contract:
      The Flu- shot: has absolutely no basis in Science or Medical research:
      where is the proof: just another contract:

      With the belief: that the people: manufacturers: Government: Medical
      Institutions: have received exemptions: from prosecution: or actions:
      relating : to the Drugs and the alleged claims of efficacy: safety of same:
      This pertains: the the Drug and its applications:
      These so called exemptions: do not extend to Criminal Law: Personal
      Liability: Discriminatitory behaviour: Fraud: Assault: Utterances:
      Demands by menaces: Criminal negligence: False Contract:

      The remedy is in the details: go take a look:
      To deny treatment: or services: for this type of injury: is not lawful:
      It is perverse: and a blatant crime : to induce human suffering: fail
      in the Duty of Care: for a patient: for an experimental drug : is deeply
      disturbing: any Doctor or medical organisation: who believes : that
      this is justified: is living in another time: 1933 : Germany: S4:
      This is what Nuremberg: was all about:

      Good Hunting: Brother:

Leave a Reply