Unapproved substances to be uncovered?
GMO VACCINE CASE
A Victorian doctor and pharmacist is seeking an injunction from the Federal Court to stop Pfizer and Moderna from distributing their mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.
The plaintiff, Dr. Julian Fidge, alleges that Pfizer and Moderna’s mRNA COVID-19 vaccine products contain genetically modified organisms (GMOs), for which the companies did not obtain the appropriate licence before distributing the products in Australia.
The case was filed in the Federal Court of Australia in Melbourne on the 6th July 2023 and all allegations will be brought under the Gene Technology Act 2000.
In Australia, the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR) is required to approve and license any vaccines being administered in Australia that use GMOs under the Act. This includes mRNA vaccines.
The case alleges that Pfizer and Moderna were “reckless and negligent for failing to apply for the appropriate license from the OGTR before dealing with their mRNA Covid-19 vaccine products in Australia, amounting to a serious criminal offence”.
With reference to the legal definition of GMOs per the Gene Technology Act 2000, it is alleged the GMO components of these products are:
1. The LNP-modRNA complexes; and,
2. Synthetic DNA (modDNA) contamination, also in the form of LNP-modDNA complexes.
The products relevant to the case include both the monovalent and the bivalent COVID-19 vaccines, COMIRNATY (Pfizer) and SPIKEVAX (Moderna).
The plaintiff claims granting of provisional and/or full registration approvals for these products by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) does not cure these serious ongoing criminal offences.
The plaintiff, Dr Fidge, is personally aggrieved, as he has taken the mRNA Covid-19 vaccines himself.
Dr Fidge also allowed his children (eight and eleven years old) to be vaccinated with the mRNA Covid-19 products, formerly practicing as a pharmacist and now practicing as a GP in Wangaratta, Victoria.
Katie Ashby-Koppens of PJ O’Brien & Associates, instructing solicitor, spoke on the case:
“We took this case on because neither of the appropriate regulators were doing anything about it. The Therapeutic Goods Administration and Office of the Gene Technology Regulator were both put on notice in 2022 that these products contain GMOs and they have failed to act,“ she said.
It has been left to citizens to do what the Australian Government won’t do.”
The release continues: “Every single person who has been injected with these products has received a GMO that has not been through the expert regulatory process in this country. The human genome could be changed permanently, and no one was informed.”
A fantastic approach to uncover the truth and an angle that should raise a few eyebrows once it is taken to court and the evidence is examined for all to see.
This case is part of a major wave of pushbacks and breakthroughs against those who not only destroyed Australia’s economic and social fabric, but also harmed citizens in the process.
This case is a unique one, and I for one am a big fan of the approach that is being taken.
Instead of focusing on politicians or departments, this GP is getting straight to the meat of the bone: And is going directly to the manufacturers who have concocted these poitions.
As Dr. T.J. Coles uncovered during his Pfizer Papers series, billions of people were indeed injected with genetically-modified mRNA lipid nanoparticles — all while the human effects remained unknown.
As this plaintiff will attempt to point out in the case, despite a ‘provisional approval’, it was still the responsibility of OGTR to thoroughly investigate the GMO materials contained within.
This is an entirely separate process to the one the TGA scammed the Australian public with.
Now, as we know, indemnity was granted to COVID-19 vaccines manufacturers by the federal government in 2020, but this only pertains to side effects that would occur.
But what about the ingredients themselves and the approval process for them?
This argument could be a completely different approach to things that looks beyond indemnity.
We will have to wait and see how this case plays out and what is revealed.
It comes at a time when Pfizer and Moderna representatives were recently grilled in the Senate, and this case could explain their calculated attempt to stay silent and not answer anything.
Do they know that potentially all you-know-what is about to hit the fan?
The victims of these jabs are also seeking accountability, with an ongoing class action lawsuit organised by Queensland GP Dr. Melissa McCann, which also alleges government negligence and breaches.
Business owners are also currently locked into their own class action lawsuit, with over 1,300 of them in Victoria seeking justice for suffering through the world’s longest COVID-19 lockdowns.
It seems the COVID narrative is completely falling apart now, and this can be seen with even more good news that was announced this week in our backyard.
Queensland’s Chief Health Officer has advised the state government that requirements to have COVID-19 vaccines are no longer needed for staff of Queensland Health and Queensland Ambulance.
The move followed a consultation with staff, unions, patient groups and others, as thousands of individuals have been not able to work for the better part of three years now.
It is great to see such a wave of pushback against these groups and individuals.
As always, TOTT News will be following all of these stories as they continue to unfold!
Thank you for your support of independent media.
For more TOTT News:
Facebook — Facebook.com/TOTTNews
YouTube — YouTube.com/TOTTNews
Instagram — Instagram.com/TOTTNews
Twitter — Twitter.com/EthanTOTT
Bitchute — Bitchute.com/TOTTNews
Gab — Gab.com/TOTTNews