The Pfizer Papers: BioNTech Downplayed Harms of Lipid Nanoparticles
By T.J. Coles
This is part 10 in our series. For parts one to nine, click here.
Pfizer’s partner, the German company BioNTech, published an internal 2,237-page report on its animal experiments.
The report parses phrases, saying things like: there was no “systematic” lipid nanoparticle toxicity detected in the rodents. So, there was toxicity.
In addition, the raw data are not included in the report. Their reference numbers are redacted and, under German law, will be kept secret for 15 years before being destroyed.
Lipids–or fats–naturally constitute cell membranes, regulate cell penetration, store vitamins, aid the production of hormones, and much more.
A nanometre is one-billionth of a metre. Nanoparticles can be organic, like volcanic dust, or human-made, such as carbon tubes. Their dimensions are between one and 100 nanometres.
Since the 1990s, scientists have experimented with modified lipid nanoparticles as a vehicle for novel therapeutics.
The aim is to effectively hide the therapeutics in the lipids, like Trojan horses, so that the body does not reject the therapeutic. Once inside the cell, the therapeutic reproduces and in theory stimulates an immune response.
Messenger RNA (mRNA) mediates between genes and proteins. Antigens are molecules that bind to T-cells and antibodies, and typically trigger an immune response. The Pfizer-BioNTech injectable product is, in theory, an mRNA antigen.
Our bodies are electric. Negatively-charged cell surfaces are called anionic.
mRNA membranes are anionic and thus rejected by cell membranes. The mRNA is thus encased in positively-charged lipid nanoparticles (cationic) that enter the given cell.
As late as mid-2019, just prior to the pandemic, it was understood that “Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) tend to accumulate in the liver.”
The study noting this important fact added: “the mechanisms that promote delivery to other cell types within the liver microenvironment are poorly understood.”
Yet, we are supposed to believe that Pfizer and BioNTech mastered this mystery within months to deliver a safe product.
The Pfizer-BioNTech product uses two types of lipids: PEGylated and phospholipids.
PEG is polyethylene glycol. Pfizer, BioNTech, and governments allowed the experimental, genetically-modified mRNA lipid nanoparticle product to be injected into billions of people worldwide despite PEG causing anaphylactic shock–a severe immune response–in people allergic to PEG.
In addition to PEG, cationic lipids (positively-charged) were widely reported in the pre-COVID literature as being cytotoxic, i.e., toxic to cells, as we shall soon see.
But then governments declared a global pandemic and an apparently necessary rush to rollout an alleged vaccine based, in part, on cationic lipids, and suddenly the toxicity was forgotten.
POSITIVE CHARGE, NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES
Cationic (re)agents are abbreviated (+)NP, as in positively-charged nanoparticles. A study from 2010 said:
“Mice treated with (+)NPs showed increased liver enzyme release and body weight loss compared to mice treated with neutral or negatively charged NPs ((−)NPs), suggesting hepatotoxicity.”
The latter refers to liver toxicity.
Eight years later, the safety of cationic agents was still in question. Lipids are non-viral vectors for gene therapy.
A 2018 study–just a couple of years before the “vaccine” was rolled out–said:
“As effective non-viral vectors …, cationic lipids still have the problem of toxicity, which has become one of the main bottlenecks for their applications.”
Another study from late-‘19, just before the pandemic was announced, said: “cationic reagents are generally cytotoxic.”
The latest document dump contains thousands of pages downplaying the toxicity of lipid nanoparticles, apparently found in the organs of test animals.
The document was approved in September 2020.
BioNTech used 255 Han Wistar rats. Some were injected with failed vaccine candidates, others were injected with what became Comirnaty. Some were injected with a 30 µg dose, others with a 100.
So-called dose exposure is important because, in theory, vaccinologists aim to give the lowest dose with the highest efficacy. But the BioNTech report says from the outset:
“The analysis of dose exposure was conducted under the responsibility of the Sponsor is excluded from this statement.”
So, how do we know what effect the dose exposure had?
PROBLEMS WITH THE REPORT
The first problem is that the report was rewritten at the request of the sponsor, but the report also claims that the rewrites did not make any substantive differences. This suggests a cover-up.
The second problem is that major mistakes were made in the first draft.
This calls into question the accuracy of the second draft:
“…changes for albumin [protein made by the liver] and globulin [immune system-produced protein] levels were incorrectly stated as an increase in albumin and a decrease in globulin plasma levels instead of [vice versa].”
Small activating RNAs are different from mRNAs, yet they interact in ways described as “foggy” just 18 months before the animal trials.
The third problem is that the initial draft confused small activating RNAs with mRNAs.
This is a serious problem if the tests were designed to study the effect of mRNA.
Does this mean that the draft or the actual tests were confused?
The fourth problem was that the vaccine candidates ending in b1 and a1 were mixed up initial tables.
Were the wrong candidates injected into the poor rats or merely reported incorrectly?
Despite being told that the injection was “safe and effective” for humans, the BioNTech report notes that many experimental rats had adverse reactions. But the language minimises the severity.
Depending on the dose number and potency, “a few” rats experienced “severe oedema” (swelling). Others endured erythema (skin inflammation). Some of the animals’ skins had shed (eschar) to the point where the injection site had to be moved for the second and/or third doses.
Some rats suffered muscle death (necrosis) and fibrosis (damaged tissue).
In the females:
“Inflammation extended into tissues adjacent to the injection site, including mammary tissue, perineural [nerve group] tissue of sciatic nerve, tissue around the femur/knee and to the draining lymph node (iliac).”
What appear to be mRNA and small activating RNA–we don’t know which because the original draft was wrong–were present in the rodents:
“Test item-related microscopic findings at the end of dosing were evident in injection sites and surrounding tissues, increased cellularity of germinal centres [structures in white blood cells] and increased plasma cells in the draining (iliac) lymph nodes, bone marrow, spleen, and liver.”
The report casually mentions “enlarged spleens.”
TOXICITY IN HUMANS
People started getting mRNA injections from December 2020. But a study published as late as mid-2022 said:
“The biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of the mRNA-containing lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) in these vaccines are unknown in humans.”
So, for nearly two years, billions of people had been injected, some multiple times, with a novel product whose distribution in their bodies was unknown.
The study also said:
“We found that vaccine-associated synthetic mRNA persists in systemic circulation for at least 2 weeks.”
A recent article investigating myocarditis in adolescents and young people found elevated spike protein in their blood:
“…markedly elevated levels of full-length spike protein …, unbound by antibodies, were detected in the plasma of individuals with postvaccine myocarditis, whereas no free spike was detected in asymptomatic vaccinated control subjects.”
Another studied chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients:
“In 10 of 108 HCV patient samples, full-length or traces of SARS-CoV-2 spike mRNA vaccine sequences were found in blood up to 28 days after COVID-19 vaccination.”
Necrotising encephalitis (swelling) often results in brain lesions. Vasculitis describes blood vessel inflammation.
In October 2022, a study investigated the death of a Parkinson’s Disease patient who had been injected three times.
The first was with the non-mRNA Oxford-AstraZeneca jab, the second and third were with mRNA products. The patient had no history of having COVID-19.
“[H]istopathological analyses of the brain uncovered previously unsuspected findings, including acute vasculitis (predominantly lymphocytic) as well as multifocal necrotizing encephalitis of unknown etiology with pronounced inflammation including glial [central nervous system cells] and lymphocytic reaction.”
Pre-COVID data on lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) suggested that they are toxic to cells and that reducing toxicity is not only difficult but has not been explored in clinical trials.
In addition, it was acknowledged in peer-reviewed medical literature that the distribution of LNPs and mRNA spike protein in humans was not understood.
Despite this, governments approved Pfizer-BioNTech’s injectable product.
The animal trial data suggest that toxicity was downplayed in the published reports.
Even more appalling, the products injected into the animals and the results were mixed up in the first draft, bringing the integrity of the second into serious question. Dose analyses were not even counted.
This had the effect of bringing an experimental product to a captive market under emergency use authorisation, when, in non-pandemic times, such risky products would never have been approved.
Dr. T.J. Coles is the author of several books, including — The War on You.
Check out T.J’s Amazon page by clicking here.
View more TOTT content from Coles here.
For more TOTT News:
Facebook — Facebook.com/TOTTNews
YouTube — YouTube.com/TOTTNews
Instagram — Instagram.com/TOTTNews
Twitter — Twitter.com/EthanTOTT
Bitchute — Bitchute.com/TOTTNews
Gab — Gab.com/TOTTNews
7 thoughts on “The Pfizer Papers: BioNTech Downplayed Harms of Lipid Nanoparticles”
All vaccines are toxic and no proof that any even work. All made just to keep the the elites rich. Detox by using Anthony William the medical medium protocols. We are bombared with chemicals daily and our liver is overworked, no need to add more work for it.
Welcome to the World of CABAL Strategically deployed ‘Cytokine Storms’
A cytokine storm, also called hypercytokinemia, is a physiological reaction in humans and other animals in which the innate immune system causes an uncontrolled and excessive release of pro-inflammatory signaling molecules called cytokines. Normally, cytokines are part of the body’s immune response to infection, but their sudden release in large quantities can cause multisystem organ failure and death.
Cytokine storms can be caused by a number of infectious and non-infectious etiologies, especially viral respiratory infections such as H1N1 influenza, H5N1 influenza, SARS-CoV-1/ SARS-CoV-2, Influenza B, Parainfluenza virus. Other causative agents include the Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, group A streptococcus, and non-infectious conditions such as graft-versus-host disease. The viruses can invade lung epithelial cells and alveolar macrophages to produce viral nucleic acid, which stimulates the infected cells to release cytokines and chemokines, activating macrophages, dendritic cells, and others.
H5N1 has ALREADY BEEN ‘FUTURE WEAPONISED =Gain of Function’ Year 2011!!- See work by Yoshihiro Kawoaka- U.S. Backed Research; Influenza virus – molecular mechanism of interspecies transmission of the virus leading to influenza pandemics in humans; molecular pathogenesis of influenza in poultry (See research using ‘Infected Migratory Birds’ as Long range ‘Viral Deployment platforms’) and mammals. Ebola virus – role of viral proteins in pathogenesis and viral replication.
More ‘Gain of Function Research’ from 2011/12 – Chinese H5N1. Dutch Groups have expanded on H5N1 with Inclusion work on H7N7 Avian bird flu & SARS coronavirus. And German scientists experimenting with K9 Distemper virus to see what it takes to spread IT from dogs to Humans – SICK PUPPIES! = Year 2012/13 = 10 YEARS ago!
SO, ‘IF’ it’s about ‘Public HEALth’, WHY does the U.S. Military (Dept of Defence & DARPA ‘Wet Ware’),Play such a Large part in Proceedings – Including ‘Research Directives & Deployments’ In league with Wuhan ‘Viral institutions’ – Separate to CSIRO Collaborations, OF Course!, U.S..DOD (Come on down to Chapel Hill, Nth Carolina) INSTEAD of the U.S. NIH or CDC. & WHY would the DOD refer to said ‘Vaccines’ as Deployment ‘Counter Measures’?
And Just for Australians; Apart from being completely Illiterate, THE TGA – THE State/ Federal Health Ministers – Prime Minister/Premiers & Cabinets – CMO’s- VAXX Commanders – AMA Collaborators & of course the COMPLETE MS Media Hierarchy OBVIOUSLY, CAN NOT read a Simple Pharma Corporations Safety Data Sheet!!! Moderna Pharma per CONVI 19 Jabs in 2019/20 ‘Stated’ in Plain sight on their SDS near the beginning of Text, under the Subheading COVID-19 Vaccine;
‘There are NO approved COVID- 19 Vaccines that will prevent anyone acquiring, nor prevent Transmission of COVID -19 to others.’ NO ONE that I shared the actual SDS data with, including HSEQ safety personnel, wanted to ‘Know’. – Thank you THE Resource Sector of Australia! = PROFIT IS ALL – ‘The Spice MUST FLOW!’
Back to our Pfizzer/BioNTech BNT162b2 COMIRNATY CONJAB-19.The ‘Above’ Cabal, obviously are Incapable of reading this either! I better add in the Health insurers @ this point as well – do THEY not have ANY Medics/ Co Ordinators/ Stats Collaters perusing ALL Health/ Illness ‘Outfall data’??
Per Attachment A; – BNT162b2 COMIRNATY
Important information for Health Providers & Consumers. – This IS Australia!!
*WARNING; THIS VACCINE MAY CAUSE SERIOUS ILLNESS AND DEATH.
* This vaccine is new and experimental and has not been fully validated for safety or efficacy.
*This vaccine has not been safety-tested for medium term and long term side-effects.
*This vaccine has not been tested for genetic impacts.
*If you are pregnant or breastfeeding, immune compromised, otherwise ill, frail or taking other medications, or an Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander, you should not take this vaccine.
*This vaccine may not prevent infection or give lasting protection from infection.
*This vaccine may not prevent viral transmission.
*This vaccine will not reduce symptoms.
*Before taking this vaccine, you should carefully weigh the risks and benefits against the risks associated with infection, including mortality and morbidity data.
*You should carefully consider whether this vaccine is right for you in all circumstances.
Other; WA.gov.au Home web page. #4; Public Health Act 2016 (WA) – Instrument of Authorisation- Authorisation to Supply or Administer a Poison [SARS-CoV-2(COVID-19) VACCINE-Australian Defence Force] (No.2) 2021.
Page reviewed 10 March 2021.
Definition of a ‘Poison’; A substance Natural or synthetic, Whether Inhaled, Ingested, absorbed or injected into the skin, that can cause Damage to Bloods, Organs, Tissues, Anatomical systems or DNA, down to the Cellular levels, resulting in harm, Illness or Death. – Safe & ‘Effective’.
IS THIS what Folks QUACK Factor ‘Fully Informed’ them per the ‘Dangers’ involved BEFORE ‘Pricking them’??
= I DOUBT IT! Safe & Effective – From the Manufacturers own Text!
Good article, but MIA is the DARPA ‘Wet Ware’ – Electrically ‘Activated’ for Construction/ Destruction.
Please check- ANA MARIA MIHALCEA, MD, PHD for her collaborative works on Nanotech in CONVID jabs (Don’t have link available), But this is some of the research ongoing- Images not included here. Subscribe to her Newsletter;
Comparison Images of Live Blood Analysis and Nanotechnology Coming Out Of The Body With Anti- Nano Devices
ANA MARIA MIHALCEA, MD, PHD
Image: Comparison of a filament exited the body via anti nano tech and live blood analysis of unvaccinated blood
In this post, I wish to share some comparison images of nanotechnology that has exited human bodies via anti nano devices and the live blood analysis of C19 unvaccinated individuals in my office. Many doctors and scientists are denying the presence of nanotechnology that has invaded all of humanity. Since they do, no treatments for the nanotechnology removal is recommended in mainstream medicine.
People need to make up their own mind. I cannot explain what I see in the blood by natural means, neither can I explain the accelerated aging process clearly visible in people. I can explain it in the understanding that humanity is being poisoned by artificial intelligence self assembly nanotechnology and synthetic biology. I do not subscribe to the notion that nothing can be done about this. There are solutions, and the detoxification of these structures by every means available, while supporting the body nutritionally – is important. The more of this technology is in people, the more rapid the symptom development is.
I get feedback from doctors and scientists from all over the world, stating how limited our research is, and what I should do to convince other researchers to have more credibility. Why don’t all of those who have these recommendations for improvement do their own research? Please get a microscope and publish what you find. Why don’t more people look at meat under the microscope? Why don’t others try to find out what they can about the chemical composition of these structures? If people think the self assembly nanotubes are yeast, please do the work to prove they are. That might actually evolve the conversation for the world. We share these findings that are based on our volunteer work so it might alert others. We work to find out what is happening entirely self funded, with limited resources and very limited time. The best thing you – who may be way more qualified then us to do this work – can do for humanity is not educate us but contribute yourself. Go on your own journey of discovery. Maybe the results will shock you into action.
In the following slides, I show images taken from the below linked video explaining what anti nano devices have removed from the body. On the right side I have posted live blood images from my office for comparison.
Image: whitish filament extracted with anti nano device and classic Hydrogel/ Graphene Ribbon in C19 unvaccinated blood
Image: Filament development and microchip connection C19 Pfizer vial Dr. David Nixon
Image: Red and black filament extracted with anti nano device and red Hydrogel/ Graphene Ribbon in C19 unvaccinated blood surrounded by unknown degradation product
Image: Bluish filament extracted with anti nano device and blue Hydrogel/ Graphene Ribbon in C19 unvaccinated blood
Image: C19 Pfizer vial Dr David Nixon. Bluish optical communication between microchips
Image: white filament extracted with anti nano device and white Hydrogel/ Graphene/ CDB structures cultured from in C19 unvaccinated blood
The images were taken from this video below, which shows the many types of nanotechnology extracted.
I have seen how these devices can take the nanotechnology out of the body. Ionizing footbaths work. These devices demonstrated in the video work. I have also seen culture work of what came out of C19 injected people in the water of ionizing foot baths, that are used with different salts, white vinegar, borax and other solutions. The nanotechnology continued to grow outside of the body when cultured. I recommend people use every modality possible to rid themselves of this nanotechnology and synthetic biology. God bless anyone who has a solution to this.
I highly recommend this video. Look at what is being pulled out of people’s body. Whatever your position is, can you explain how this got there? The authors in the video call the ribbons fullerenes. Whatever the name, this looks similar to what I see.
Here is the most recent video by the group “ La Quinta Columna” – please note they found the same filament like structures developing the C19 vials. What I call Hydrogel/ Graphene – they call Graphene Oxide. I do not care what you want to call it until it has been chemically quantified – the point is this does not belong in a vaccine, nor into the human body.
The game is over – La Quinta Columna
Here is the article about Graphene oxide in the Pfizer vials:
BREAKING: Secret Documents published by order of the U.S. Federal Court prove Pfizer, the FDA & Fact Checkers lied when they said Toxic Graphene Oxide was not inside the Covid-19 Vaccines
Here is what I have for a long time been talking about – shedding that in the medical literature has been proven via antibodies.
Vaccine Shedding & Graphene Oxide: Secret Pfizer Documents & Studies prove Graphene is in the COVID Vaccines & Shedding is sadly occurring with Deadly Consequences
This is what Dr. Philippe van Welbergen found in human blood – exactly the same filament structures that I have been finding too, and this structure is shedding to others.
Here is what I have been doing with EDTA Chelation, that happens to work against Graphene, Metals and Hydrogel:
Dr. Ana’s Newsletter
Decontaminating The Blood From Synthetic Biology Hydrogel With EDTA Chelation – Live Blood Documentation
Image courtesy: Case 6. 1 week after treatment. I often am heavily criticized for advocating for EDTA Chelation as a successful modality to clear the blood from this transhumanist assault. Since not many practitioners are doing it or even using Live Blood Analysis, they cannot verify my results. In my practice, many people come from out of town, they sta…
I encourage anyone again, to please do their own research. If you can, contribute to solutions.
Read Dr. Ana’s Newsletter in the app
Listen to posts, join subscriber chats, and never miss an update from Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD.
Get the iOS appGet the Android app
© 2023 Ana Mihalcea, MD, PhD
548 Market Street PMB 72296, San Francisco, CA 94104
EDTA Chelation is extremely interesting & appears advantageous for ‘Bloods’ cleansing per CONVID jabs.
I hope Dr Ana’s info is of much benefit & interest – Wellness as always.
Good one, John Dawe.
Perhaps we should start a competition: What is the most criminal outfit in human history? Entries could include The British East India Company; the inner core/upper echelons of the Jesuits and Freemasons; the global banksters (in particular their Bank for International Settlements and Federal Reserve)…but I would put my money on “big pharmaceutical”, “Big pHARMa”, “Harma”…which of course is an appendage of several of the aforementioned. The sight of Harma CEOs like Bourla, Bancel, Soriot et al elicits a particular disgust that I usually need a punishing run up Mt Lofty to dispel. Interesting, isn’t it, that all of these evil scum are members of “the Khazarian mafia”.
Turning to more agreeable matters, last night I spent an enjoyable evening with the ASO at the Adelaide Town Hall, which featured Berlioz’s “The Corsaire”, the world premiere of Elena Katz-Chernin’s violin concerto (a complex and satisfying work based on a 1920s German vaudeville theme, played well by Emily Sun), and Saint-Saens’ symphony #3. The last was played with such gusto that I thought the lead violin and cello would saw their valuable instruments in half. And the “great beast” of an organ was put through its paces in the final movement. The only negative was the absence of the gorgeous Sharon Grigoryan at second cello, replaced by just a young bloke. A jolly good night out, where I could briefly forget about the current clown show world run by satanists.