The mad scientists and their ‘solutions’.
‘DIMMING THE SUN’
The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) has recently announced a five-year research plan to study solar geoengineering – the most controversial ‘solution’ to ‘climate change’.
According to reports, this program will involve large-scale interventions in our planet’s natural systems, with the aim of blocking the sun’s rays to ‘reduce the current high temperatures’.
According to the White House release, this study would involve a “…scientific assessment of solar and other rapid climate interventions in the context of near-term climate risks and hazards.”
The report shall include:
(1) The definition of goals in relevant areas of scientific research.
(2) Capabilities required to model, analyse, observe, and monitor atmospheric composition.
(3) Climate impacts and the Earth’s radiation budget.
(4) The co-ordination of Federal research and investments to deliver this assessment to manage near-term climate risk and research in climate intervention.
The report will specifically look at solar radiation management, or the spraying of aerosols into the atmosphere to reflect sunlight away from the planet, ‘reducing temperatures’.
The idea became a possibility after the targets for ‘combating climate change’ have fallen short.
In October, a UN report pointed out that current efforts are not enough to limit the increase in temperature to 1.5 degrees Celsius by the end of the century, as established by the Paris Agreement.
Since then, advocates of geoengineering believe that the alternative should at least begin to be considered by the scientific community — and it is.
Geoengineering is coming to save the day from.. missed.. climate data models!
Problem, reaction, solution?
There are many negative impacts of blocking solar rays in the atmosphere shown by studies. The problems even include the possibility of a greater change in climatic conditions.
In addition, the ethical implications of such an undertaking are vast, not to mention the risks associated with meddling with Earth’s atmosphere.
Despite this, geoengineering is becoming a subject of serious study among scientists. They believe the time might have come to understand how such ‘solutions’ might be deployed in the future.
And, as we know, solar geoengineering is just one of many techniques.
NOW GOING MAINSTREAM
‘They wouldn’t be messing with the weather!’.
Even five years ago, people would look at you with a bizarre, confused face if you mentioned geoengineering to them. Now, slowly but surely, this field is beginning to go mainstream.
A web search of geoengineering no longer brings up ‘debunking’ articles completely dismissing the claims as ‘delusional conspiracy’. Oh, how things have changed,
CNBC reported that the research plan is only a “preliminary step” at the moment, “..but it’s notable the White House is formally engaging with what has largely been seen as the stuff of dystopian fantasy.”
The field of dystopian ‘fiction’ is always a blueprint, as we know.
In recent years, several geoengineering plans have been proposed, ranging from building giant mirrors in space to reflect sunlight, to “cloud brightening” involving spraying sea salt crystals into ocean air.
Scientists in Queensland have been spray trillions of these nano-sized salt crystals into the air from a barge to ‘save the Great Barrier Reef’ from ‘climate change’.
In addition to the White House, geoengineering is researched across the world by other research institutions including inquiries of the methods for the Paris Agreement, the Carnegie Council on International Affairs, a UK academic group, the Degrees Initiative, and at Harvard.
They also want to use spraying techniques to “refreeze the poles”.
Cloud seeding remains one of the oldest and most used geoengineering programs across the world, with various techniques employed from both the ground and air to achieve goals.
Cloud seeding has an extensive history in Australia, as we have covered on the website.
Slowly, but surely, as unrealistic and questionable climate targets can’t be met, it is time for a more ‘radical approach’ to solve our problems.
The very White House that bombed Iraq, Libya, Yemen, Somalia, Afghanistan and more for decades are now studying just how they can ‘save us’.
How long before more programs and techniques are given the green light?
For more TOTT News:
Facebook — Facebook.com/TOTTNews
YouTube — YouTube.com/TOTTNews
Instagram — Instagram.com/TOTTNews
Twitter — Twitter.com/EthanTOTT
Bitchute — Bitchute.com/TOTTNews
Gab — Gab.com/TOTTNews