Photo: SMO
The Australian CDC is off and running.
‘ONE HEALTH PROGRAM’
Australia’s newly established Centre for Disease Control (CDC) is placing an ambitious concept at the centre of its early work – “One Health”.
Framed as a “foundational priority”, the approach reflects a growing consensus that the health of humans cannot be separated from the wellbeing of animals and the environment.
The One Health model brings together expertise from medicine, veterinary science, ecology, and public policy to ‘tackle risks that cut across traditional boundaries’.
It marks a shift away from siloed systems, where human health threats are managed largely within hospitals and public health agencies – towards a more integrated framework that seeks to apparently ‘identify and address problems at their source’.
They say this is needed because ‘a significant proportion of emerging infectious diseases are zoonotic’, meaning they originate in animals before spreading to people.
Under the approach, surveillance is broadened beyond human populations. Monitoring animal health, both livestock and wildlife, then becomes a ‘critical early warning system’.
Officials backing the initiative argue that such a shift is overdue.
Environmental indicators, including climate patterns and habitat disruption, are also brought into the picture. By linking these data streams, authorities say they aim to ‘detect unusual patterns sooner’ and ‘respond more effectively’ to potential ‘threats’.
The Australian CDC’s decision to make One Health one of its first major areas of focus signals an intention to re-shape how the country prepares for future ‘crises’.
Rather than reacting to outbreaks after they occur, the emphasis is on ‘prevention, coordination, and resilience’. This includes building systems that allow information to be shared rapidly between agencies that have not always worked closely together, such as agricultural departments, environmental regulators, and health services.
The initiative also aligns with international trends.
Organisations such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FOA) have long promoted One Health principles, especially in response to antimicrobial resistance and emerging pandemics.
In other words, this is about a unified health system approach – and Australia is following.
By embedding the concept early in its development, Australia’s CDC is positioning itself within a broader global movement towards ‘integrated health security’.
However, the approach is not without challenges.
Questions remain about how information will be standardised, how responsibilities will be shared, and how funding will be allocated. There are also practical hurdles in ensuring that surveillance in remote or environmentally sensitive areas is both effective and sustainable.
For Australia, the adoption of One Health as a central pillar of its CDC’s work represents both a policy shift and a statement of intent.
It suggests that future public health efforts will be defined not only by how well the country treats disease, but by how effectively it anticipates and prevents it.
The centralisation of Australia’s health ideology has arrived – driven by a framework that was developed by unelected, offshore corporate entities.
Entities that use organisations like the CDC as puppets while carrying out their true agenda.
AUSTRALIAN CDC RISE
The rise of an Australian-CDC was welcomed as a ‘re-defining moment’ for our health system, as we adopt the same level of oversight that is found in countries like the U.S.
However, just like with those overseas counterparts, Australia risks adopting the same levels of shadiness that are found with said countries – corruption, deception, and manipulation.
How did we get here? In 2022, Anthony Albanese signalled the government would move forward with funding for the new CDC in the October budget, after discussing the facility with state and territory counterparts in a national cabinet meeting.
Australia set to establish national Centre for Disease Control (CDC)
RELATED ARTICLE
In 2024, it was announced that Albanese would invest $251 million to further develop Australia’s Centre for Disease Control, Health Minister Mark Butler announced.
$250 million allocated for Australia’s Centre for Disease Control (CDC)
RELATED ARTICLE
In January 2026, Australia’s CDC was established as a statutory, independent commonwealth authority to oversee national health surveillance, ‘pandemic preparedness’, and public health advice. Professor Zoe Wainer was announced to lead at its helm as Director-General.
“It’s an extraordinary opportunity and investment that the nation’s made to keep Australia safe from public health threats and emergencies,” Wainer noted on her position.
“The role is to ensure that Australia is never surprised by a health threat, never isolated in responding to a health threat, and always contributing to a stronger regional and global public health system.”
The Australian Medical Association has been calling for a CDC since 2017, which it said would have “helped avoid systemic issues exposed by the COVID-19 pandemic”.
As we all know, that is fundamentally a lie.
Organisations like the CDC played a key role in facilitating the COVID scam to the masses, pushing vaccines through with dubious and sometimes fraudulent data underpinning it.
The Pfizer Papers: CDC Approved Jab for Under-5s Against Advice
RELATED FEATURE
Uncovered emails prove CDC Director lied to justify vaccine mandates
RELATED ARTICLE
The AMA believes the Australian CDC body, in similar ways, should provide public advice on areas such as border management and vaccine coordination.
Can we really trust an Australian-style CDC to coordinate future responses?
Let’s also not forget that Anthony Albanese has repeatedly signalled his support for handing over pandemic powers to the World Health Organization.
Controversial WHO ‘Pandemic Agreement’ officially adopted in Geneva
RELATED ARTICLE
Last year, International Health Regulations (IHR) amendments ratified by World Health Organization member states went live, including a ‘pandemic emergency level’ and requirements for a National IHR Authority to co-ordinate implementation of responses.
WHO’s amended International Health Regulations enter into force
RELATED ARTICLE
This is our future when it comes to health, and it has arrived with the Australian CDC and their ambitious first project to transform existing systems to a ‘more rounded’ approach.
No doubt, they will be sticking their noses into much more business moving forward – guided by their masters at WHO and elsewhere.
What are your thoughts on their first project? What role will CDC play in the future?
Let us know your thoughts down below!
KEEP UP-TO-DATE
For more TOTT News:
Facebook — Facebook.com/TOTTNews
YouTube — YouTube.com/TOTTNews
Instagram — Instagram.com/TOTTNews
Twitter — Twitter.com/EthanTOTT
Rumble — Rumble.com/c/TOTTNews
Bitchute — Bitchute.com/channel/TOTTNews
Gab — Gab.com/TOTTNews
Preventing or creating? This is another way of them monitoring everything including the farming activities and next will be pets.
The treasonous bureaucrats and politicians who enabled the installation of this dangerous Harma appendage have not only purloined the great Aussie rock band’s name for their acronym, but also have perverted one of their iconic songs to “It’s a long way to the top unless you sell your soul”.
We need the ACDC like a hole in the head. In keeping with standard Harma deceit, it is based on a false premise in the form of the discredited Germ Theory.
Exactly! Love the ACDC reference.