Watch this space, folks.

---

AGE VERIFICATION ROLLOUT

From this week, age-restricted social media platforms must take reasonable steps to prevent Australians under 16 from having accounts.

Platforms include big services like Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, Reddit, X (Twitter), YouTube, Threads, Twitch and more.

Companies that fail to comply can face civil penalties up to $49.5 million, and many began rolling out small ‘confirm your age’ checks before the deadline anyway.

As part of the laws, platforms must implement ‘age-assurance measures’, such as checking birthdates, facial age estimation tools, ID verification, trusted third-party verification, etc.

But only birthdates have been the focus so far.

Social media companies have not offered the option of government-accredited Digital ID just yet, although they can offer it if they choose.

So why haven’t they yet?

I personally believe we have seen this soft launch of the program because the legal dynamics are not yet finalised, including multiple challenges to the laws now in motion.

For instance, Reddit launched a lawsuit in the High Court of Australia arguing that the restrictions are unconstitutional and should be struck down.

Key legal arguments by Reddit surround how the laws infringe on our implied constitutional freedom of political communication, especially for youths participating in public discourse.

The case was filed in mid-December 2025, shortly after the new law took effect.

Separately, two Australian teenagers – Noah Jones and Macy Neyland – along with a civil advocacy group the Digital Freedom Project, have also filed a High Court challenge.

The challenge also contends the age restrictions violate the implied constitutional freedom of political communication by excluding minors from participating in online discourse.

Their High Court challenge was lodged just weeks before the ban came into force in December 2025, and is part of ongoing litigation now before Australia’s highest court.

These are multiple cases that have arisen either right before, or right after, laws began.

The Senate also recently recommended it be delayed until technical hurdles and concerns are resolved – giving more credence to the suggestion things are not fully activated yet.

Age verification rollout recommended to be delayed by Senate committee
RELATED ARTICLE

If I was with one of these social media companies, I wouldn’t be so quick to go ‘full steam ahead’ on kick-off, pending the results of these cases.

What if these laws do impend freedom of political speech and they are then complicit?

I think they may be holding back to see what is going to happen. The framework is set, and a soft launch is the best way to get people to stop worrying about it.

Maybe I could be wrong, but it seems likely the full picture is not complete when it comes to the laws – both in initial implementation, and in the scope it will encompass.

Social media is only the beginning, too. Don’t forget a separate industry code registered by the eSafety Commissioner will soon require pornographic and other adult content sites to implement age assurance measures by 9 March 2026.

Some age checks for login sessions on search engines may be enforced throughout early 2026 as well, as the range of websites and platforms continues to broaden.

How Age Verification Laws Will Impact Search Engines and Map Apps
RELATED ARTICLE

This will keep growing and expanding, before ultimately tightening.

But this isn’t all happening from the very first day – so just note this, readers.

Even the eSafety Commissioner’s website alludes to the notion that multiple measures may be rolled out over time as the system improves:

This is only the first incarnation of the laws, and even if we don’t have Digital ID requirements on the very first day, doesn’t mean the worst fears aren’t still yet to come.

Once the court cases are finalised, the technicalities finally worked out, and the people conditioned to forget about the laws – then it will strike.

This is because age assurance is a key piece in the larger puzzle of total government control.

THE FUTURE VISION

Since 9/11, the Australian government has had an obsession with expanding our massive domestic and international surveillance network – destroying a free country in the process.

The eSafety Commissioner has been at the forefront of this push in recent years – the same person also responsible for age verification laws.

Before age verification came along, the eSafety office announced that tech giants will be forced to scan emails, online photo libraries, cloud storage accounts, and dating sites of Aussies for “illegal content”, or face fines of nearly $700,000 per day.

eSafety Commissioner will force big tech to scan photos, emails
RELATED ARTICLE

In true ‘Big Brother’ fashion, this department has become an all-seeing, all-knowing censorship bureau – recently ordering videos be removed from circulation in Australia.

eSafety Commissioner orders ban of videos showing Charlie Kirk, Iryna Zarutska murders
RELATED ARTICLE

They say it is about ‘safety’ in the digital realm – but at the core, it is about censorship.

In July 2020, the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade established a taskforce to counter “online disinformation campaigns”, in a bid to further clamp down on social media activities.

Authorities have made it clear time-and-time again that they are targeting free thinkers.

In 2022, Australia signed ‘A Declaration for the Future of the Internet’ in a bid to ‘fight disinformation’ online – joining over 60 other nation states.

Australia joins 60 country pledge to ‘reclaim’ internet, fight ‘disinformation’
RELATED ARTICLE

They have now set up new National Security Investigations (NSI) teams to target groups and individuals causing ‘high levels of harm to Australia’s social cohesion’.

Age verification laws aren’t about ‘protecting children’, it is about mass surveillance. It is not a coincidence that this push comes at the exact same time as the commencement.

Which is the main reason we should continue to keep an eye on it.

A world of online privacy is quickly vanishing in 2026 Australia.

Australian government organisations are 20 times more likely to intercept telephone calls than the United States government. This includes accessing personal data an astonishing 1,200 times per week in 2015, which has no doubt only increased exponentially since then.

They already have full powers to monitor the internet, including private communications.

For example, Australia’s electronic spy agency already has access to a top-secret program that has successfully cracked the encryption used by hundreds of millions of people to protect the privacy of their emails, phone calls and online business transactions.

But here’s the point: This practice, which was already being done behind closed doors, was then made legal and normalised with ‘anti-encryption legislation’ years later.

Australia’s controversial online hacking legislation has passed
RELATED ARTICLE

Social media age verification, and future internet age verification, is just taking the ‘disinformation’ campaigns to new heights in similar ways – legalising and normalising them.

From there, it won’t be too long before some type of ‘social credit’ is linked to everything.

A digital dystopia emerging before our very eyes.

What are your thoughts on the soft launch of these laws? Do you agree with my sentiments?

Be sure to leave your thoughts in the comment section below!

---

---

KEEP UP-TO-DATE

For more TOTT News:

Facebook — Facebook.com/TOTTNews

YouTube — YouTube.com/TOTTNews

Instagram — Instagram.com/TOTTNews

Twitter — Twitter.com/EthanTOTT

Bitchute — Bitchute.com/TOTTNews

Gab — Gab.com/TOTTNews

---

---