Cartoon by Steve Hunter for TOTT News. Photo: Facebook
The Australian government’s claims of safety and efficacy of vaccines are being underpinned by non-objective science provided by an oligarchy of pharmaceutical companies through industry-funded institutions and lobby groups.
In this hostile climate, any citizen questioning vaccination policy is reflexively labelled an ‘anti-vaxxer’ and marginalised or even censored.
The following piece is an ultimate guide to the dangers of vaccines in Australia, including a list of ingredients, studies and medical professionals opposing vaccines, details of the adverse reaction process domestically, Big Pharma’s connections to big business and more.
It is the hottest topic in Australia right now: Should I vaccinate my children?
Dominating television airwaves and newspaper columns for the better part of half a decade now, the debate has evolved to become a daily talking point amongst the general populous in Australia, with an increasing amount of government legislated policies being introduced accordingly as a result.
But when did this topic become so prevalent in Australian society? Where did this begin?
The current vaccine crackdown in Australia began in 2013 when nine local areas were identified by the ‘National Health Performance Authority’ as being “at risk of outbreaks of preventable and potentially deadly diseases” such as measles and chicken pox, with vaccination rates well below the national average of other nations.
As a result of these findings, multiple campaigns have since been launched across Australia to try and improve immunisation statistics, including cutting family tax benefits for families and the very heated ‘No Jab, No Play/Pay’ campaigns launched in 2013.
Despite continued pushes to increase vaccination rates in Australia, the statistics remain steady and the debate still rages on, except now with the addition of a mountain of false information from uncredited websites on both sides of the argument.
Let’s take a look at some of the facts.
The myth that vaccines work is attributed to observations of mammals who recovered from infections with microorganisms that obtained natural immunity from future viruses. Although these observations seem to support vaccinations, raw science reveals that vaccines actually destroy cellular immunity.
Let’s begin by taking a look at one of the most commonly accepted theories in society pertaining to vaccination, and that is, all ingredients used during the immunisation process are safe and the science on vaccines is settled – once and for all!
This couldn’t be further from the truth. Take a look at common ingredients found in vaccinations according to the Australian Immunisation Handbook:
- Aluminium hydroxide and phosphate
- Borax (‘sodium borate’ – causes infertility)
- Polysorbate 80
- Egg protein
- Monosodium glutamate (MSG)
- Thimerosal (50% mercury compound)
- Neomycin, Polymxin, Gentamicin and Kanamycin
Aluminium? Sodium Borate? Mercury compounds? Did you know that these ingredients were active in most common vaccines??
Multitudes of medical doctors and PhD scientists certainly do, and have provided evidence of the harm that vaccines are causing in the population, despite the fact that doctors in Australia can no longer promote their patients best interests in relation to vaccination for fear of being investigated by government medical professional regulators.
In fact, you can find well over 250 evidence-based major studies (compiled now at 450) – including over 150 linking vaccines to autism – that detail some of the lasting effects from a number of vaccine ingredients across the world.
Here is just one example highlighted on the PDF above from the University of British Columbia on toxicity levels of mercury in vaccines for small children:
“In some developed countries, by the time children are 4 to 6 years old, they will have received a total of 126 antigenic compounds along with high amounts of aluminum (Al) adjuvants through routine vaccinations.
According to the US Food and Drug Administration, safety assessments for vaccines have often not included appropriate toxicity studies because vaccines have not been viewed as inherently toxic.
Taken together, these observations raise plausible concerns about the overall safety of current childhood vaccination programs.
Research evidence shows that increasing concerns about current vaccination practices may indeed be warranted.“
These doctors are being described as “rogue practitioners” and their “anti-vaccination material” can now result in de-registration, as was the result with Melbourne GP John Piesse who had the Australian Federal Police raid his offices and suspend his license for signing off on families who didn’t want their children vaccinated.
This is in direct breach of the Medical Board of Australia’s (MBA) good medical practice guidelines for doctors.
This includes research on vaccines that administer toxins for HepB, the common flu, MMR, Gardasil and more.
These studies are relevant to Australia because we use vaccines that are licensed in the US and approved in Australia under a different name without further testing.
T-cells are responsible for cell-mediated immunity, whereas B-cells are responsible for humoral immunity (antibodies). Whenever T- and B-cells are activated by a molecule capable of inducing an immune response known as an antigen, some of these cells become memory cells. As a result, the next time an individual is exposed to the same antigen, the immune system can destroy it quickly.
This is known as ‘immunity’, which gave birth to the belief that if a foreign antigen is injected into someone, then that person is immune from future infections of the same kind. What vaccine proponents fail to recognize is that the respiratory tract of any mammal has Immunoglobulin A (IgA), which plays an essential role in the mucous membrane or mucosa.
In fact, problems are so common with vaccines that regulatory boards and advisory groups have been established to deal with the process of injuries, compensation and even deaths.
One of the largest myths projected into the collective public conscious is that all vaccines are effective and there should be no cause for concern when getting a ‘one-size-fits-all’ routine injection.
Unfortunately, this is quite far from the case in reality, as we are increasingly seeing adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) become a more common occurrence, with thousands of risk assessments entered into appropriate databases each year for public and private access.
Currently, information in the Database of Adverse Event Notifications (DAEN) comes from reports made to the TGA by patients, consumers, health professionals and sponsors of medicines.
The reports in the database start from 1 January 1971 and you can access documents until up to 3 months prior to the date of access, which they use to ‘investigate each adverse event report’.
Since the beginning of the database – based on statistics of 179 different vaccines administered in Australia between 1971 and 2018 – 48,167 reports were submitted detailing multiple adverse events in patients across the country, with the TGA database showing that 32,950 of those cases were likely the result of the single medical intervention (vaccine) itself:
Full report can be read here: daen-report-20180724
A few points to touch on here: Databases serve as statistical hubs for further recommendations and do not serve as technical reports. This is important to remember.
The Australian government currently says that ‘evidence’ associated with adverse reactions to vaccines are not sufficient enough to ‘prove’ conclusively a direct link between vaccines and the reports, despite the fact there is no framework currently to analyse links and events.
Reason for this: In Australia, ‘direct’ links between vaccines and reactions are not legally recognised. This allows the TGA to work off a presumptive and soft legal position, with subversive and broad language designed to disguise the actual direct correlation.
To see an example of an ‘adverse reaction’, please see this story here: Father sues after one-in-a million vaccine reaction. As demonstrated, the vaccine IS the result of the reaction, yet this is not legally recognised in Australia.
This is an industry indemnified against lawsuit for defective or harmful products that uses the presence of language like ‘possible’, ‘likely’ and disclaimers everywhere to cover their tracks.
The TGA’s DAEN exists simply to monitor trends and gather data to send to WHO and other advisory boards for ‘legal analysis’. Something that is blocked at every turn to never upset the ‘legality order’.
These statistics undermine the national and global agenda to continue to expand the vaccine schedule with increasing legislative pressure to remove exemptions and mandate them against the evidence of harm and at best equivocal effectiveness as a preventive health measure.
FOLLOW THE MONEY
This is the perfect catalyst to lead to one of the most important accepts of any debate is the question – Who benefits?
Human health is a fundamental aspect of any free society. The choice to look after yourself and the ones around you is paramount to a modern, developed group of humans.
Despite this sentiment, Australia is home to a powerful network of individuals and business interests that continue to exploit Australian society to their benefit.
Here are two of the most prominent: Lucy Turnbull and Rupert Murdoch.
Mrs Turnbull, the first female lord mayor of Sydney between 2003 and 2004, is the chairwoman of cervical cancer vaccine developer Prima BioMed.
At the end of 2015, company stock traded at 6.2¢ a share, valuing Mrs Turnbull’s more than 20 million shares at $1.2 million.
Malcolm Turnbull continues to be a large proponent of the development of new vaccines to complement the existing schedule, and his wife remains the head of one of the largest biomedical companies relating to vaccines? See the issue here?
Furthermore, the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute – founded by Rupert Murdoch’s mother Dame Elisabeth Murdoch – is heavily involved in vaccinology, including vaccine ‘discovery’, vaccine clinical trials and evaluation, vaccine safety and more.
The Murdoch Children’s Research Institute’s Corporate Partners webpage states that News Corp and Foxtel support this institute.
Many individuals who are concerned with this fact have suggested that the Murdoch family’s association with an institute involved in industry-funded vaccine research and development should be clearly disclosed as a conflict of interest on all articles regarding vaccination published by the Murdoch media group.
This includes The Sunday Telegraph and The Daily Telegraph, both publications that initially launched the ‘No Jab, No Play’ campaign and boasted about their success on public websites.
The media’s continued one-sided and credibility-lacking hit pieces continue to dominate most of the mainstream press in Australia to this day, despite overwhelming evidence of a conflict of interest between those publishing the information and the pharmaceutical companies they serve.
This has led to many concerned citizens taking action.
Many leading and highly-qualified academics have also been ‘discredited’ through deception and spin of the media, including an article published today where Federal Health Minister Greg Hunt called a new anti-vaccination documentary “false and reckless”.
This sentiment was echoed last month as he spoke to Sky News Australia about the continued spread of ‘disinformation’ about vaccines:
“I will be approaching some of the Australian leaders of social media outlets to ask them to take all steps to ensure that dangerous messages about immunisation are clamped down on.”
Furthermore, Dr. Judy Wilyman experienced the full extent of academia’s involvement in the censorship of the vaccination debate in early 2014 whilst completing her PhD at The University of Wollongong (YOW).
During this period, Wilyman would debate Dr. John Cunningham – a specialist in spinal disorders and a leader of the Stop the Australian Vaccination Network (SAVN) pro-vaccine lobby group – in which Cunningham would later chose to send his opinions of the research, with false information, to members of the public, including UOW academics and journalists.
Despite John Cunningham not having any qualifications in public health, immunology or vaccination policy, university policies allow members of the public to influence the credibility of research nonetheless – and this was the case. Why??
Are we going to let this become the new norm? Authorities telling citizens what to do with their own bodies? Even if the concerns are legitimate??
Increases in allergies, anaphylaxis, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS), autoimmune disorders (diabetes, childhood rheumatoid arthritis, arthritis and multiple schlerosis), autism, speech delay, neurological disorders and childhood cancers??
Or will we finally stand up and say – enough is enough!?
Note: We will be adding to this article in the coming days and weeks!
If you are concerned about the dangers of vaccines, we have listed below the characters that are responsible for advising the Australian government on the effectiveness of the product:
The ACV provides ‘independent’ medical and scientific advice to the Minister for Health and the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) on issues relating to the safety, quality and efficacy of vaccines supplied in Australia including issues relating to pre-market assessment, post-market monitoring and safe use in national immunisation programs.
The Committee is established under Regulation 39F of the Therapeutic Goods Regulations 1990 and the members are appointed by the Minister for Health.
Members of the committee:
Professor Allen Cheng – (03) 9903 0325 | Allen.Cheng@monash.edu
Karen Booth – 1300 303 184 | firstname.lastname@example.org
Professor Jim Buttery – (03) 9345 4163 | email@example.com
Professor Michael Gold – (08) 8161 7030 | firstname.lastname@example.org
Professor Paul Johnson – (03) 9496 6676 | email@example.com
Dr Ling Li – (02) 9850 2423 | firstname.lastname@example.org
Professor Kristine Macartney – (02) 9845 1433 | email@example.com
Louise Miller Frost – (08) 8232 2282 | firstname.lastname@example.org
Dr Nicholas Silberstein – (03) 8388 5200 | email@example.com
Dr Lauren Wilson – 0415 526 309 | firstname.lastname@example.org
The other major advisory board is the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI), who advises the Minister for Health on the National Immunisation Program (NIP) and other immunisation issues, such as research for other organisations on current immunisation statistics.
This group is also responsible for advising the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) on vaccine effectiveness and use in Australia.
Other working committees can be found here: https://beta.health.gov.au/resources/publications/atagi-working-parties
Both parties are largely overseen by the Advisory Committee on Medicines (ACM).
For more TOTT News, SUBSCRIBE to the website on the right hand panel for FREE and follow us on social media for more exclusive content:
National Immunization Schedule (NIS) as of 25/07/2018: beta.health.gov.au
Commonly asked questions about vaccination (comprehensive information): immunise.health.gov.au
CDC’s vaccine side effects page: cdc.gov/vaccines