Why would a security agency change these rules?

FBI RECRUITING CHANGES

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is facing scrutiny after revising its recruitment rules to remove several forms of past misconduct from its list of automatic employment disqualifications, prompting questions about the agency’s integrity and security.

The changes, detailed in an internal memorandum dated 16 June 2026 and reported by CBS News last week, concern applicants who have paid for sex, stolen from a previous employer, or engaged in acts involving animals.

Previously, these categories of conduct could automatically prevent candidates from being considered for FBI employment.

Any sane person would assume this is the case, and would remain the case.

However, under the revised criteria, applicants who paid for sex fewer than three times more than a decade ago may be considered, provided they did not do so while occupying a position deemed to involve public trust.

Theft from a former employer is also no longer an automatic bar if the incident occurred more than three years ago.

In addition, past acts of bestiality or animal cruelty are also no longer automatically disqualifying if they occurred before the applicant turned 18.

Yes, you read correctly.

The screening process for the FBI will no longer raise red flags on these issues.

FBI Director Kash Patel defended the revised criteria during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on 15 September, arguing that the agency should not automatically exclude people who had been victims of sexual abuse or human trafficking.

Patel said the changes followed cases in which otherwise qualified candidates had been forced into acts involving animals and subsequently faced rejection under the previous rules. He argued that victims should have an opportunity to be considered for public service without being automatically penalised for their experiences.

Forced into acts of bestiality? Does he mean on Epstein’s Island?

Are former staffers coming to flood the FBI’s office?

Jokes aside, senators questioned whether the revised wording adequately distinguished victims of coercion from people who had voluntarily engaged in the conduct concerned.

Which it doesn’t.

Honestly, what are the odds that an American citizen was somehow forced into an act like this, and also somehow applies to work at the FBI?

I would say the statistics are incredibly low.

What on earth is really going on here?

Republican Senator John Kennedy challenged the rationale for changing the rules, expressing concern about the FBI’s ability to attract and retain trustworthy personnel.

Democratic Senator Dick Durbin also pressed Patel on whether removing the automatic exclusions went beyond protecting victims.

Critics argue that past misconduct involving dishonesty or illegal sexual activity can create vulnerabilities for personnel handling confidential information.

Which is true.

They also warn that individuals who fear exposure of their past behaviour could be susceptible to blackmail, coercion, or other forms of pressure.

Which is also true.

How about the potential consequences of employing people with a history of stealing from employers? Particularly in positions requiring sound judgement and discretion?

In a letter dated 14 September, Senate Judiciary Committee Democrats requested detailed information about the changes, including who approved them, how many applicants had benefited, and whether the FBI had assessed potential risks.

The FBI’s position is that ‘individual circumstances matter’ and that ‘victims should not be unfairly excluded’ – what an absolute joke.

There is quite a lot of ‘monkey business’ going on at the FBI these days under the helm of Kash Patel – the man who said he will see Charlie Kirk in ‘Valhalla’ after ‘catching his killer’ after a 33 hour search. The man who championed Epstein Files being released, only to completely do a 180 and switch his tone once taking his current position.

You may be surprised at how much animals are involved in the ritualistic nature of the elitist parasites, and also their current efforts to normalise this type of behaviour.

Don’t forget that in 2022, a Sydney festival ignited uproar over a talk that explored ‘the ethics of bestiality’, describing sex with animals as “one of society’s last taboos”.

Upcoming bestiality talk at Australian festival sparks controversy
RELATED ARTICLE

Secret societies like Skull and Bones, Bohemian Grove, and those like them, often also use animals as part of the occultic undertones of their gatherings and beliefs.

I would not like to see what is happening at the FBI Christmas Party this year..

Hookers, stealing, and fun times with wildlife – what more could you want from those protecting your nation at the highest levels?

I wonder what J. Edgar Hoover would think?

KEEP UP-TO-DATE

For more TOTT News:

Facebook — Facebook.com/TOTTNews

YouTube — YouTube.com/TOTTNews

Instagram — Instagram.com/TOTTNews

Twitter — Twitter.com/EthanTOTT

Rumble — Rumble.com/c/TOTTNews

Bitchute — Bitchute.com/TOTTNews

Gab — Gab.com/TOTTNews