
Photo: XML
How safe are the tools of the medical industry?
DEVICE SAFETY
Concerns are growing over Australia’s system for monitoring medical devices after questions were raised about whether patients and the public have enough information about device-related injuries, recalls, and safety risks.
A recent editorial by The Sydney Morning Herald argued that Australia’s medical device regime requires stronger oversight and greater transparency.

The newspaper highlighted the scale of medical device use in Australia and warned that, while many devices provide some benefits, failures can have serious consequences.
The discussion followed news that more than 150,000 incidents involving medical devices require hospital each year, according to the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
The figure has drawn attention to the importance of understanding how medical device problems are identified, reported, and addressed.
Medical devices in question range from simple tools used in healthcare settings to complex technologies such as implants, surgical equipment and diagnostic systems.

Unlike medicines, where it is at least assumed they are being assessed through large clinical trials before approval, device risks only become apparent after a product has been used.
The central concern raised by critics is that problems may not always be detected or communicated quickly enough, arguing for stronger post-market surveillance – including the monitoring of devices after they are approved and in use.
Patients should have clearer access to information about adverse events, safety warnings, recalls, and trends involving medical devices. But, sadly, many don’t.
The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), Australia’s medical products regulator, say they already carry out monitoring and recall activities for medical devices.

But can the TGA really be trusted?
I think the COVID period told us everything we need to know about that.
Another layer of the story is the fact Australia relies heavily on reports from manufacturers and healthcare providers, leaving gaps if incidents are not consistently reported.
Where else have we seen this type of underreporting occur?
Regulators across around the world have faced similar questions about ensuring devices are monitored after approval, particularly as technology advances and products evolve.

Recent debates overseas have also focused on improving data collection, strengthening reporting requirements, and making safety information easier for the public to access.
People put so much trust into authority figures to the point it blinds them from common sense – to see who is developing it, and whether or not it is safe.
This is the story of the medical industry itself – a generations-old scam that has synthesised nature, labelled reality as fiction, and caused more damage to humans than anything else.
THE MEDICAL HOAX
Time and time again, we see the profession of medicine – and the ‘experts’ of Scientism that power the jargon behind it – fall flat on its face with scandal, corruption, and deception.
How many times have we seen stories of medical devices causing harm alone?
Last year, the TGA was forced to warn pregnant women against using popular portable foetal heart monitors, after multiple baby deaths were linked to the devices.
Baby deaths associated with home-use foetal heart monitors
RELATED ARTICLE
Furthermore, who can forget the bombshell study that warned CT scans performed in the U.S in 2023 alone could eventually lead to over 100,000 extra cancer cases?
CT scans could be triggering an alarming number of cancer cases
RELATED ARTICLE
These are just a few examples.
Why do people continue to trust these devices?
Especially considering the widespread corruption involved across the industry.
Australian medical ‘professionals’ collected over $11 million in payments from drug companies in 2022 alone. In many cases, these payments were not declared.
“Widespread”: Australian medical researchers fail to declare conflicts of interest
RELATED ARTICLE
How many doctors are sponsored by the makers of these devices?
How many turn a blind eye because they know they are cashing in?
Meanwhile, instead of addressing concerns, we see our hospital system descending further into cultural marxist ideology and cult-like adherence to the Priests of Scientism.
Logan Hospital introduces ‘diverse mannequins’ as part of ‘cultural safety’ training
RELATED ARTICLE
Here on the website, from ultrasounds to shingles, Alzheimer’s, organ donation, comas, birth trauma, and more – we have covered the dark side of the medical industry.
Why you should NEVER trust the ‘experts’..
RELATED VIDEO
The fraudsters are constantly being exposed as their lies collapse under their own weight.
They lie, and people die – or become lifelong customers to those that mangled them.
Driven by profit and power, Big Pharma has shown no regard for personal safety or legal regulations, as consumers continue to trust companies caught intentionally lying to the public, promoting products underpinned by non-objective science and deception.
When Big Pharma ‘Gets It Wrong’ in Australia
RELATED FEATURE
Unquestioning faith is all-pervasive in the patient-doctor and patient-pharma relationship, to the detriment of patients all across Australia and the world.
It should come as no surprise that the devices these fraudsters use are also dangerous.
Before you are recommended one of these devices, sit and think for a second about the process involved in getting that product in front of your face.
You may wake up to yourself and snap out of the medical spell.

KEEP UP-TO-DATE
For more TOTT News:
Facebook — Facebook.com/TOTTNews
YouTube — YouTube.com/TOTTNews
Instagram — Instagram.com/TOTTNews
Twitter — Twitter.com/EthanTOTT
Rumble — Rumble.com/c/TOTTNews
Bitchute — Bitchute.com/TOTTNews
Gab — Gab.com/TOTTNews


You asked a rhetorical question, namely “Can the TGA be trusted?” Look at its performance during Convid1984 while led by Professor John “Anton LaVey” Skerritt. Inter alia, it waved through the “safe and effective” Covax, which has killed at least 200 million people worldwide, with many more injured. And astonishingly, they still claim it is “safe and effective”. I think your question has been answered.