First arrests have already been made.

---

‘HATE SPEECH’ CRACKDOWN

The Queensland Parliament has passed new laws criminalising certain forms of ‘hate speech’, marking one of the most significant changes to the state’s legal framework on public expression in recent years.

The legislation, which came into effect earlier this month, specifically targets ‘antisemitic slogans and symbols’, as well as expressions that “threaten or intimidate people on the basis of religion or ethnicity”.

Under the new laws, the use, display or publication of certain phrases and symbols can carry a maximum penalty of up to two years imprisonment.

The legislation has been framed as a ‘necessary step’ to ‘protect communities and religious groups from targeted harassment’, particularly at places of worship.

Two slogans – “From the River to the Sea” and “Globalise the Intifada” – are explicitly prohibited under the new legislation. Government officials argue these phrases are often used in contexts that are ‘antisemitic’ and can ‘incite hostility towards Jewish communities’.

On the first day of enforcement, two protesters were charged for using one of the banned slogans at a demonstration outside the Queensland Parliament.

Queensland Police Commissioner Brett Pointing has said that the law will require “careful judgement from officers” in determining what constitutes a breach.

“This is a challenging area for law enforcement,” a police spokesperson said.

“We must balance protecting the community from hate-driven expression with maintaining the right to peaceful protest and public debate.”

The legislation builds on earlier reforms in Queensland targeting ‘hate-motivated offences’.

Previous measures had already prohibited the public display of Nazi symbols and increased penalties for crimes motivated by prejudice against groups defined by race, religion, sexuality or gender identity.

The new laws extend these protections by criminalising specific verbal and written expressions, particularly in public or at demonstrations.

Supporters of the legislation have emphasised the need to respond to rising incidents of ‘antisemitism’ and ‘extremist activity’.

Queensland Premier David Crisafulli highlighted that the law is intended to ‘safeguard communities’ and ‘prevent targeted harassment at religious institutions’.

“We are sending a clear message that hate speech and intimidation will not be tolerated in our state,” the Premier said.

However, the laws have sparked controversy and raised concerns among civil liberties groups and legal experts. Critics argue that the legislation risks infringing on freedom of expression and may suppress legitimate political debate, particularly surrounding sensitive international issues such as the Israel-Palestine conflict.

Amnesty International Australia described the law as a “serious threat to fundamental freedoms,” warning that its broad definitions could lead to arbitrary enforcement.

Legal analysts have noted the enforcement of these laws will likely test the limits of free speech protections under Australian law. They caution that while the legislation targets specific ‘harmful expressions’, interpretation in real-world situations may prove complex, particularly when slogans or symbols are used in political or academic contexts.

The Queensland government has emphasised that the legislation is narrowly focused and does not intend to criminalise political discussion or criticism of government policies.

Nonetheless, the precise boundaries speech remains a subject of debate.

As Queensland navigates the early days of the law’s enforcement, attention is likely to focus on its practical application and the responses from the public and civil society.

With two arrests already recorded, the legislation has moved quickly from debate to action, signalling the government’s determination to curb what it sees as ‘dangerous hate speech’.

The new hate speech laws are part of a broader national conversation in Australia about the balance between free expression, community safety, and concern over ‘extremist rhetoric.’

Our country is heading down a very dangerous pathway.

AUSTRALIA’S THOUGHTCRIMALS

In George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four, those who have engaged in ‘Wrongthink’ are paraded on large projector screens right across the city, as these ‘Thoughtcriminals’ confess their ‘crimes’ of betraying the all-encompassing, all-knowing Party.

We are not very far off from this reality in 2026 Australia.

For many years, we have warned about and covered this emerging dystopian situation.

The rise of PC culture was the first attempt to frame state-approved understanding of what we think, write and say, by imposing ‘desirable’ mental attitudes on individuals and removing ‘undesirable’ thoughts from our mind – along with words from our vocabulary.

Thought Police: The End of Free Speech in Australia
RELATED FEATURE

This push has led to a society that suppresses open and dispassionate debate on a number of topics – the result being a fearfully polite public that is careful to avoid offence if it means being labelled as ‘intolerant, hateful, or closed-minded’.

Now, because nobody spoke up back then, you don’t have a choice but to be polite – as anything else that may offend or insult is considered criminal activity.

Bondi was the perfect justification needed to take this insanity to the next level.

Immediately after the event, a range of state and federal officials started calling for more powers to ‘contain the spread of hate’, including pushes for gun control reform, enhanced legislative restrictions, and further suppression and censorship of ‘extremist ideals’.

Bondi Event Already Being Used for Further Government Control
RELATED FEATURE

The Albanese government rushed through their ‘hate speech’ law reforms in January, supposedly aimed at ‘curbing extremism and intimidation’.

Under the legislation, individuals and groups found guilty of “intentionally promoting or inciting hatred against people based on protected characteristics” – including race, religion, ethnicity and other attributes – can face substantial penalties, including prison.

Australian government passes dystopian ‘hate speech’ laws
RELATED ARTICLE

The bill has garnered criticisms after allowing for the criminalisation of certain categories of speech – particularly where definitions are broad or ambiguous – threatening to chill legitimate public debate on contentious issues, and restrict fundamental liberties.

States would soon follow with the ‘hate speech’ campaign.

Last month, new conduct rules came into force in NSW that explicitly ban ‘hate speech’ by educators and school staff across all sectors – gaining criticisms from civil liberty groups.

NSW introduces sweeping ‘hate speech’ ban in schools
RELATED ARTICLE

Queensland would soon follow with this bill, which Premier Crisafulli would call “a strong and considered response” to rising concerns about ‘antisemitic language and actions’.

Queensland plans criminal penalties for use of ‘from the river to the sea’
RELATED ARTICLE

With each passing day, people are being arrested and harassed for expressing their own thoughts and beliefs that may not align with ‘protected’ government groups.

The ‘Hate Speech’ Persecution Begins..
RELATED VIDEO

It is truly the stuff out of science fiction novels coming to life in the West.

In the future, this type of chilling control will go a step even further towards ‘pre crime’ enforcement, in true Minority Report fashion.

Any criminals engaging in ‘wrongthink’ will be dealt with accordingly.

---

---

KEEP UP-TO-DATE

For more TOTT News:

Facebook — Facebook.com/TOTTNews

YouTube — YouTube.com/TOTTNews

Instagram — Instagram.com/TOTTNews

Twitter — Twitter.com/EthanTOTT

Rumble — Rumble.com/c/TOTTNews

Bitchute — Bitchute.com/channel/TOTTNews

Gab — Gab.com/TOTTNews

---

---