
Photo: SMI
It’s almost as if it’s allowed to happen.
THE INFAMOUS WATCH LIST
With every ‘terrorist’ event that occurs, you can be confident that either the suspect involved was on some sort of a watchlist by federal authorities, or they are either being funded by or are a part of the agencies themselves.
In the aftermath of the Bondi shooting event, it didn’t take too long for the all-too-familiar pattern to be discovered yet again.
There are reports from news organisations and intelligence insiders that Australian security agencies had previously taken an interest in Naveed Akram — younger suspect — but he was ‘not actively being monitored as an imminent threat’ at the time.
Australia’s domestic intelligence service, ASIO, had previously examined him in connection with individuals linked to an Islamic State-aligned cell in Sydney. That examination occurred around 2019 and followed a terrorism investigation at the time.

Authorities say early indicators suggest the two men involved were inspired by Islamic State (ISIS) propaganda, based on items found at the scene and other evidence.

The suspect is also reported as having travelled overseas to Manilla in the months leading up to the event to undergo military-style weapons training in a known hotspot for radical ideologies.

So, what is the point of a watch list if you are not actually watching them?
How did they manage to have so many supposed ISIS links, even leaving the country to travel to a suspicious region just recently — yet still end up falling off the radar?
Either there are serious problems with our intelligence agencies and their actual intelligence gathering capabilities, or this kind of thing is being allowed to happen behind the scenes. And I think the first scenario is very unlikely.
But it gets worse.
Some analysts and commentators are questioning whether past assessments could have been followed up differently, or if the system should have flagged him later — especially once his father legally acquired firearms.

The fact that weapons used in the attack were legally owned by the father – despite the son’s prior intelligence interest – is a major red flag. How was this ignored? Anyone that has dealt with strict gun policies in this country knows this is a crock.
As adam.fityaa explains it in his recent video on Instagram:
Australian Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke defended the intelligence agencies’ decisions, saying after review he has “full confidence” in the way ASIO and police assessed risks and that there was no clear failure in intelligence handling.
Somehow another one just ‘slipped through the cracks’, hey?
This seems to happen more often than not, to the point one can no longer believe that our well-funded, highly-sophisticated intelligence networks are this naïve and incompetent.
We are living in a clown world of false flag shenanigans around every corner.
SYDNEY SIEGE FLASHBACK
Every single ‘terrorist attack’ that we see in the public sphere should be questioned immediately, as Western governments have a knack with somehow always being tied to the supposed suspects.
Ten years ago, we saw the exact same thing with Man Haron Monis and the Sydney Siege False Flag — an event we covered in real-time back in 2015. As always, the official story was riddled with intelligence holes, just like the Bondi shooting.
Ten Years Later: The Sydney Siege False Flag
RELATED ARTICLE
For instance, we know that Man Haron Monis was on ASIO’s watch list around 2008–2009 for a series of abusive letters he sent to families of Australian soldiers who had died overseas.
Yeah, he was a real class act.
Officials, including then-Prime Minister Tony Abbott, later confirmed that although he had been on a watch list, he was ‘no longer on any active security or terror watch list’ by the time he carried out the Lindt Café siege in December 2014.
Sound familiar?
Monis was well known to multiple Australian agencies — including ASIO, the Australian Federal Police, and NSW Police — due to his long criminal history, erratic extremist-type conduct, and legal troubles.

The reasons for his removal from the list have never been publicly detailed, but the fact he was no longer on it raised questions in the aftermath — and should raise questions now as history repeats itself.

The problem still hasn’t been solved.
Why?
Because, perhaps, they don’t want it to be.
The good old ‘lone wolf terrorist’ era is what they want.
Ambiguous, in the shadows — a bogeyman around every corner.
One they can shift to whoever is a ‘spreader of hate’ like these gentlemen.
Members, for those who want to go a little ‘deeper down the rabbit hole’ on Sydney, I recently spoke of the significance of Martin Place in Sydney (where the ‘siege’ occurred) and the movie, The Matrix:
The Sydney Metacortex
RELATED VIDEO
There is always a much deeper symbolic significant behind these false flag events.
But back to the Bondi shooting and our intelligence agencies: As I said earlier, either they are repeated bumbling idiots, or they allow these things to happen to further push their agendas. You decide which one is the truth.
They will tip-toe around this event like they always do — not linking it to Islam in fear of Islamophobia, but projecting the message towards ‘anti-semitism’ and ‘white Australians’.
We already know they see sovereign citizens and so-called ‘Nazis’ as the new ‘threat’ facing Australia.
Both the left and the right side of the ideological trap are both very critical of Israel in the present day, and with more online censorship and ‘anti-hate’ laws coming with each passing day, watch them ‘flip the script’ on this event in that direction.
Do you think our intelligence agencies just ‘made a mistake’ again?
Or do you agree with my thoughts on the calculated mechanisms of false flag terror events?
Be sure to let me know your thoughts in the comment section below!

KEEP UP-TO-DATE
For more TOTT News:
Facebook — Facebook.com/TOTTNews
YouTube — YouTube.com/TOTTNews
Instagram — Instagram.com/TOTTNews
Twitter — Twitter.com/EthanTOTT
Bitchute — Bitchute.com/TOTTNews
Gab — Gab.com/TOTTNews



You might notice that any event that happens out of the blue and that includes 9/11, that only ordinary people are killed or maimed. There are never any high officials, CEOs, Presidents, Premiers, corporation heads or elites taken out, just innocent bystanders, to them not important people. It always seems to be the ‘lone wolf’ or a few terrorists that manage to pull it off. This includes the Israeli attack on October 7th. How could anyone get past all that military surveillance in Israel?? without being notice straight away??? It seems there are a lot of inside jobs or events that are ‘allowed’ to happen.
David Cohen as the “son” gunman?
“By deception we wage war”.