Photo: NNA
Questions still remain to this day.
THE SYDNEY SIEGE
The Sydney Siege ‘hostage crisis’ occurred on 15 December 2014 when a ‘lone gunman’, Man Haron Monis, reportedly held hostage ten customers and eight employees of a Lindt chocolate café at Martin Place. The event made national news at the time.
This week, in the wake of the 10 year anniversary, the mainstream media sat down with ‘survivors’ to hear how the ‘tragedy’ impacted their lives in a reflection feature piece.
The man pictured above is reported to be the police officer who was part of the team that stormed the cafe early in the hours of the next morning, and the one who shot Monis. It ‘haunts him‘, he says.
I plan to speak on this anniversary in a separate member piece, but after watching this presentation tonight, I wanted to remind everyone of just why the Sydney Siege was a ‘made-for-TV event’.
If this gentlemen truly did shoot Monis and is ‘haunted’ from this event, then he has one person to blame: The sniper who watched the ‘terrorist’ for hours on end with a clear sight and never took the shot.
Snipers in clear sight for the duration of the event.
Screenshot: Channel 7 News
Why didn’t he take the shot?
Because it was all manufactured television drama.
They say he didn’t take the shot because it was ‘impossible’ to penetrate the glass and hit Monis.
John le Bon – after extensive research on the chain of events in Martin Place – broke down contradictions by using scientific analysis to refute the notion that snipers were unable to shoot Monis:
The entire event is yet another example of a classic false flag, where the establishment benefitted.
At the time, myself, JLB and Lindsay the Silverfox began to question and breakdown the official narrative live on the Australian Roundtable Podcast, being the only media organisation to do so at the time.
After extensive research n the chain of events in Martin Place, below you will find archived over seven hours of ARP’s coverage of the event, including original podcast content, as well as media contradictions and an official rebuttal to the police narrative.
THE LIES EXPOSED
ARP Episode #11 –
‘Sydney Under Siege?’
On our first episode after the event, the beginning of ARP’s coverage, the panel highlighted the legislative and historical context of events in Australia leading up to the incident.
We also spoke on media coverage on the day of the ‘siege’, other events which were drowned out of the news, Tessa Kum of the ‘#illridewithyou’ hashtag, inconsistencies of the official story, and much more:
ARP Episode #12 –
‘Sydney Siege False Flag – Part I’
The next episode, one week after the event had occurred, provides a much more comprehensive breakdown of the narrative.
This included Channel 7’s cover story about the ‘sniper’, initial ‘eye witness’ accounts of the event, anti-gun rights propaganda in the media, Ken Johnson (the grinning father, pictured below), and more:
There were many questions in the aftermath of this event; many inconsistencies, theories and confusion as to what took place this morning in Sydney. Such as:
Why were videos of prior hostage drills in Sydney removed from social media and news sites?
(You will notice many the links above are in the Wayback Machine archive after being deleted).
Why was Monis released on bail as a man ‘posing no threat’ after facing accessory to his ex-wife’s murder and more than 40 sex offences against several women??? Furthermore, is it a coincidence that he was released under bail laws the government was pushing to tighten following the event?
How did one of the most comprehensive intelligence networks on the planet allow a man – who was known to media, courts, intelligence & police before the event – to carry out this siege so easily?
Surely the incompetence is not this prevalent? Australia had also just raised the ‘terrorism alert level’ to high. Why was he not on a suspected ASIO terror list?
And this was only just the beginning..
Media Coverage:
Why don’t the stories match?
‘Sunlies’, produced by John le Bon, offers a first glimpse of the media inconsistencies the team alluded upon on Episode #12 of the ARP.
Here, we see a clear disparity in narratives of the event from the same channel in a 24 hour period:
Why did the story change so much in just a short period of time?
Did they think nobody was watching?
And why was everyone so happy in the aftermath?
Ken Johnson, ‘The Grinning Father’.
Photo: JohnleBon.com
ARP Episode #13 –
‘Sydney Siege False Flag – Part II’
In the final episode of ARP’s coverage, the panel was joined by Tim O’Hare, as they recap information from previous episodes, and take a look at the ongoing media media fear campaign in the aftermath:
Directly following the event, harsh ‘anti-terror’ legislation was rammed through – via ABC News.
‘Parliamentary committee considers third wave of new security laws as Sydney mourns siege deaths’
“The Chairman of Federal Parliament’s Joint Intelligence and Security Committee, Dan Tehan, has questioned whether the Government needs further powers in the wake of the Sydney siege.
The committee was currently investigating the Government’s third wave of new national security laws into retaining phone and computer data.
Mr Tehan said he expected the Government to separately consider whether its new suite of measures would be enough to prevent lone wolf attacks.”
It was yet another event to further tighten Australia’s surveillance state apparatus.
The good old ‘lone wolf terrorist’ era. The bogeyman around every corner.
After watching and listening to all of this information, do you still believe the official narrative?
Members, for those who want to go a little ‘deeper down the rabbit hole’, I recently spoke of the significance of Martin Place in Sydney and The Matrix:
What are your thoughts on the Sydney Siege?
Do you remember this day?
This anniversary certainly takes me back to a life-changing time, kicking back with JLB and The Silverfox in Toowong discussing this as it happened.
What a journey it has been, and we’ll always be here to remind the public about the inconsistencies and questions associated with this event.
KEEP UP-TO-DATE
For more TOTT News:
Facebook — Facebook.com/TOTTNews
YouTube — YouTube.com/TOTTNews
Instagram — Instagram.com/TOTTNews
Twitter — Twitter.com/EthanTOTT
Bitchute — Bitchute.com/TOTTNews
Gab — Gab.com/TOTTNews
Well done, Ethan, a comprehensive examination of this manufactured event. Indeed a false flag…nowhere near as bad as Port Arthur, of course, but bad nonetheless. Anyone still believe we have some sort of “benevolent government” in this poor benighted country? It harbours evil at its very core. Port Arthur was perpetrated by at least one skilled, military-trained marksman and blamed on an MKUltra-ed, mentally-deficient patsy. Pure, unadulterated government-sponsored evil.