The once-hidden practice now out in the open.

---

GEOENGINEERING HEARING HELD

There has been a recent push in the United States to halt, or slow down, weather modifications programs – as geoengineering continues to go from ‘conspiracy’ to mainstream science.

This week, the U.S Subcommittee on Delivering on Government Efficiency held a hearing titled: “Playing God with the Weather — a Disastrous Forecast.”

During the hearing, members analysed the federal government’s role in weather control and geoengineering activities, and any potential underlying consequences of such involvement.

Members also examined the ethical and legal issues surrounding the use of weather and climate control technology, in perhaps the most public expose of the practices to-date.

In her opening statement, Subcommittee Chairwoman Marjorie Taylor Greene noted that the history of the federal government’s involvement in geoengineering is poorly understood – and that the American people have not been provided with transparency on how their taxpayer dollars are being spent on these activities.

“I don’t think it’s the job of the federal government to help these people play God with the weather”, Greene noted in her opening remarks.

“In fact, I think it’s the job of Congress to protect our people and make sure that weather and climate control experiments and activities do not create adverse unintended consequences for the rest of us.“

Greene also called for an outright ban on geoengineering, and used the hearing to promote her federal Clear Skies Act, which would impose fines of up to $100,000 and potentially jail time for anyone conducting “weather modification” activities.

Republicans across the U.S are pushing bills to stop weather modification
RELATED ARTICLE

During the event, there were guest speakers who joined alongside congressmen/women, including:

Dr. Roger Pielke Jr. (Senior Fellow at American Enterprise Institute), Christopher Martz (Meteorologist/Policy Analyst for Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow), Michael MacCracken (Chief Scientist for Climate Change Programs, Climate Institute), and Michael MacCracken (former Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory scientist).

Christopher Martz testified regarding the uncertainty of current ‘climate models’:

“While the planet has gotten warmer over the last 100 years, there is uncertainty as to exactly how much influence humans have exerted on it,” Martz stated.

“This uncertainty arises from the fact that climate models produce too much warming with known physics, which is why modelers have to artificially calibrate their models to the instrumental temperature record.”

‘Climate change’ was certainly a big focus of the event, as much of the modern pushes for mainstream geoengineering come from this underlying doomsday science.

‘We must alter the weather to save ourselves from global warming!’

Representative Pat Fallon argued that former Vice President Al Gore’s misrepresentation regarding the melting of the north polar ice cap invalidates decades of climate science.

Michael MacCracken tried to ‘combat the climate denialism’ in the room, challenging ideas that current efforts are sufficiently powerful or scalable enough to change a major weather phenomenon, or that they are targeted to harm the public.

‘We can’t successfully manipulate the weather, and no harm is intentionally being done’.

A talking point these mad scientists hold on to as their hidden practice of weather modification becomes exposed to the public after many decades.

These are the same people that told you for years the programs were never real – all just ‘conspiracy’ – now are saying, ‘well, they are real, but they aren’t really doing anything’.

Are we to honestly believe this?

Especially when governments and major research institutions are all pushing for their own forms of radical experiments across the world?

When the consequences are also being warned by the same scientific establishment?

WEATHER MODIFICATION PUSH

Ten years ago, you were a ‘conspiracy theorist’ if you thought weather modification even existed.

Today, you are called a ‘conspiracy theorist’ because you believe it is wrong and may cause harm.

Indeed, there has been a rapid shift from secrecy to mainstream science in recent years, with many only just discovering geoengineering for the first time as a result.

The more people are learning, the most they are becoming upset.

On the legislative side of things, earlier this month, a bill to ban geoengineering projects passed the Florida Senate. This was a statement towards the mad scientists who think they have no accountability, until now.

Florida approves bill to BAN weather modification across the state
RELATED ARTICLE

Similarly, in Tennessee, the House of Representatives passed a bill designed to prevent geoengineering and any other forms of intentional modification of the atmosphere.

Montana’s Senate Bill 473 also bans geoengineering practices like stratospheric aerosol injection and solar radiation management, but permits cloud seeding for water resource management. It was passed in March.

But federal programs are still pushing ahead, hence the need for a federal hearing like this one.

For instance, the U.S has been pushing ahead with these types of studies for a few years now on a federal level.

In 2022, The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) announced a five-year research plan to study solar geoengineering – as a means to ‘combat climate change’.

White House begins geoengineering study using converted B-57
RELATED ARTICLE

British scientists are also set to experiment with geoengineering techniques to ‘block sunlight’ as part of a £50 million government-funded scheme. We took a look inside this programme in a recent feature piece:

Inside the U.K’s £57 million geoengineering programme
RELATED ARTICLE

However, things are not going as smoothly as the mad scientists would have hoped.

Just in February, a U.S research non-profit called Arctic Ice Project (AIP) announced they will end their ongoing geoengineering experiments in the Arctic, citing environmental concerns and “potential risks to the food chain”.

Arctic geoengineering experiment shuts down over environmental risks
RELATED ARTICLE

They faced massive backlash from indigenous groups and local environmentalists, who say the environmental risks are endless — including impacts to food production and disease re-emergence, among other concerns.

Solar geoengineering may impact food production, cause conflict
RELATED ARTICLE

Study warns solar geoengineering could return risk of malaria for one billion people
RELATED ARTICLE

---

To learn more about the history and scope of geoengineering, see our podcast series here:

Discussion: Weather Modification History with Jim Lee | Part I

Discussion: Weather Modification History with Jim Lee | Part II

---

It’s great to see such a public hearing on a topic that was considered ‘crazy’ just a decade ago, vindicating the calls of activists for many years who have called for a halt to the radical technology.

Now, as newer (and more extreme) forms of weather modification begin to creep in, such as solar radiation management, it has never been more of a crucial time to stop these people dead in their tracks.

For if somebody doesn’t, the very fabric of our planet may begin to shift, to the detriment of us all.

Did you have a chance to check out the hearing? What are your thoughts?

Be sure to leave a comment down below!

---

---

KEEP UP-TO-DATE

For more TOTT News:

Facebook — Facebook.com/TOTTNews

YouTube — YouTube.com/TOTTNews

Instagram — Instagram.com/TOTTNews

Twitter — Twitter.com/EthanTOTT

Bitchute — Bitchute.com/TOTTNews

Gab — Gab.com/TOTTNews

---

---