
Photo: NER
The manufacturer will scale back new technology.
DRIVER MONITORING BACKLASH
Dystopian technology that watches motorists as they drive along will be “toned down” by a popular car manufacturer after backlash from critics and customers.
Mitsubishi has revealed it will tweak its overly sensitive ‘driver monitoring system’ (DMS) in its new Triton ute, after copping a barrage of criticism about the controversial feature.

The technology is designed to ‘keep drivers focused on the road ahead’, ‘watching for safety’, but in reality, it behaves like an overbearing back-seat driver.
The feature, as present, is so sensitive that an alarm sounds if a driver so much as takes a quick sip of coffee, or glances at the steering wheel buttons for a few seconds.
In other words, a digital Nanny State authority figure is in your car at all times, nit-picking every ‘unsafe’ move that is made by the driver.
Sipping a coffee, laughing and checking your blind spot – something quite essential to safe driving – all set off the system. And people have had enough.
There are mixed reviews about the technology. Some motorists support the idea and others have lashed out, stating it’s more of a “distraction” than a safety feature.
“Keep eyes on road’ says the flashing message that isn’t on the road. F —ing stupid idea,” said one reader John.
Mitsubishi CEO Shaun Westcott said the calibration of DMS required a “fine balance” whilst adhering to strict ANCAP safety protocols.
“We’re confident the updated software further enhances the drive, while remaining five-star ANCAP safe,” he said.
The update aims ‘to reduce the system’s sensitivity to natural movements and raise the activation speed threshold’. It will be installed during customers’ next scheduled service.
And this issue isn’t unique to Mitsubishi.
Many new cars now come equipped with driver monitoring systems that, while designed to enhance safety, more times than often become more of an annoyance.
Despite the abundance of negative reviews, the technology will be mandatory in every vehicle sold in Europe from 2026.
Whilst it’s not mandatory in Australia, many car brands will be adopting it to achieve a five-star car safety rating, meaning that the trickle-down effect will reach our shores eventually.
MANDATORY CAR SURVEILLANCE
If you are not a fan of this technology, the message is simple: You better get used to it.
All major manufacturers, including General Motors, are collecting driving data from their vehicles – such as how heavily you brake and the speeds at which you drive – and selling that to insurers.
Cars with internet-connected features are fast becoming “privacy nightmare on wheels”, according to US-based research conducted by the Mozilla Foundation.
One prominent example is when Tesla employees, just last year, had access to vision captured by cameras attached to their cars and shared compromising videos with each other via private messages – including one of a man approaching his car completely naked.

Now, The EU has ruled that all new cars sold beyond July 2024 must be equipped with ‘Event Data Recorders’, following an update of the UN’s World Harmonisation of Vehicle Regulations (WHVR).
You’re under constant surveillance wherever you go now. An hour in the car is the only time some of us have – without phones or cameras or nagging people – to be alone with our thoughts.
Now, they’re trying to take that away from us, too.
A mass surveillance state both inside and outside of your car, for your ‘safety’ of course.
Right before the autonomous vehicle ‘driverless revolution’ takes over.
But at least some people are starting to get fed up with all of this. But is it already too late?
Have you encountered this type of new-age surveillance technology?
Let us know your thoughts on all of this in the comment section below!

KEEP UP-TO-DATE
For more TOTT News:
Facebook — Facebook.com/TOTTNews
YouTube — YouTube.com/TOTTNews
Instagram — Instagram.com/TOTTNews
Twitter — Twitter.com/EthanTOTT
Bitchute — Bitchute.com/TOTTNews
Gab — Gab.com/TOTTNews


Is this all about driving us insane? Where is the proof it makes driving safer, sounds more of a distraction. Are the majority of people that bad at driving? Maybe make driving tests a bit harder instead? I certainly won’t be buying a new car, not that I can afford to. I will hope that there will be some car manufacturers who will leave it out for those who don’t want it or some tech savvy people who can find a way to disable it. So sick of hearing more and more about technology making our lives “safer” and more “efficient”, just buzz words to cover up the real reasons. Data is a mine field.
I agree with Lin, the “active safety” features already installed in cars in the last 20 years or so ago can be very annoying particularly when the sensors begin to fail and give you warnings like seatbelt warning when the seatbelt is in fact securely fastened, just the microswitch isn’t registering properly, these devices are not designed to last the life of the vehicle so are just an added cost to the motorist to have them maintained. Some things like ABS can be useful when traveling on bitumen but unless the settings are changed can cause issues if you hit a patch of gravel or ice and have to stop quickly, they are all devices that can be an extra cause of failure so I’ll continue to drive older vehicles until they are outlawed which if the UN has its way won’t be long now!