Photo: MKC
Slow-killing the ‘useless eaters’.
INCOME-SUPPORT TRAP
Australians receiving income-support payments experience a mortality rate around nine times higher than people outside the welfare system, according to new analysis by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW).
The analysis examined Australians aged 22 to 64, and linked income-support records with death registrations over the 2012-2022 period.
It found an average mortality rate of about 610 deaths per 100,000 persons among people receiving payments, compared with 67 deaths per 100,000 among those who were not.
The figures highlight a substantial difference in health outcomes between Australians receiving income support and those outside the system.
Those on income support include people experiencing unemployment, disability, and significant socio-economic disadvantage.
People receiving unemployment payments specifically had an average mortality rate of about 270 deaths per 100,000 persons – roughly four times the rate of those employed.
The rate was considerably higher among recipients of the Disability Support Pension, at about 1,600 deaths per 100,000 persons.
The analysis also identified particularly large differences in some causes of death.
Among those 22 to 64 years old, mortality associated with accidental poisoning was around 22 times higher among income-support recipients, while deaths from alcoholic liver disease were around 21 times higher. Suicide mortality was approximately five times higher.
The findings provide evidence of a pronounced mortality inequality, and raise important questions about the circumstances faced by Australians relying on income support.
Particularly those experiencing disability, unemployment, substance-related harm, financial hardship, or other forms of disadvantage.
The data offers a clearer picture of the health disparities associated with participation in Australia’s income-support system – something every citizen is being pushed towards.
The parasites in control of our government want nothing more than a sicker, poorer, and more dependent populous. Especially now, considering that AI is threatening to push us all towards a modern form of Western economic communism.
The gap between the top 1% of society and the rest of us is only getting bigger, while the middle class is systematically destroyed before our very eyes.
EUGENICS 101
Government dependence is a slow-form of self-harm, and something that is desired not only for control of the human herd – but for ‘humane’ eugenics population levelling.
This is especially true when you consider they are pushing us as a society towards a system where everyone receives collective income-support – the marxist utopian dream.
A Universal Basic Income, or UBI, is a regular, obligation-free baseline payment that is given to everyone in a society. There are different models, but those key elements endure in research studies and pilot projects around the world.
Now, a growing body of research suggests UBI could be the ‘answer’ to AI shattering long-held high rates of employment – a statistic expected to increase over the next few decades.
More people will lose their jobs and become poorer as time goes on, ending up having to receive benefits, until everyone find themselves at the mercy of the government.
UBI and Technofeudalism
RELATED PODCAST
Even money itself will change, as we are allowed our pre-approved digital tokens to spend.
In the future, it seems all our mortality rates will increase as we all end up on UBI.
Which is exactly what they want for all of us “useless eaters”.
Remember that just last month, a new study proposed that the world should gradually reduce its population to around four billion people to ‘ease pressure on resources’.
Anti-human philosophy is at the heart of destroying prosperity in a society, and the people running the economy and welfare systems subscribe to these theories.
This calculated eugenics vision has been going on for generations now.
“A modest cull would strike at the root of our fiscal dilemma,” suggested Toby Ralph in his 2013 piece “Kill the Poor” on the website of Liberal Party-aligned think-tank, Menzies House.
Ralph, a long-time Liberal Party strategist, went on to say that “…in contrast to the fabulously rich, the enormously poor make little useful contribution to society”.
They don’t care about us poor people, and would rather pay us shekels while we die slow. Even if you are not on welfare, chances are you likely depend on government in some form – which is the case for the majority of voters in Australia.
Majority of voters now depend on government income, research finds
RELATED ARTICLE
Population management and resets are nothing new, and have also occurred many times throughout history – primarily driven by imperialism and government power.
Imperialism and Population Resets | FFT
RELATED PODCAST
Not only does this research highlight a stark contrast between being employed and living on government support, but it also explains just why they aren’t too quick to improve things.
They don’t want things to get better – they want the less fortunate to slowly disappear off population charts, while the upper-classes prep their new robotic slave class replacements.
The human herd just needs to sit by, struggle, and die, until this point can be reached.
Bonus acceleration points will be given to those who speak out against the government and find their digital shekels blacklisted for use – and social credit score subsequently dropped.
KEEP UP-TO-DATE
For more TOTT News:
Facebook — Facebook.com/TOTTNews
YouTube — YouTube.com/TOTTNews
Instagram — Instagram.com/TOTTNews
Twitter — Twitter.com/EthanTOTT
Rumble — Rumble.com/c/TOTTNews
Bitchute — Bitchute.com/TOTTNews
Gab — Gab.com/TOTTNews
I suppose that we’ll have to help eachother out with childcare, to be able to circumvent childcare subsidies.There’s also other ways to reduce government assistance. Pity that we have to pay rates, even though it’s not legally required & they’ll sell your property from under your feet otherwise… Our dream was to live money-free. It’s hard to not live on government assistance while setting up a business to be successful; especially when you put your heart & soul into it. We’ll get there, eventually; I think so.
Good on you, Clarissa.
Or if you adopt a lower world population starting point, i.e./e.g. 3 billion, as estimated by Max Igan et al, and reduce it by half to 1.5 billion, you are starting to get close to their desired 500 million as inscribed on The Georgia Guidestones…before they destroyed them, due to too much publicity.
There are many common features amongst those on benefits: they are already unwell in some aspect to be on benefits and usually of a lower SEC and less education about healthy lifestyle. To be able to qualify (at least through the Covid period) they had to be appropriately vaccinated: and to maintain medicare benefits they will be seeing GPs who continue to promote high vaccination levels. There is plenty of reason here why they should have lower health than those outside the system.