
Photo: SKO
More surveillance for your ‘safety’.
BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING
The European Parliament has approved an extension of rules that allow technology companies to scan certain private communications for ‘child sexual abuse material’, renewing a debate over the balance between online safety and digital privacy.

The measure, often referred to by critics as “Chat Control 1.0”, extends a temporary legal framework that permits online platforms, including messaging and social media services, to use automated tools to detect and report suspected ‘child sexual abuse material’.

The rules were introduced as an exception to existing European privacy regulations, allowing companies to continue voluntary detection efforts while a legal framework is negotiated.

Supporters of the measure argue that scanning technology is an important tool in combating the spread of child exploitation material online. They say online platforms need effective ways to identify illegal content and assist law enforcement agencies investigating networks.
However, the decision has triggered criticism from privacy campaigners, cybersecurity experts, and digital rights organisations.
They argue that allowing companies to scan private communications risks weakening the confidentiality of online conversations and could create systems that may be expanded for broader surveillance purposes in the future.
The controversy is particularly focused on the implications for encrypted communications.
End-to-end encryption is designed so that only the sender and recipient can access the contents of messages, preventing platforms and outside parties from reading them.
Critics warn that any requirement to scan encrypted messages could undermine this protection and create security risks for millions of users.
The parliamentary vote has also highlighted divisions within the EU over how to regulate online spaces. At present, platforms remain responsible for implementing detection measures within the legal boundaries set by the European Union.

The extension is expected to remain in place while EU institutions continue discussions over a permanent set of rules.
That future legislation has become one of the most contested digital policy debates in Europe, with supporters seeking stronger obligations on technology companies and opponents warning against mandatory scanning systems.
The dispute reflects a wider debate about the role of technology companies in policing online content – something we have witnessed here in Australia as well.
Governments are increasingly seeking greater ‘cooperation’ from platforms to ‘tackle illegal activity’, while civil liberties groups warn that expanded monitoring powers could change the nature of private communication on the internet. Protections that are already on the brink.
The critics are correct: the entire end goal here is a system of mass control.
Europe, much like us here in Australia, has been on a systematic path of destruction for a while now – with digital systems creeping further into the lives of citizens.
We are all travelling down the dystopian path of virtual domination together.
THE FALL OF THE EUROPE
The once great continent of Europe is looking like a shell of its former self in 2026, as increasing volatility across the continent is used as justification for expanded online regimes.
Earlier this year, it was announced that travellers entering Europe will now face a new ‘digital border regime’, with biometric checks beginning to replace traditional passport stamps.
Europe introduces biometric border system, ending passport stamps for non-EU travellers
RELATED ARTICLE
Justified primarily in the name of providing ‘security’, these measures form the backbone of a vast biometric identity system that will offer both EU and national government agencies myriad new options for tracking and monitoring the movements and behaviours.

This type of shift shouldn’t come as a surprise – along with many of the other problems Europe is facing – considering a secretive elite created the EU to build a world government.
How a Secretive Elite Created the EU to Build a World Government
RELATED FEATURE
In the U.K – who are no longer part of the EU but are still basically in the exact same boat – they have also witnessed an increase in erosions of civil liberties over the past few decades.
Mass monitoring is already being used to scan messages and online comments for so-called ‘hate speech’. In 2023, U.K police recorded around 12,183 arrests under laws that cover ‘harmful content’ online and via electronic communications.
U.K Police Arrest 12,000 People in One Year for Online Comments – We Will Be Next
RELATED ARTICLE
The government is looking at Digital ID as a way to tackle illegal immigration, in true ‘problem, reaction, solution’ fashion.
The Prime Minister said a new identity programme could play an “important part” in ‘reducing the incentive to enter the U.K without permission’.

Some of the U.K’s largest banks have also joined an industry-led initiative to develop a “reusable digital identity network” to transform how customers verify their financial identity.
Major U.K banks unite behind ‘reusable digital identity network’
RELATED ARTICLE
What will underpin these identity systems?
Mass monitoring, social credit scores, and ‘pre-crime’ analysis of your patterns.
Don’t say anything ‘bad’ online, because Big Brother will be watching.
All under the guise of ‘safety’ and ‘security’ of children, as always.
Australia is no better off, with TOTT News extensively covering the end of encryption, social media obligations under law, spy agency powers, and more.
eSafety Commissioner will force big tech to scan photos, emails
RELATED ARTICLE
A worldwide agenda of digital control.

KEEP UP-TO-DATE
For more TOTT News:
Facebook — Facebook.com/TOTTNews
YouTube — YouTube.com/TOTTNews
Instagram — Instagram.com/TOTTNews
Twitter — Twitter.com/EthanTOTT
Rumble — Rumble.com/c/TOTTNews
Bitchute — Bitchute.com/TOTTNews
Gab — Gab.com/TOTTNews


More bricks added to the wall of the digital prison, with its all-seeing panopticon. And they can’t even tolerate “wrongthink”. Orwell would not be surprised at this dystopian, “post-truth” world.