Speakers call for greater transparency and accountability.

THE VACCINATION CONVERSATION

A public forum held in Canberra has once again brough attention to important questions surrounding vaccines, regulation, and the government’s role in health decisions.

The event, titled The Vaccination Conversation, was held on 28 May at Awaken Church in Kambah and was organised by advocacy group, Hear Our Voice.

Promoted as an opportunity for open discussion and public scrutiny, the forum featured speakers Dr. Judy Wilyman, Phillip Altman, and Wendy Daniel.

Organisers described the gathering as a platform to examine vaccine development, regulation, approval processes, and medical ethics, while also encouraging debate about the role of government agencies and public health authorities in shaping vaccination policy.

The event took place against a backdrop of ongoing public debate about the measures introduced during the COVID-19 ‘pandemic’, including vaccine mandates, lockdowns, and the balance between public health objectives and individual freedoms.

A central theme of the forum was informed consent and the extent to which Australians were able to make medical decisions free from coercion during the ‘pandemic’.

Speakers also raised concerns about the operation of the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), Australia’s medicines regulator, and the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI), which provides advice to governments on vaccination policy.

The organisers argued that greater transparency and public scrutiny of regulatory processes are necessary to maintain public confidence.

They also contended that dissenting views on vaccination policy were often marginalised and suppressed during the ‘pandemic’ years, limiting broader public discussion.

Dr. Judy Wilyman, one of Australia’s most prominent critics of mandates, focused on the historical development of vaccination policy and the expansion of government programmes.

Wilyman has long argued that vaccine safety, effectiveness, and policy decisions should be subject to greater public examination – positions that have generated considerable controversy within the medical and scientific communities.

Phillip Altman, having experience in pharmaceutical regulation and clinical trials, discussed concerns about regulatory oversight and decision-making during the ‘pandemic’.

For supporters, events such as The Vaccination Conversation provide an opportunity to question official narratives and advocate for greater transparency.

Well done to everyone involved.

KEEP UP-TO-DATE

For more TOTT News:

Facebook — Facebook.com/TOTTNews

YouTube — YouTube.com/TOTTNews

Instagram — Instagram.com/TOTTNews

Twitter — Twitter.com/EthanTOTT

Rumble — Rumble.com/c/TOTTNews

Bitchute — Bitchute.com/channel/TOTTNews

Gab — Gab.com/TOTTNews