Photo: SKP
More fluoride for New Zealand’s largest city.
FLUORIDE RETURNS TO AUCKLAND
Fluoride has begun returning to Auckland’s drinking water supply following a temporary pause, in a move confirmed by the city’s water utility, Watercare.
The reintroduction process started yesterday and is being phased across Auckland’s treatment plants over a period of approximately two weeks. Officials say the gradual rollout is designed to ‘ensure consistency’ and ‘allow systems to stabilise’ as fluoridation resumes.
Fluoridation had been suspended earlier due to a change in the supply of the fluoride treatment chemical. Watercare indicated the pause was operational in nature, linked to sourcing and transitioning to a new product, rather than concerns about quality or safety.
Public health officials have welcomed the return of fluoridation, emphasising its role in ‘preventing tooth decay’ and ‘reducing pressure on dental services’.
The pause in Auckland drew some public attention, reflecting the broader and often polarised debate surrounding fluoridation.
Supporters point to ‘decades of research’ supporting its ‘safety and effectiveness’, while critics raise concerns ranging from individual choice to potential long-term health effects.
However, mainstream scientific and medical bodies continue to support fluoridation.
In New Zealand, decisions around fluoridation have increasingly been centralised.
In recent years, the Director-General of Health has been granted Orwellian authority to direct local councils to fluoridate their water supplies.
Auckland, as the country’s largest city, has been a key part of that strategy.
Watercare says it maintains fluoridation systems at the request of the Director-General of Health under the Health (Fluoridation of Drinking Water) Amendment Act 2021, and continues to monitor water quality across the network as the process resumes.
Fluoride is added in drinking water it is typically added at between 0.7 and 1.0 parts per million, which the Ministry of Health describes as the ‘optimal range’.
With the phased reintroduction now under way, Auckland’s water supply is expected to return fully to fluoridated levels in the coming days.
Slowly, but surely, the ‘powers that be’ have ensured New Zealand follows the same path as most of the industrialised Western world over decades.
They want us all ingesting and bathing in phosphate industry by-products, whether we like it or not – from NZ to Australia, and far outside of the Pacific.
All under the guise of ‘safety’ and ‘security’, or course.
THE TIPTOE TO TYRANNY
It has been a calculated descent to this point in the country’s fluoridation journey.
New Zealand’s approach to water fluoridation has evolved from early local experiments into a centrally directed public health policy, amid decades of public debate over the science.
Fluoridation was first introduced in 1954 in Hastings, following earlier trials beginning around 1953. The initiative aimed to reduce tooth decay and was part of a broader international movement that gathered pace after the Second World War.
A national Commission of Inquiry in 1957 endorsed the practice, leading to rapid expansion across urban centres during the 1960s.
By the late 20th century, fluoridation had become common but not universal.
Decisions were largely made by local councils, often following public referendums, and some communities opted out. This contributed to a patchwork system in which roughly half of New Zealanders received fluoridated water, with notable debates in cities such as Hamilton, where fluoridation was removed and later reinstated after a public vote.
A major shift occurred with the Health (Fluoridation of Drinking Water) Amendment Act 2021, which transferred decision-making power from local councils to the Director-General of Health.
In 2022, the Director-General ordered 14 local authorities to introduce fluoridation, with implementation continuing through to 2026. Once complete, the proportion of New Zealanders with access to fluoridated water is expected to rise to around 60 per cent.
This was temporarily re-examined in November 2023, after High Court judgment found that the Director-General of Health should have explicitly considered the rights under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 in making a decision on each direction to fluoridate.
In a further judgment in February 2024, the judge directed the Director-General of Health to assess whether each of the directions for local authorities is a justified limit on the right of persons in those districts to refuse medical treatment.
As expected, the Director-General concluded that in terms of Section 5 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act, the direction to fluoridate each water supply is a “justified limitation” on the right to refuse medical treatment.
A truly sad day for our brothers and sisters across the pond.
Today, the directives continue and the plants are ‘topped up’ with the latest toxins.
Opposition groups continue to challenge both the policy and neurotoxin over its effectiveness and ethics, ensuring the issue remains politically sensitive.
There are calls to reinstate mandatory fluoridation of water in Queensland where I live, after many years of fighting from pro-choice campaigners.
Calls for Queensland to reinstate mandatory water fluoridation
RELATED ARTICLE
The struggle for freedom and human rights stops at no border or culture – it is something we all must partake in to ensure it survives.
Keep fighting, Kiwis! The tide can always shift in the opposite direction!
KEEP UP-TO-DATE
For more TOTT News:
Facebook — Facebook.com/TOTTNews
YouTube — YouTube.com/TOTTNews
Instagram — Instagram.com/TOTTNews
Twitter — Twitter.com/EthanTOTT
Rumble — Rumble.com/c/TOTTNews
Bitchute — Bitchute.com/channel/TOTTNews
Gab — Gab.com/TOTTNews
The NZ “controllers” must be worried that, even with the mass poisoning/killing provided by the Convid1984 Ja[b]cinda, too many Kiwis are waking up to the reality that their “public health” officials are inaptly titled, and are actually trying to weaken and kill the public. More poisoning is called for. Fluoride has never been demonstrated, in well-conducted, properly controlled studies, to have reduced tooth decay, and it is a neurotoxin and increases the risk of brittle bones/arthritis-like conditions. It has no place being in the human body.