Photo: ANB
Time for ‘Plan B’?
AUSTRALIA VOTES NO
Australians have rejected the establishment of a divisive Voice to Parliament advisory body.
The referendum was defeated — a result that was declared quite early this evening. Some analysts called the result at 7:25pm AEDT — a little more than an hour after polls closed in most of the eastern states.
Tasmania was the first to be declared as a No state, followed by New South Wales and South Australia.
Because at least four states needed to vote Yes for the referendum to pass, the defeat was declared before results were known for the other three states. By this point, polls hadn’t even closed in WA.
A massive thumping for the controversial Yes campaign that was filled mixed messages and hidden cultural marxist agendas, signifying a bump in the road for part of the centralised land takeover plan.
But in defeat, could this effort actually be used for something just (if not more) sinister?
Just as quick as the referendum has been called, it seems it will be now used to fulfil another agenda.
RESULT WEAPONISED?
We all know that the establishment often plays multiple cards as part of the same events, and we also know they don’t take ‘defeat’ lightly on the path to Agenda 2030.
To give context, let’s not forget that the Australian government is currently drafting a chilling bill against ‘misinformation’ on social media platforms at the moment:
Now, what are the odds that within hours of this result, the Yes campaign are already crying out that so-called ‘online misinformation’ played a huge part in skewing referendum voting:
From politicians to supporters of the average public, many are saying that a “Trumpian campaign” of ‘misinformation’ was the only reason this was able to happen this way:
Even the Prime Minister, just hours ago in his post-result speech, questioned whether ‘everything happened the way it should have’ with discussion points during the campaign:
NWO-backed publications like The Guardian have also begun to run with these headlines:
Yes, it was a “dark victory for misinformation”, say the PR-talking points following in suit.
It seems, in standing up to stop one key part of the agenda, the voting public may have now given the same people the ‘ammo’ to start driving home their ‘misinformation’ censorship campaign.
We shall wait to see what happens over the coming weeks and months.
If anything, though, the result shows us Australians may be a little bit more opposed to the tricks.
Meaning, we are hopefully ready for whatever ‘new branch’ they decide to break off into.
Well done, Australia. But stay vigilante!
KEEP UP-TO-DATE
For more TOTT News:
Facebook — Facebook.com/TOTTNews
YouTube — YouTube.com/TOTTNews
Instagram — Instagram.com/TOTTNews
Twitter — Twitter.com/EthanTOTT
Bitchute — Bitchute.com/TOTTNews
Gab — Gab.com/TOTTNews
Stay vigilant indeed. A small victory, but of course the war continues. The demonic forces and their political puppets will just move onto their next scheme to help enslave humanity. Plan A didn’t work, so it’s onto B, C, D, E….
Most of the people who I know voted NO never even read the so called “misinformation” they made up their minds for various reasons, many older people who only watch MSM and don’t use the internet too. My first suspicions were about the tax payers money being used to push a yes vote was very biased and the attacks on people who wanted to vote NO. If a Government wants something so bad then something has to be not right.
A really good documentary on Vice last night about capitalism and how the elites pass down their wealth and keep land ownership, shows the insight into how it is all about land grab and ownership.
Yes I’m sure they have something else up their sleeve and the misinformation Bill would be the most likely one. A never ending fight!
We older people did not listen to the ‘misinformation’. We did not want Australia divided by race so the NO vote was the only way forward.
Excactly! True equality will never happen if we continue to treat any race, colour or religion differently, we all know there are good and bad in all.
A result to savour. But as Ethan and the above commenters caution, the global-parasites and their legion of lackeys, gofers, shills, traitors will keep trying to dump tyranny upon us.
In the meantime we can celebrate yesterday’s comprehensive rejection of the referendum. Here is a suitable musical contribution, which was posted on Cory Bernardi’s Confidential Daily last night:
Love it!
new format?
The problem I have with the whole thing is that there are people who think and identify as aborigine however they are only aborigine in their own imaginations. They are white mixed race Australians who, looking for something to make themselves standout because they would go unnoticed otherwise seek refuge in claiming to be different and need different laws and privileges just for them. They are frightened and need to belong to a minority because it is there they can lay claim to having some mystic attachment to the soil and claims of victim hood. Well its over for you now. Australians are only interested in helping the most marginalised. To the rest of the Aboriginal Industry your days are numbered we are coming for you!! The Academics and Activists have now got a target on their backs and you are all visible now and we all now know your foul intent!! I want the oxygen in the debate taken out of the room and the Academics and Activists who cooked this up suffocated in silence. I dont ever want to hear from the likes of Marcia Langton, Megan Davis, Thomas Mayor, Tom Calma, Lidia Thorpe, Noel Pearson, Pat Dodson, Mick Dodson, Rachel Perkins, John Farnham, Peter Garratt ever again. They are now IRRELEVANT
I don’t know what the law says but even if their ancestory goes way back to one Indigenous person they can then claim they are, no proof needed as far as I know, need to investigate this, and then get any privelges or assistance that is available, leaving out those who most need it. We can all trace our own ancestory to who knows where.
Perhaps EVERYONE could ‘ IDentify as Indigenous’- The UNITED PEOPLES of Australia! What happens then?
Wellness
Well what makes someone Indigenous, born here? Parents born here? Grandparents born here? And so on….
Well since the voice fail on a national level, maybe they’ll try it on a state by state basis next. Hell South Australia has already enacted legislation back in march of this year establishing a voice(s) to their parliament!
https://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/lz?path=/c/a/first%20nations%20voice%20act%202023
Well of course every chance they will, let the state control it instead, just like what happened in the last 3 years and still ongoing. ACT will be the first.
Interesting — thanks for the scoop Nathan!