Government says it is ‘sorry’.
Photo: SKI

Herding clueless youngsters towards the jab.

NO INFORMED CONSENT

Questions have been raised about whether thousands of teenagers received sufficient information about potential COVID-19 jab risks before being vaccinated at a mass immunisation centre in Sydney during the ‘pandemic’ in 2021.

NSW Health has acknowledged shortcomings in the information provided to Year 12 students during a mass COVID-19 vaccination programme at Sydney’s Qudos Bank Arena, prompting scrutiny of informed consent procedures during the dystopian period.

Approximately 20,000 Year 12 students attended the vaccination hub, where they received the Pfizer COVID-19 jab as part of the state’s efforts to accelerate uptake among school leavers ahead of their final examinations.

The issue came to light following a complaint from a father whose two teenage daughters were vaccinated at the centre.

The father raised concerns with the NSW Health Care Complaints Commission (HCCC), arguing that the information made available to students did not adequately explain the potential risks associated with the Pfizer vaccine, particularly myocarditis and pericarditis.

Myocarditis is inflammation of the heart muscle, while pericarditis affects the membrane surrounding the heart. Both conditions were recognised as adverse effects associated with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, particularly among adolescent males following a second dose.

According to reports, students were directed to vaccination information through a QR code.

The father questioned whether this information provided sufficient detail for young people to make an informed decision about receiving the vaccine.

In its response, Western Sydney Local Health District (WSLHD) issued an apology acknowledging that its service had “fallen short” in ensuring patients received adequate information to support informed consent.

“WSLHD extends their apologies to you and your daughters that their service fell short in ensuring patients are provided with sufficient information to allow informed consent to occur.”

The acknowledgement is significant, because informed consent is a fundamental principle of medical practice. Patients should be given relevant information about the benefits, risks, and alternatives to a proposed medical intervention before agreeing to treatment.

The issue is particularly important when medical procedures involve minors.

Under NSW law, teenagers may be capable of providing their own consent to medical treatment, depending on their age, maturity, and understanding of the proposed treatment.

However, the existence of a vaccination programme or government recommendation does not remove the responsibility to provide appropriate information.

The complaint also raises broader questions about how consent was obtained during the extraordinary circumstances of the ‘pandemic’, when governments and health authorities were under considerable pressure to increase vaccination rates quickly.

How many others were also not given the liberty of receiving detailed information about the jab? Aged-care facilities? Hospitals? Public service?

At the time, myocarditis and pericarditis were recognised safety concerns associated with Pfizer vaccination – so communicating relevant risks was an important part of enabling individuals and families to make informed decisions.

The government did not do that.

Let’s not forget that COVID-19 vaccine adverse reaction reports show a 500% increase in comparison to 78 different vaccines combined over a 40 year period.

COVID jab adverse events are significantly higher than EVERY other vaccine COMBINED
RELATED FEATURE

Of all the vaccine campaigns that absolutely needed clear messaging, it was this one.

The apology raises legitimate questions about whether the information provided at the mass vaccination centre was sufficiently comprehensive, particularly given the age of the students and the known potential adverse effects.

Despite admitting their mistake, the HCCC reportedly has decided not to take further action – finding ‘no departure from acceptable standards’. NSW Health also maintained that its procedures were ‘consistent with government guidance’.

A clown show of the highest order, folks.

Especially considering official advice surrounding COVID-19 vaccinations for children has now changed, with health authorities no longer recommending they should have the jab.

COVID jab no longer recommended for infants and children in Australia
RELATED ARTICLE

How many of these students will end up with lifelong ailments due to not being able to fully comprehend the risks associated with them? Pick your poison:

Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine may trigger serious eye problems, reveals study
RELATED ARTICLE

Exploring the Link Between Brain Inflammation and COVID Vaccines
RELATED ARTICLE

Why Does Australia Now Have the World’s Highest Rate of Bowel Cancer Under 50?
RELATED ARTICLE

Let’s hope they are not the next young victim to be the subject of a full coronial inquiry, like we have already witnessed happen here in Australia.

Coronial inquest likely for COVID vaccine death of 21-year-old Aussie
RELATED ARTICLE

Shame on NSW Health authorities who decided that ‘stopping the spread’ and potentially maiming thousands of children was more important than informed consent practices.

Australians with the ‘eyes to see’ will never forget your crimes.