Do they know something we don’t?

---

2025 ‘CRISIS TEST’

It seems like once again – as is always the case with any major world story – the ‘powers that be’ were already simulating ‘crisis scenarios’ right before the event actually occurred.

In 2025, an Australian government agency conducted a large-scale simulation that tested how governments, industry, and emergency services would respond to “multiple, overlapping disasters” – including testing a widespread fuel shortage scenario.

‘Exercise Convergence 2025’ was run by the National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) in May 2025, with the exercise bringing together more than 300 participants from federal, state and local governments, alongside private sector operators and stakeholders.

Its purpose was to “stress-test” Australia’s ability to manage “complex, fast-moving national emergencies in an era of increasing risk”.

Among the most significant and revealing components of the exercise was a scenario involving a severe fuel shortage. In this simulation, Australia experienced a sudden and dramatic reduction in fuel imports – estimated at up to 70 to 75 per cent – triggered by global disruption and compounded by domestic logistical constraints.

The scenario quickly demonstrated how deeply fuel underpins the functioning of the national economy, as we are experiencing right now.

As supplies tightened, the impacts spread far beyond transport.

Emergency services faced immediate pressure to maintain operations, forcing difficult decisions about fuel prioritisation for police, fire, and ambulance fleets.

At the same time, freight networks began to falter, raising the prospect of empty supermarket shelves and interruptions to food supply chains.

Healthcare systems were also exposed. Hospitals, reliant on steady deliveries and diesel-powered backup generators, faced mounting logistical challenges.

Critical infrastructure, including electricity, telecommunications and water services, came under strain as fuel shortages threatened the continuity of essential operations.

The exercise was not simply the availability of fuel, but its distribution. Even where limited supplies remained, bottlenecks in transport and delivery systems created further disruption.

The situation was exacerbated by simulated public behaviour, including panic buying at petrol stations and the ‘rapid spread of misinformation online’.

Participants found that managing communication and maintaining public confidence became as important as managing the physical resource itself.

The exercise also highlighted the complexity of governance in such a crisis.

Fuel shortages do not respect jurisdictional boundaries, requiring rapid coordination between federal and state authorities, industry stakeholders and, potentially, defence forces.

Questions around who should control allocation, how rationing should be implemented, and how to balance economic stability with public need “proved challenging”.

Just six months later, the Iran ‘war’ would begin, and fuel shakeups hit almost immediately.

What are the odds of such a simulation occurring right before the actual crisis?

Pretty high if you have paid attention to any other major world event in recent history.

Fuel wasn’t the only thing they simulated at the exercise, either.

Unlike traditional disaster exercises that focus on a single event, Exercise Convergence adopted an “all-hazards” approach.

Participants were confronted with simultaneous crises, including severe weather events, cyber disruptions, biosecurity threats and major supply chain failures.

This, they say, reflects a growing concern among policymakers that modern emergencies are rarely isolated, instead unfolding as interconnected shocks that strain multiple systems.

Could other scenarios they tested be soon coming true as well?

As Australia continues to confront a changing landscape, we must ask the question: Did the ‘insight’ gained from this exercise inform what would soon become a future ‘emergency’?

Why do we always find simulated events or test drills happening around the exact same time as said instances actually emerging?

Something is a little fishy, ladies and gentlemen.

ALWAYS A SIMULATION

If you have been paying close attention to anything that has shaken society over the past few decades, you would have recognised a very familiar pattern emerge.

That pattern? Drills or tests happening around the exact same time.

The most prominent example of this has to be the COVID ‘pandemic’ period.

Who remembers when the “high-level pandemic simulation”, known as Event 201, was conducted in October 2019 in New York – just a couple of months before the ‘real’ one.

Participants were tasked with responding to a fictional scenario involving a fast-spreading coronavirus originating from animals and transmitting efficiently between humans.

In the simulation, the ‘virus’ spread rapidly across continents, overwhelming healthcare systems, and disrupting global supply chains.

With no immediate vaccine available, the hypothetical ‘pandemic’ resulted in tens of millions of deaths over an 18-month period, forcing leaders to confront complex decisions on travel restrictions, economic shutdowns, and the management of public information.

The exercise was organised by the Johns Hopkins Centre for Health Security, in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Just a few months after this simulation occurred, we began seeing these exact things.

Organisers said the purpose of the exercise was to ‘identify gaps in pandemic preparedness’ and to ‘emphasise the need for stronger international coordination’.

Following the ‘outbreak of COVID-19’ just months later, Event 201 attracted significant public attention due to similarities between the simulation and real-world events.

This should have been enough of a red flag for anyone to see through the COVID lies.

And this event was not alone in pre-planned simulations or tests, either.

Who remembers all of the ‘training drills’ that seem to always be happening around the exact same time as so-called ‘terrorist’ events?

We have repeatedly witnessed this type of scenario play out.

Is it just a ‘coincidence’ that authorities were preparing for events soon to occur?

Time and time again, this playbook has become evident in massive news-breaking events.

What about Cyber Polygon? Who remembers that?

The large-scale cybersecurity exercise that was held in 2019 – organised by the World Economic Forum, in partnership with BI.ZONE?

World Economic Forum to stage cyber attack simulation
RELATED ARTICLE

The main idea behind ‘Cyber Polygon’ was to simulate major cyberattacks on global infrastructure – things like supply chains, financial systems, and corporate networks – to ‘help governments and companies practice responding to large-scale cyber crises’.

Participants included major corporations, financial institutions, and government agencies from dozens of countries – all running live simulations of cyberattacks.

There were also public discussions and panels about cybersecurity risks, digital transformation, and ‘global co-operation’.

And what soon followed?

The SolarWinds cyberattack – which was a major supply-chain breach uncovered in December 2020 that compromised thousands of organisations worldwide.

Attackers infiltrated SolarWinds’ Orion software updates, enabling them to access sensitive networks across U.S. government agencies and private companies.

It is considered one of the most sophisticated cyberespionage campaigns in history.

Organisations impacted included the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of the Treasury, Microsoft, and numerous Fortune 500 firms.

Must be just another ‘coincidence’, folks – nothing to see here.

These are just a couple of examples out of numerous similar happenings.

In fact, this type of thing happens so often, when I saw our current fuel crisis was already simulated last year – the response was ‘of course’, rather than shock.

Of course it has happened again.

I would be more shocked if a training drill did not occur, to be honest.

What are your thoughts on this discovery? Did you also react the same?

Let me know your thoughts in the comment section below!

---

---

KEEP UP-TO-DATE

For more TOTT News:

Facebook — Facebook.com/TOTTNews

YouTube — YouTube.com/TOTTNews

Instagram — Instagram.com/TOTTNews

Twitter — Twitter.com/EthanTOTT

Rumble — Rumble.com/c/TOTTNews

Bitchute — Bitchute.com/channel/TOTTNews

Gab — Gab.com/TOTTNews

---

---