October 1, 2023

52 thoughts on “New Australian law allows forced quarantine or jail to ‘prevent suspected disease’

  1. some of the extensive information on the dangers of vaccinations:-
    Duty to Warn

    Aluminum and the Neurotoxicity of Vaccines

    (Information that the Vaccine Industry tries to keep hidden)

    By Gary G. Kohls, MD
    “No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable…for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death.” — President Ronald Reagan, as he signed The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986, absolving drug companies from all medico-legal liability when children die or are disabled from vaccine injuries.
    “In young children, a highly significant correlation exists between the number of pediatric aluminum-adjuvanted vaccines administered and the rate of autism spectrum disorders.” — C. A. Shaw, MD, Vaccine safety researcher
    “…no adequate studies have been conducted to assess the safety of simultaneous administration of different vaccines to young children.” Nor has there been “ any toxicological evaluation about concomitant administration of aluminum with other known toxic compounds which are routine constituents of commercial vaccine preparations, e.g., formaldehyde, formalin, mercury, phenoxyethanol, phenol, sodium borate, polysorbate 80, glutaraldehyde.” — L. Tomljenovic and C.A. Shaw, Vaccine safety researchers
    In the last few decades since the “mysterious” autism epidemic began in the late 1980s, the giant pharmaceutical companies, free from the constraints of medico-legal liability, began pumping out more and more highly profitable vaccines, and their lobbyists in D.C., their well-paid spokespersons and the industry-co-opted “regulatory agencies” (like WHO, the CDC, the FDA and NIH) rejoiced.

    Then, in 1996, the Big Pharma corporate machine and lobbyists got the US Congress to do its bidding and legalize direct-to-consumer advertising for its products, which up to then was illegal. And Big Pharma has also been bribing most US Congresspersons with lavish campaign donations and totally dominated the mainstream media debates that come up from time to time concerning drug and vaccine injuries, intoxication, sickness and death.. Up until now they have also succeeded in silencing the thousands of anguished parents of vaccine-injured children who are just trying to tell their tragic stories.

    At least partly because of the dire financial consequences that these industries may have to face if the stories were to be widely told, these parents and their advocates have been essentially black-balled by every media outlet that takes advertising dollars from Big Pharma. The black-listing is probably welcome to everybody associated with Big Pharma’s industries, like Wall Street executives, Big Media executives and others in the investor classes that may have pharmaceutical stocks in their portfolios (or are simply on friendly terms with medical or pharmaceutical establishment types that don’t want to destabilize the gravy train).

    Tens of thousands of angry and increasingly vocal “Mama Bear” mothers, are no longer willing to accept the excuse from their clinics that “the neurological catastrophe that your child suffered after the shots was just a coincidence”. And they are demanding an audience, some compassion, some help and some compensation for their losses.

    These usually disrespected parents are sometimes fired from their clinics when they try to protect their afflicted child from further vaccine injury. There is no doubt in their minds that, after their child got his standard “well-child” inoculations, that previously healthy baby or toddler died of SIDS or regressed into autism (or had other developmental delays) or started having seizures or developed autoimmune disorders such as allergies or asthma or arthritis or so-called ADHD.

    (It must be mentioned that the various combinations of inoculations have never been proven to be safe or even effective in unbiased, independent, well-designed, long-term studies. With no legal liability since 1986, the vaccine industry has very little incentive to make that effort.)

    But these parents are persistent and they are continuing to speak up despite being routinely shouted down by the ubiquitous pro-vaccine spokespersons that are invited to appear on radio and TV shows whenever vaccine issues are discussed in the media. Pro-vaccine spokespersons are everywhere (like the multimillionaire academic pediatrician Dr Paul Offit, who developed an anti-diarrhea rotavirus vaccine (Rotateq), and then sold – for tens of millions of dollars – the patents and marketing rights to the giant vaccine manufacturer Merck & Co.

    Offit has a lot of prestige to lose if the raw truth about America’s over-vaccination program came out. (Dr Offit, by the way, is the “vaccine expert” who says that all vaccines are perfectly safe and once reportedly said that infants can theoretically tolerate 10,000 of them at once: (See “Addressing Parents’ Concerns: Do Multiple Vaccines Overwhelm or Weaken the Infant’s Immune System?” Pediatrics. 2002 Jan;109(1):124-9.)

    Many of the parents whose children are victims of vaccine-injuries have enough common sense to see through the absurdity of Offit’s statement. They know how to find pertinent information on PubMed that their physicians may not be aware of concerning the toxicity of vaccines and vaccine adjuvants, and they are connecting the dots and de-mystifying the causes behind the epidemic of chronic, autoimmune disorders that are occurring in fully vaccinated American children. Those chronic illnesses do not happen in unvaccinated or minimally-vaccinated children like in Amish communities or in the patients of Home First Clinic in Chicago. (For more on that see ”Make an Informed Vaccine Decision”, page 12, where author Mayer Eisenstein, MD, JD, MPH, who started the Home First Clinic [and did not force vaccinations on his 35,000 pediatric patients] discovered that, among his un-vaccinated or minimally-vaccinated patients, there were essentially zero patients with autism, asthma, allergies or diabetes.)

    Knowledgeable parents of vaccine-age children correctly fear the rapidly increasing numbers of mandated vaccines all of which have many toxic ingredients in them that are being injected into the bodies of their immune-deficient infants. And the vaccine doses do not vary no matter what is the infant’s age, weight, developmental status, immune status, mitochondrial status, nutritional status, or whether or not the child is currently sick.
    Because of the large amount of new basic science studies that have been done on the subject of the neurotoxic vaccine adjuvant aluminum and the recent studies about the mitochondrial toxicity of vaccine ingredients, I submit the abstracts and portions of articles below from a variety of peer-reviewed medical journals.

    Aluminum, as is mercury, is a known potent mitochondrial toxin, and every cell in the body, especially the brain cells of infants, is highly susceptible to permanent damage from those two heavy metals, especially when they are used in combination and especially when they are injected – as was the case during the 1990s when the autism epidemic was escalating from rare (1/10,000 to “normal” (1/150).

    The first article is from the journal Lupus and the second is from Current Medicinal Chemistry. Neither journal takes pharmaceutical company advertising.
    Lupus. 2012 Feb;21(2):223-30. doi: 10.1177/0961203311430221.
    Tomljenovic L, Shaw CA.


    Immune challenges during early development, including those vaccine-induced, can lead to permanent detrimental alterations of the brain and immune function. Experimental evidence also shows that simultaneous administration of as little as two to three immune adjuvants can overcome genetic resistance to autoimmunity.
    In some developed countries, by the time children are 4 to 6 years old, they will have received a total of 126 antigenic compounds along with high amounts of aluminum (Al) adjuvants through routine vaccinations.
    According to the US Food and Drug Administration, safety assessments for vaccines have often not included appropriate toxicity studies because vaccines have not been viewed as inherently toxic.
    Taken together, these observations raise plausible concerns about the overall safety of current childhood vaccination programs. When assessing adjuvant toxicity in children, several key points ought to be considered:
    (1) Infants and children should not be viewed as “small adults” with regard to toxicological risk as their unique physiology makes them much more vulnerable to toxic insults;
    (2) In adult humans (and animals) aluminum vaccine adjuvants have been linked to a variety of serious autoimmune and inflammatory conditions (i.e., ASIA = Autoimmune [auto-inflammatory] Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants), yet children are regularly exposed to much higher amounts of Al from vaccines than adults;
    (3) It is often assumed that peripheral immune responses do not affect brain function. However, it is now clearly established that there is a bidirectional neuro-immune cross-talk that plays crucial roles in immune-regulation as well as brain function. In turn, perturbations of the neuro-immune axis have been demonstrated in many autoimmune diseases encompassed in “ASIA” and are thought to be driven by a hyperactive immune response; and
    (4) The same components of the neuro-immune axis that play key roles in brain development and immune function are heavily targeted by Al adjuvants.
    In summary, research evidence shows that increasing concerns about current vaccination practices may indeed be warranted.
    Because children may be most at risk of vaccine-induced complications, a rigorous evaluation of the vaccine-related adverse health impacts in the pediatric population is urgently needed.

    Aluminum Vaccine Adjuvants: Are they Safe?

    Curr Med Chem. 2011;18(17):2630-7

    L. Tomljenovic, and C.A. Shaw (article accepted for publication May 12, 2011)

    Neural Dynamics Research Group, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, the Departments of Ophthalmology, Visual Sciences and Experimental Medicine, and the Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of British Columbia, 828 W. 10th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L8, Canada

    Full journal article available at: http://www.meerwetenoverfreek.nl/images/stories/Tomljenovic_Shaw-CMC-published.pdf


    Aluminum is an experimentally demonstrated neurotoxin and the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant. Despite almost 90 years of widespread use of aluminum adjuvants, medical science’s understanding about their mechanisms of action is still remarkably poor. There is also a concerning scarcity of data on toxicology and pharmacokinetics of these compounds. In spite of this, the notion that aluminum in vaccines is safe appears to be widely accepted.

    Experimental research, however, clearly shows that aluminum adjuvants have a potential to induce serious immunological disorders in humans. In particular, aluminum in adjuvant form carries a risk for autoimmunity, long-term brain inflammation and associated neurological complications and may thus have profound and widespread adverse health consequences.

    In our opinion, the possibility that vaccine benefits may have been overrated and the risk of potential adverse effects underestimated, has not been rigorously evaluated in the medical and scientific community. We hope that the present paper will provide a framework for a much needed and long overdue assessment of this highly contentious medical issue.

    Keywords: Aluminum adjuvants, adjuvant safety, autoimmunity, autism, Gulf War Syndrome, multiple sclerosis, macrophagic myofasciitis, neurotoxicity, seizures, Th2 immune response, vaccines.


    Aluminum is the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant and until recently the only one licensed for use in the U.S. In its absence, antigenic components of most vaccines (with the exception of live attenuated vaccines), fail to launch an adequate immune response. Paradoxically, despite almost 90 years of widespread use of aluminum adjuvants their precise mechanism of action remains poorly understood.

    Furthermore, a growing number of studies have linked the use of aluminum adjuvants to serious autoimmune outcomes in humans. That concerns about aluminum adjuvant safety are indeed warranted is evident from the summary conclusions of the Aluminum in Vaccines workshop held in Puerto Rico in 2000 [Eickhoff, T.C.; Myers, M. Workshop summary. Aluminum in vaccines. Vaccine. 2002, 20 Suppl 3, S1-4.]. The written consensus amongst the participants of the workshop was listed under the rubric of “pervasive uncertainty”, a term used to denote what remained unknown regarding potential aluminum toxicity from adjuvants.

    The specific areas of concern were: “1) toxicology and pharmacokinetics, specifically the processing of aluminum by infants and children, 2) mechanisms by which aluminum adjuvants interact with the immune system and 3) the necessity of adjuvants in booster doses.” In the concluding paragraphs of the summary, the report nevertheless claimed that “the use of salts of aluminum as adjuvants in vaccines has proven to be safe and effective” [2]. In light of the items of “pervasive uncertainty”, this statement remains questionable.

    Given that multiple aluminum-adjuvanted vaccines are often given to very young children (i.e., 2 to 6 months of age), in a single day at individual vaccination sessions, concerns for potential impacts of total adjuvant-derived aluminum body burden may be significant. These issues warrant serious consideration since, to the best of our knowledge, no adequate studies have been conducted to assess the safety of simultaneous administration of different vaccines to young children.

    Another issue of concern is the lack of any toxicological evaluation about concomitant administration of aluminum with other known toxic compounds which are routine constituents of commercial vaccine preparations, e.g., formaldehyde, formalin, mercury, phenoxyethanol, phenol, sodium borate, polysorbate 80, glutaraldehyde.

    In spite of all this, aluminum adjuvants are generally regarded as safe, and some researchers have even recommended that no further research efforts should be spent on this topic despite “a lack of good-quality evidence”.

    In the following paper we aim to provide an overview of what is currently known about aluminum adjuvants, their modes of action and mechanisms of potential toxicity. We first present well-established evidence that implicates aluminum in a variety of neurological disorders. We then elaborate on the unresolved controversy about aluminum adjuvant safety.

    Aluminum Toxicity in Animals and Humans

    Aluminum is a well demonstrated toxin in biological systems whose more specific
    impacts on the nervous system have been widely documented. As early as 1911, Dr. William Gies had summarized data from 7 years-worth of experimental testing in humans and animals on the effects of oral consumption of aluminum salts, then used primarily in baking powders, food preservation, and dye manufacturing. The outcome of these studies led Gies to conclude that: “the use in food of aluminum or any other aluminum compound is a dangerous practice.”

    Gies’ concerns have since been borne out by experimental studies showing that oral exposure to aluminum that is at levels “typically” consumed in an average “Western diet” over an extended period of time, produce strikingly similar outcomes in rodents to those induced by intracerebral injection of aluminum salts with the exception of seizures and fatalities.

    Animals intoxicated with dietary aluminum routinely show impaired performance in learning and memory tasks, impaired concentration, and behavioural changes including confusion and repetitive behaviours. Consistent with these observations, according to the most recent and elaborate toxicological report for aluminum prepared by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR): “There is a rather extensive database on the oral toxicity of aluminum in animals. These studies clearly identify the nervous system as the most sensitive target of aluminum toxicity.”

    In humans, aluminum toxicity has been solidly linked to dialysis-associated encephalopathy syndrome, also known as dialysis dementia. This syndrome occurs in patients with renal failure subjected to chronic dialysis treatment and is caused by accumulation of intravenously administered aluminum from the dialysis fluid (which is derived from aluminum-treated tap water). Dialysis dementia is associated with abnormally high levels of plasma and brain aluminum and is generally fatal within 3 to 7 months following the sudden overt manifestation of clinical symptoms in patients who had been on dialysis treatment for 3 to 7 years (unless treated with chelating agent such as desferrioxamine (DFO) or reverse osmosis to remove aluminum salts from the water used to prepare the dialysis fluid). Symptoms appear suddenly and worsen either during or immediately after a dialysis session. The first symptom to appear is a speech abnormality, then tremors, impaired psychomotor control, memory losses, impaired concentration, behavioural changes, epileptic seizures, coma and death.

    Although frequent ingestion of aluminum-containing medicines was also thought to be a contributing factor in dialysis dementia it should be noted that there were no incidences of this syndrome prior to introduction of aluminum salts in water supplies [21, 27]. Furthermore, symptomatic patients rapidly improved when efforts were made to remove aluminum from the dialysis fluid, despite the fact they still ingested large amounts of aluminum-containing phosphate binding gels.

    In addition to dialysis dementia, a host of neurodegenerative complications and diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) [Perl, D.P.; Moalem, S. [Aluminum and Alzheimer’s disease, a personal perspective after 25 years. J Alzheimers Dis. 2006, 9(3 Suppl), 291-300.], multiple sclerosis, Gulf War Syndrome (GWS), autism, and epilepsy may also be related to aluminum exposure. While it is likely that these diseases are of multifactorial etiologies, aluminum certainly has the potential to serve as a toxic co-factor.


    Aluminum in various forms can be toxic to the nervous system. The widespread presence in the human environment may underlie a number of CNS disorders. The continued use of aluminum adjuvants in various vaccines for children as well as the general public may be of significant concern.

    In particular, aluminum presented in this form carries a risk for autoimmunity, long-term brain inflammation and associated neurological complications and may thus have profound and widespread adverse health consequences. The widely accepted notion of aluminum adjuvant safety does not appear to be firmly established in the scientific literature and, as such, this absence may have led to erroneous conclusions regarding the significance of these compounds in the etiologies of many common neurological disorders. Furthermore, the continued use of aluminum-containing placebos in vaccine clinical trials may have led to an underestimation of the true rate of adverse outcomes associated with aluminum-adjuvanted vaccines.

    In our opinion, a comprehensive evaluation of the overall impact of aluminum on human health is overdue. Such an evaluation should include studies designed to determine the short and long-term impacts of dietary aluminum as well as the potential impacts in different age groups of exposure to adjuvant aluminum alone and in combination with other potentially toxic vaccine constituents (e.g., formaldehyde, formalin, mercury, phenoxyethanol, phenol, sodium borate, polysorbate 80, glutaraldehyde).

    For the latter, until vaccine safety can be comprehensively demonstrated by controlled independent long-term studies that examine the impact on the nervous system in detail, many of those already vaccinated as well as those currently receiving injections may be at risk for health complications that exceed the potential benefits that vaccine prophylaxis may provide.

    The issue of aluminum-adjuvanted vaccine safety is especially pertinent in light of the legislation which might mandate vaccination regimes for civilian populations (e.g., the Biodefense and Pandemic Vaccine and Drug Development Act of 2005). Whether the risk of protection from a dreaded disease outweighs the risk of toxicity from its presumed prophylactic agent is a question that demands far more rigorous scrutiny than has been provided to date.

    REFERENCES (and full article) available at:http://www.meerwetenoverfreek.nl/images/stories/Tomljenovic_Shaw-CMC-published.pdf
    Dr Kohls is a retired physician from Duluth, MN. Prior to his retirement, he practiced holistic (non-drug) mental health care. He writes a weekly column for the Duluth Reader, an alternative newsweekly magazine (www.readerduluth.com). His columns often deal with issues of mental health, drug/vaccine toxicity and the epidemic of malnutrition.

    1. You can go to any research paper that confirms your beliefs and find an article to prove to others that vaccinations cause autism but it has been scientifically proven to be false.
      I know this from personal experience and from thorough research from up to date scientific research. Stop spreading lies and preventing children from receiving life saving vaccinations.

      1. You’ve opened your argument with my defence.

        You believe they are safe, you too, found shabby research to support your asinine opinion.

        You assert that a view counter your own limited scope are lies, and that injections of known neurotoxins and exogenous matter save lives..

        You reveal your imbecility with aplomb.


    2. Wow…a wall of text that looks like it quotes studies and actual papers written by real people. It even has URL’s. Must be legit. I will believe anything you say because it looks credible at first glance and there are other like minded people who think the same thing. Because of those 2 things – it must be 100% true regardless of what anybody else says or proves with scientific and peer reviewed evidence. Thanks 4 da share. xoxo

  2. Who is going to challenge the government on this one. It appears that it is not sufficient to accept quarantine. Someone can actually force you, against your own will to be taken to a medical facility and forcibly injected with a toxic brew of vaccines. Apparently the fact that Herd Immunity is only a theory, and a hotly contested one at that does not matter. The fact that quarantine aught to provide the most effective control does not matter.

    1. I know of parents who have a notice written up asking the doctor who is injecting their children to sign taken full responsibility for side effects, illness their children may suffer due to the forced immunisation and stating their children are very healthy prior to the injection. So far doctors have refused to sign. If these injections are safe, my question is WHY wont they sign. I believe this Corporate Government are acting in a criminal manner towards our most vulnerable then blame the parent for what happens to their children.

  3. Another warning to the Australian Government about Dementia and ‘water fluoridation chemicals’. This warning also is relevant to the neurotoxic aluminium in vaccines – both these Government ‘activities’ is very serious indeed – Government tells us that we have an unsustainable ‘health system’ due to the heavy demand – and we say stop water fluoridation which is forced on the population and stop ‘forcing’ vaccinations – together this must be stopped by the people. (See hereunder for that information). DDB

    Fluoride’s final frontier?
    This could be the killer argument against fluoridation.
    There’s a new kid on the block, one who is going to force the public sector to start taking notice of what we, the people, want from our medical services. I’ve already mentioned the work that Prof. Chris Exley has been doing on aluminium poisoning, and how it ties in with both the excesses of compulsory water fluoridation and the poisoning of my own community in Cornwall, almost 30 years ago.

    And I’ve warned you that aluminium in our food and water is implicated in the rising tide of dementia, and that fluoride could simply be making it worse. Now he’s challenging the medical establishment, right in the heart of its corrupt soul. He is inviting us all to get involved in a crucial experiment that could solve the dementia problem once and for all.

    He’s found that aluminium in our bodies can be removed, easily, painlessly – and cheaply – by simply drinking couple of glasses of silica-rich mineral a day – water that you can buy off the shelves at your local Supermarket! Now he wants to run a People’s Clinical Trial, to find out if his discovery can lead to a way to eliminating what is almost certainly the most important stimulus in the onset of dementia.
    Of course, nobody in either government or industry will fund such an apparently ridiculous idea – but he’s already shown that it does work, with real Alzheimer’s patients. So that’s where we all come in now – how much would you pay to help to find a way to ensure that your own kids won’t have to face that awful condition of dementia when they are old?

    A preventive treatment to stop dementia is the Holy Grail of medicine, and since fluoridation is utterly incompatible with this vital discovery, all of us who oppose fluoridation now have an additional cause for denouncing this disreputable ‘public health’ practice.

    If Chris’ study gets the funding he needs, it will set a precedent for a revolutionary ‘people-centred’ approach to medical research that could spread far more widely than this. The possibilities are endless, and have the medical sector thoroughly alarmed! So if you’ve been looking for the ultimate argument against fluoridation, take note now – and get involved! This could bring the whole Fluoridation House of Cards tumbling around the ears of the dental charlatans who have assaulted us with their fake ‘medicine’ all these years!
    Doug Cross FRSB,
    UK Councils Against Fluoridation

    Aluminum and the Neurotoxicity of Vaccines
    Read article here: http://wp.me/p460EZ-1Az

    Neuroscientist Makes It Clear Why Aluminum Adjuvants Should Not Be In Vaccines
    January 29, 2015
    After Thiomersal (mercury) in vaccines was linked to a number of human health ailments, it was removed from most vaccines that are administered today, but still remains a problem. It seems we might be on the same path when it comes to aluminum, as it has also been linked to several human health ailments such as; autism, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease  and more (as Dr. Shaw notes).
    Below is a clip of Dr. Chris Shaw, a Neuroscientist and professor at the University of British Columbia explaining the dangers of putting aluminum into vaccines as an adjuvant. Keep that word in mind: adjuvant. 
    As pointed out in the video, a common argument from the “pro-vaccine” side when it comes to vaccines that contain aluminum is that aluminum is present everywhere, that we ingest it more from our food (and other things) than we do from vaccines. This argument is completely invalid, because when it is in the form of an adjuvant within a vaccine,  as Dr. Shaw explains,  the aluminum stays in your body. That’s exactly what it’s designed to do, that’s the purpose of an adjuvant.
    On the other hand, when you accumulate aluminum in your body from food, industrial practices, or any other source, our bodies usually do a good job flushing it out. Again, when it’s in a vaccine the body does not do this, it stays in the body and this is why vaccines that contain aluminum (and other harmful toxins)  should be a cause for concern.
    The clip below is an excerpt from the OneMoreGirl documentary that Dr. Shaw made an appearance in, it’s a film that raises awareness regarding the HPV (Gardasil) vaccine. For more information on that vaccine, you can click here.
    Last month I published an article on the work of  Dr. Stephanie Seneff, a Senior Research Scientist at MIT. She also showed what can happen to a child who receives an aluminum containing vaccine (among many other scientists and researchers). You can read that article here.
    There is a reason why so many families have been compensated from the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. It’s a program we don’t really hear of, and one that completely protects pharmaceutical companies (vaccine manufacturers) from any liability whatsoever. Billions of dollars have been paid out to families with vaccine injured children.
    “Aluminum is an experimentally demonstrated neurotoxin and the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant. Despite almost 90 years of widespread use of aluminum adjuvants, medical science’s medical understanding of their mechanisms of action is still remarkably poor. There is also a concerning scarcity of data on toxicology and pharmacokinetics of these compounds. In spite of this, the notion that aluminum in vaccines is safe appears to be widely accepted.”- Dr Chris Shaw (source)
    Video – Dr. Chris Shaw: Aluminium in the Body – One More Girl Excerpts https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=FfTo35UrFPA
    “Aluminum is now being implicated as interfering with a variety of cellular and metabolic processes in the nervous system and in other tissues.” (source)
    “Experimental research clearly shows that aluminum adjuvants have a potential to induce serious immunological disorders in humans. In particular, aluminum in adjuvant form carries a risk for autoimmunity, long-term brain inflammation and associated neurological complications and may thus have profound and widespread adverse health consequences.” (source)
    If you are interested in furthering your research on this topic, there is a wealth of information available from various sources. I hope these ones are a good kick start.
    Related CE Article:
    MIT Scientist Shows What Can Happen To Children Who Receive Aluminum Containing Vaccines
    All sources have been linked within the article.

  4. Reblogged this on The GOLDEN RULE and commented:
    A Draconian and /or Orwellian step backwards for Australia.
    “The government expects the human control orders to be “seldom used” ” Let’s hope so!
    “One section of the legislation that has civil liberty campaigners questioning the authoritarian approach of the new legislation, is the section that pertains to burden of proof in suspected cases – both relating to human health and agriculture. The Bill outlines a reversing the legality surrounding burden of proof, placing it in the hands of the defendant, as opposed to the traditional approach of the prosecution.” Of course, all incidents might turn out to be just and fair. That would, however, fly in the face of current evidence of what happens in many other countries.
    Hoping that Australia sets a good example.
    Perhaps a forlorn hope, given the current push for unjustified mandatory vaccinations.

  5. Link to Our say – comment and please remember to vote you get 7 votes
    Fighting for your rights – MEDICAL ETHICS – FIRST DO NO HARM Individual Rights to Informed Consent to Treatment and Individual Rights to Refuse Treatment. The ‘ingredients’ in vaccines are disturbing to say the least, and the ‘aluminium’ is proving particularly damaging to the brain (and kidneys). (Likewise the damaging ‘fluoridation chemicals i.e. hazardous waste pollutants and co-contaminants). My only child would have been a SIDS statistic except he was so violently ill after the vaccinations, with convulsions, arching back, high pitched screaming, vomiting, gastric and body jerking that we couldn’t leave him for a minute – whilst doing that we noticed he was ‘stopping breathing’ so we walked the floor with him day and night…….the rest is history – he most certainly would have died if we had not seen for ourselves. He would have been SIDS and they would have denied it like they always do, every doctor we saw about his health problems and severe behavioural problems said to us when we told them it was caused by the vaccinations ‘no it wouldn’t have been that’ – all mainstream medicine is brainwashed / hypnotised almost, in their cult like belief that vaccinations are safe and effective, they certainly are not as countless have found out. Dr. Suzanne Humphries is a kidney specialist and medical doctor who started to notice a disturbing trend in her patients. Sadly, the vast majority of conventionally-trained doctors barely even notice a danger to the public. Those who are for vaccination tend to be very aggressive and closed off to opposing views and evidence, which is always a red flag. They use fear tactics, spread disinformation, withhold information or share only biased, one-sided data on vaccine safety. Even the prestigious Mayo Clinic advocates a “persuade rather than inform” approach and dissuades health professionals from leaving printed materials such as brochures with clients or following up with them via email. Dr. Humphries now advocates finding natural ways to take care of the body and strengthen the immune system as an alternative to vaccines. Ultimately, every person should have a choice in the matter based upon a forthright presentation of the facts about vaccine safety.

    Remember those words ‘Individual Rights to Informed Consent to Treatment’ and ‘Individual Rights to Refuse Treatment’.
    Comment and please remember to vote you get 7 votes

  6. ‘In Australia there is NO mandatory reporting of adverse vaccine reactions, nor Government compensation when vaccination fails or causes temporary or permanent damage or disability. Reporting is completely voluntary and at the discretion of the vaccine administrator…’ (VAIS). ‘Highly vaccinated populations continue to contract ‘vaccine preventable diseases’, resulting in mild and severe symptoms, serious enough to require further medical intervention and hospitalisation’ (Ibid). ‘”When licensing drugs for marketing the TGA relies on research funded and controlled by pharmaceutical companies. Too often pharmaceutical companies ‘cherry pick’ favourable evidence, and hide or ‘spin’ unfavourable evidence to support their commercial interests'” (VAIS). No surprises there, then. http://www.transformtofreedom.com

    1982, Merck, Wyeth, Lederle, & Connaught blackmailed Congress stating, they would no longer sell vaccines, ‘…unless a law was passed giving them total immunity from prosecution’ (nvic.org). Big Pharma knew they were in serious trouble when the ‘…DPT shot was causing brain inflammation and death in many children’ (ibid). ‘The live oral polio vaccine was crippling children and adults…and Americans were filing lawsuits to hold drug companies responsible for the safety of their products’ (ibid). As a result Big Pharma cannot be prosecuted for their crimes against humanity, but … The school can be; the doctor, who administered the vaccine can be. Sue them, people; until no school or doctor will touch a vaccine! We must STOP this (essentially rape) of the world’s children. http://www.transformtofreedom.com

  7. People are paranoid about communicable diseases when the threat is really benign. Let your immune system do the job it’s made to do. Feed your immune system with probiotics to make it more efficient and stop freaking out about vaccines not being given. There are so many natural things you can do to prevent getting sick. Vaccines have side effects that can be very damaging. It’s all on the insert that comes in the vax box. Research alternative immunity.

  8. Your 2015 article shows that they have been planning to launch the 2020 Coronavirus Hoax for a very long time, as an excuse for forced worldwide “vaccinations” and “testing” (during which they can inject any kind of poison into the patients, then claim the patients died from “Coronavirus”). See Jon Rappaport’s website “No More Fake News”— he’s been studying these “epidemics” for decades.

  9. All of the ongoing preparations to control humanity are only waiting on the full roll out of 5G. This is all being so thoughtfully choreographed so we are unaware of a clear long-term plan to totally control us on every level and 5G technology has already been achieved 2 years ago to piggyback controlling technology on the 5G microwaves that our consciousness will not be able to question. Game over.

  10. how can they have emergency power for a disease which has 99.99% survival rate and was never a pandemic in China and its tests are based on non recomended pcr tests which are made total faulty by falsely increasing its amplification cycle by 40% extra
    is this not misuse of position to harass people by using false reason to create a medical emergency and to give them experimental covid shots ?

    Australian people should stand against it as no one has any right to rule any one people allow others to be in power for own benefit and not to make some people to govern them. This is worse then dictatorship as government perpatrating wrong people is still presenting themselves as democratic peoples government where as they are no more that so people should question its legitimacy and stand against this total wrong decision of covid shots, covid shots are bad

Leave a Reply