Fall of Australia: An overview of ‘anti-terrorism’ legislation

An in-depth look at all three draconian laws.

Who are the real terrorists? Photo: PD

News has emerged this week that Tony Abbott is committing Australian forces back to Iraq to assist the US-led coalition fight against ‘ISIS extremists’ in the region, following a number of counter-terrorism raids and foiled ‘beheading plots’ over the past month.

As a result, the Australian government has now passed a new amendment to existing ‘anti-terrorism’ legislation to combat domestic threats at home, with two more legislative pieces expected to be introduced and passed by the end of the year.

In the following feature piece, Ethan Nash takes an in-depth look at all three stages of the new legislation, including an analysis of how media and government authorities have manipulated public perception, capitalised on pre-conceived fears to erode personal freedoms in unprecedented fashion, and set the catalyst for an Orwellian state to subtlety expand.



The Australian Government has now called for another overhaul on 05/10/17, including the introduction of a national facial recognition system.

You can find all of the details here:

Visit our Intelligence archive to stay up-to-date with new articles and developments on the subject.



Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell was supposed to be a work of fiction: A parody of a dystopic future where any dissent against the establishment is squashed by the hand of tyrannical Ministries and the propaganda of ‘Big Brother’.

Fast forward to 2014, and it seems the line between fiction and reality continues to become more blurred with each passing day, with the Australian government continuing to erode personal freedoms on a daily basis, combined with continued perpetual wars, television propaganda and educational brainwashing all at the forefront.

For those that have followed TOTT News and our work, you will be aware of the extensive coverage we have provided when it comes to intelligence operations in Australia, including increased ‘anti-terror’ powers for security agencies like ASIO in the decade following 9/11, and the erosion of civil liberties in Australia.

Despite the draconian measures already granted to intelligence organisations in Australia, new revelations from the federal government reveal that the grip of power is only going to tighten in the coming years, with one new piece of ‘anti-terrorism’ legislation rushed through Parliament this week, and two more pieces to be passed by the end of the year.

Before detailing some of the new powers granted in the new legislation, let’s take a look back at events that have transpired over the last month in Australia to ‘justify’ the introduction and passing of such heinous laws, including recent ‘terrorism’ incidences and the expansion of police and surveillance operations abroad.


ISIS was formed during the ‘civil’ wars of Syria and Libya, as the United States and Western allies trained, funded and allowed the extremists to expand in the region to take down the democratically elected governments in the region.

It was just over 4 weeks ago, the beginning of September, when ASIO were already considering raising the terrorism threat to high in the wake of supposed ‘beheading’ videos that had emerged online. Just under a week later, they were successful in their justification to do just that, and now the threat has been raised to ‘likely’.

Despite this, Prime Minister Tony Abbott says the Government has “no specific intelligence” of a plot to mount a terrorist attack. (I’d like everyone to keep this in mind whilst reading the rest of this article).

So, with no direct evidence of any plot in the making to attack Australian shores, surely there is absolutely no reason to panic or take concise, direct action against ISIS by limiting our freedoms for national security, right?? Wrong!


Almost immediately after the terrorism threat was raised to high, a calculated effort of fear-induced manipulation and political trickery began a snowball effect that has dominated our lives for the past month in Australia:

Based on the timeline above, and more so the rapid pace of each unfolding piece of the puzzle, any person who believes the mainstream media would be absolutely terrified of a domestic threat in Australia. In fact, we have covered extensively on this site the effect of media discourse and fear on public perception, and how the media use fear as a tool to manipulate public opinion.

However, when you quickly analyse each and every link shown above, it is increasingly evident that almost every justified response to an event or occurrence has absolutely no merit and is entirely based upon a fear-mongering, agenda-driven media campaign.

Why are we supposed to believe that ”chatter” is a logical response to increased security at Parliament House?? Why are the media not telling us about how 14 of 15 individuals raided were released with no charge??

Why are we supposed to be afraid that “anyone with an iPhone, a knife and a victim” can be a terrorist, Mr. Abbott?? Why do we have to shift the balance between freedom and security for?? Are our authorities not capable of doing their job??

Why are we supposed to believe a government and media collective that LIED to us about WMDs in Iraq??

How are we, as Australians, allowing a police and surveillance state to be completely rolled out based on a rubbish political spin??



Fear is a powerful emotion. When people are afraid, they react. Impact of danger on emotions and the distortion effect of fear on subjective beliefs and individual choices can have a lasting effect on a person.

Not surprisingly, sociologists have come to identify our mediated knowledge of high-consequence risks as a major source of contemporary anxiety, and the establishment continues to take advantage of this to push their own personal agenda.

Despite the overwhelming evidence countering the induced-notion of fear of ISIS in Australia, the media and political establishment will have you believe that a terrorist is around every corner, forcing the public to respond based on emotion, rather than of rational thinking.

After it was estimated to cost $500 million per year to conduct the latest ‘mission’ in Iraq, and after giving a $630 million boost to intelligence organisations to protect us from the boogeyman, it has now been announced that further budget cuts will have to be made to pay for both ‘security and defense purposes’.

Indeed, it is not hard to see how the entire landscape of Australia has quickly shifted based solely upon hearsay threats and loosely-justified pieces of poorly constructed evidence. The utter manipulation of public opinion to serve an agenda-based declaration to commit once again in Iraq, coupled with the systematic erosion of our freedoms domestically, have been supported out of fear, rather than rational thinking.

As a result of this onslaught of propaganda, a triple threat of legislative pieces are currently in the process of passing through our Parliament in the name of ‘national security’.

Let’s take a look at just what these amendments entail, and analyse whether or not the politicians in Canberra are genuinely concerned about protecting us from these supposed external and domestic threats.


The first Bill passed the House of Representatives on Wednesday after overwhelmingly passing through the Senate floor the prior Thursday (42-12 vote). Through this, the ASIO Act and the IS Act have now both been amended to include a rapid-expansion of powers for Australian intelligence organisations:

The National Security Legislation Amendment (No. 1) Bill 2014 amends the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979 (the ASIO Act) and the Intelligence Services Act 2001 (the IS Act) to implement the Government’s response to recommendations in Chapter 4 of the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security’s (PJCIS) Report of the Inquiry into Potential Reforms of Australia’s National Security Legislation (tabled in June 2013) relating to reforms of the legislation governing the Australian Intelligence Community.

This has set an unimaginable precedent for the suppression of free speech in Australia, spying capabilities and expanded immunity of accountability for intelligence agencies conducting specific operations. Here is what the Bill contains:

  • It allows ASIO to longer be capped on the number of devices they can monitor under a single warrant, as previously was the case with such operations in Australia. This has raised major concerns, especially with the broadened scope of monitoring a computer under any particular operation. For the purpose of a computer-access warrant, a ‘computer’ is now defined as a ‘network’ – which can allow ASIO to monitor the entire Australian internet with a single warrant.
  • It allows Australian intelligence organisations and other third parties associates the ability to define a selective activity as a ‘Special Intelligence Operation’. In doing so, any operation that is conducted under the guide of an SIO definition, allows the organisation to be exempt from civil and criminal liability in the process of conducting them. This is a broad and dangerous term, because not only is it at the discretion of the Attorney General to approve and define an SIO – it also spans to any contractors, associates, black project workers and many more.
  • Furthermore, it introduces five-year penalties for journalists and whistleblowers (potentially ten-years if it ‘hurts the safety or security of the public’) for the disclosure of information about Special Intelligence Operations. This is a major concern, because it has the potential to eliminate national security reporting in this country.

The union representing journalists, the Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance, is concerned journalists may become liable for committing a criminal offence for publishing stories such as the alleged tapping of phones in Indonesia by intelligence agencies and Edward Snowden-style revelations about intelligence gathering. There are fears there will be a “chilling effect” on reporting about national security operations.

Despite the concern, there was no concerted campaign, no unified push by the media to stop this bill, which dramatically expands the powers of intelligence agencies whilst creating new offences for disclosing information about their operations. The Bill overwhelmingly passed the Senate and House of Representatives – with only a hand-full of politicians raising their concerns over the threat it causes to the very fabric of our free and open society.


No doubt, the passing of The National Security Amendment (No.1) Bill 2014 is a dark step in Australian history, and one every single individual in Australia should be deeply concerned about. However, whilst many remain oblivious to the legislation or in utter shock of it being passed overwhelmingly in the respective levels of Parliament – this is only just the beginning in a cycle of amendments to come.

On the 24th of September, Attorney-General George Brandis introduced the Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment (Foreign Fighters) Bill to the Senate, which is currently being referred to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security for review.

This second Bill is focused on individuals who either travel to or from conflict zones that are suspected in partaking in hostile activities, or people who support or plan terrorist/hostile activities domestically at home. It is an expansion to the 2005 Howard-era preventive detention and control order regimes, which are seen as highly controversial because they allow people to be subject to police restrictions or detention without charge and with limited judicial oversight.

Preventive detention orders allow a person to be detained without charge for up to 14 days. Control orders can restrict a person’s freedom of movement or their associations for much longer. The new amendments seeks to make it easier for officers to allow both preventive detention and control orders, whilst expanding on some of the penalties associated with the original legislation.

Some of the key points include:

  • Retaining the current regime of control orders and preventive detention orders, which were due to expire next year.
  • The Bill introduces the offence ‘advocating terrorism’. A person commits an offence if they intentionally counsel, promote, encourage or urge the doing of a terrorist Act or the commission of a terrorism offence. The offence carries a maximum penalty of 5 years imprisonment.
  • Broadening the range of circumstances where control orders can be sought, including restricting the movement or associations people who have been involved in foreign incursions and return to Australia.
  • Enforcing a “12-hour curfew” period for control orders that can force people to stay in a given location for a maximum of 12 hours in every 24 hours.
  • Making it easier for police to apply for a preventive detention order or interim control order by lowering the threshold for their state of mind from a “belief” to a “suspicion”.
  • Allowing preventive detention orders to be made verbally or electronically in urgent circumstances, and even to be made subject to a person when their full name is not known.
  • An area will be declared where the Foreign Affairs Minister is satisfied that a terrorist organisation listed under the Criminal Code is engaging in a hostile activity in a particular area of the foreign country. The new offence will enable the prosecution of people who intentionally enter an area in a foreign State where they know, or should know, that the Australian Government has determined that terrorist organisations are engaging in hostile activities.

The major concern with this Bill is the fact that all restrictions imposed under this legislation are to anyone suspected of ‘advocating terrorism’ – a very broad term that could potentially target anyone who questions the system. If you have already watched David Cameron’s speech at the United Nations, you will already know the type of “non-violent extremism” that some in the international community are now classifying in direct correlation to terrorist ideologies.

This is troubling to some who feel the amendment could potentially lead to a greater erosion of our freedoms; freedoms to support world views alternative to the official narrative or pre-conceived notion of public programming. Indeed, as with most legislative texts, the broadened language constructs do allow potential loopholes to be abused – and, with the new ability to arrest individuals easier and easier – the concerns are certainly justified.


For those that have followed TOTT News for a number of years now, you will understand that we have followed the ‘Data Retention’ proposals from their inception in mid-2012 until now. For a long time, it seems as though the proposals were likely to be resurrected after originally being rejected by the Parliamentary Committee examining the reforms – and, as expected – and now back are set to be introduced later in the year.

As previously covered on this website, the new Bills set will seek to introduce a mandatory data retention scheme, where telecommunications and internet providers will be required to retain personal data for two years.

Australia already allows warrantless access to this type of data, which has raised serious concerns about protecting journalists and has been grossly misused throughout the years, as over 250,000 requests were made in 2012 without justification.

The retention of metadata is troubling to some due to the extremely easy nature of obtaining the information, and the concern of how such data is being shared and used in Australia and abroad.

It was revealed during the Edward Snowden leaks in 2012 that Australia is part of the ‘Five Eyes Alliance‘ (a relationship Abbott defends), including Australia, the United States, Canada, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. Through this, intelligence agencies gather and share information about citizens across an international collaborative network.

The first disclosure of Australian involvement in US global surveillance identified four facilities in the country that contribute to a key American intelligence collection program: The US-Australian Joint Defence Facility at Pine Gap near Alice Springs and three Australian Signals Directorate facilities: the Shoal Bay Receiving Station near Darwin, the Australian Defence Satellite Communications Facility at Geraldton and the Naval Communications Station HMAS Harman outside Canberra.

These facilities, among others, contribute to the NSA’s collection program codenamed X-Keyscore.

Furthermore, it was also revealed that the Australian government has been building another state-of-the art, secret data storage facility just outside Canberra to enable intelligence agencies to deal with a “data deluge”  siphoned from the internet and global telecommunications networks.

Many civil liberties groups, organisations and individuals around the country have voiced their concern over the warrantless collection of our metadata by government agencies, and say this new series of amendments are an even darker step in a world of covert information gathering in Australia.


In the end, fear and anger are the ultimate reductivists. When we feel afraid of becoming victims of evil, it becomes difficult to look beyond what it is that threatens us. It is human nature to want to protect the loved ones around us, and when danger arises, people want to know about. The media and government have capitalised on this, using auditory queues, linguistic patterns, and segment cliffhangers in their programming in order to entice people to stay attentive and afraid.

Through this, the media will use any means necessary to make sure that such a goal is regularly fulfilled – even if it means giving an inaccurate representation of the truth. The media’s willingness to sensationalise topics continues to produce a discourse of fear, while the pervasive communication generates an expectation that danger and risk is a central feature of everyday life. Through this, people will no longer react out of rational thinking a logic analysis.

Australia is now at a cross-roads; we are staring down the road of tyranny and enslavement. Our rights and freedoms are systematically being taken away with each passing day, and soon, the free country that we once knew and loved will be replaced by a creeping state of Orwellian qualities. We are in control of our destiny and we have the power to stop this. One can make the conscious decision to stand up and fight for what little freedom we have left, or sit back and wait for the inevitable fate that awaits us.

Stand up, Australia – before it’s too late.


For more TOTT News, SUBSCRIBE to the website on the right hand panel for FREE and follow us on social media for more exclusive content:

Facebook — Facebook.com/TOTTNews
YouTube — YouTube.com/TOTTNews
Instagram — Instagram.com/TOTTNews
Twitter — Twitter.com/EthanTOTT


Remember WMD? Just labelling something ‘terrorism’ isn’t enough: crickey.com.au

Australia’s Prime Minister gives a master class in exploiting terrorism fears to seize new powers: firstlook.org

Erosion of Privacy in Australia – Basic facts you need to know: tottnews.com

Brandis rebuffs questions on surveillance laws…again!: youtube.com

National security laws ‘strike at the heart of press freedom’: theguardian.com

Counter-terrorism raids – five unanswered questions: theguardian.com

Analysing Mass Media – Fear and Manipulation: tottnews.com


Listen to Ethan and John le Bon discuss the new legislation in detail on Episode #01 of the Australian Roundtable Podcast on October 5th, 2014 below.

The Australian Roundtable Podcast is a Brisbane-based, independent news/analysis/discussion panel podcast which broadcasts live every Sunday from 3pm AEST. The show features an eclectic panel of presenters who come together each week to discuss recent and topical news and current affairs from Australia and around the world.

The show provides an alternative perspective to that presented by the mainstream media, and is aimed at listeners in Australia and abroad who are skeptical of the official narratives being pushed by governments and the corporate, controlled news.

SUBSCRIBE: http://www.YouTube.com/AustralianRoundtable
Also found at: http://www.AusRoundtable.com
MP3 Archive: http://AustralianRoundtable.podbean.com


62 comments on “Fall of Australia: An overview of ‘anti-terrorism’ legislation”

  1. An excellent, timely article. Sadly, people are uninformed and hardly capable of formulating questions when freedoms are removed or anything untoward happening around them. How many understand the Hegelian tactic of mass manipulation, for instance? (thesis-antithesis-synthesis). Due to television and iphones, we have become passive downloaders of whatever information is fed to us by the powers that be. Welcome to the New World Order.

  2. You’re so cool! I don’t believe I’ve read through a
    single thing like that before. So wonderful to find somebody with a few unique thoughts on this subject matter.
    Seriously.. thank you for starting this up. This website is
    something that is needed on the web, someone with a bit of originality!

    1. Descent is obvious by lowered level of politicians and prime ministers and their sxink into imitations and falsehood. Gillard and Abbot. Others have only big worries every day about gay marriages. Homosexuals are able to create only nothing just follow to copy christian tradition instead celebrate that their way. Why is ms. Pilbersek politician , when she went berserk about somebody mariage.. Iis not problem for politician to solve. If it is means they do not see deep problems Australia faces they so so take Australia into faeces. E.John adopted child. When other people fill for adoption they must be healthy , good citizen, iand everything right even age etc. Elton John thus adopted grand grand because he is about 70 y. of age so unqualified for to be granted it. Further he had tried suicides several time.

    People fail to realize the connection between the fear generators and the profit thieves. An economy built on competition for survival resources AND a Money-Print-Loan (MPL) scam is destined to fail eventually. Check it out!… Print money, loan it out. All money in circulation is out on loan! ALL OF IT. Just because you build something and pass the debt on is a fake win because you were paid with borrowed money – that is, all money in circulation is “loaned in” so each dollar you see does have an original “loaned out” date (not printed on its face).
    IT’S LIKE A SINKHOLE READY TO HAPPEN. The total money in circulation must be repaid. The game the typical person plays is “pass the debt like hot potato” but that is the game within the larger game of “GIVE IT ALL BACK WITH INTEREST OR WE WILL TAKE EVERYTHING”. As the money is being repaid, more must be loaned out to replace what is out of the “circulation of dependency”.
    The MPL scam, running out of loans to make, then… BEGS FOR A WAR because ruination is just another scam for MPL scammers to print to make loans.
    YOU NEED TO SEE THIS PICTURE because it is the reality that drives the FEAR GAME that the MPL scammers need to keep running their scam on the population!

    SOLUTION? 3 separately ruled economies. 1] life support 2] comfort 3] luxury
    Real simple. Right now, the thieving wealthers are mining the middle class by depriving everyone of life support. That is evil.

  4. Great article mate. There is growing awareness of the corporate agenda eroding our personal freedoms. In qld were working to build a network of people who can unite and offer an alternative to the major two party sell outs. You see the govt tried to factionalise bikies, then took out car manufacturing (largest workers union in aust.). All in a bid to further disempower alternative movements. However we are fighting back. Were working towards a united independents party, where single issue parties can unite on 3 basic principles; a bill of rights for all australians, free educationhl and health services, and no sale of resources and assetts to multinational corporations.

    We are reclaiming our rights. If this interests you please get in touch. Im sure your network would be very handy. And were trying to pul in as many as possible before the next election

    .thanks for your journalism. Blake blaksea@gmail.com

  5. Great article. Increasingly people are becoming more aware of the corporate agenda eroding our rights and freedoms. I qld were working to create a unified alternative of independent parlimentarians. Aka the united independents party.

    You see the two party sell out system has fractionalised their opponents (bikie laws, forced collapse of aust car manufacturing which had largest union representation).

    So were banding together single issue fighters and independents under 3 main concepts; bill of rights for all aussies, free education and health, no sale of assetts and reaources to transnationals corporations.

    If this interests you get in touch. blaksea@gmail.com

  6. I’m not that much of a online reader to be honest but
    your sites really nice, keep it up! I’ll go ahead
    and bookmark your website to come back in the future.
    All the best

  7. I would like to thank you for the efforts you’ve put in penning this site.
    I really hope to view the same high-grade content by you in the future as well.
    In fact, your creative writing abilities has motivated me to get my own, personal website now

  8. I’m not sure where you are getting your information, but great topic.
    I needs to spend some time learning much more or understanding
    more. Thanks for great information I was looking for this
    info for my mission.

  9. Do you mind if I quote a couple of your articles as long as I provide credit and sources back to your website?
    My blog site is in the very same niche as yours and my users would
    certainly benefit from a lot of the information you present
    here. Please let me know if this alright with you. Regards!

  10. Very nice post. I simply stumbled upon your blog and wished to
    say that I’ve truly loved surfing around your weblog posts.
    After all I’ll be subscribing in your rss feed and I am hoping you write
    again soon!

  11. Good day! This post couldn’t be written any better! Reading through this post reminds me of my good old room
    mate! He always kept chatting about this. I will forward this article to him. Fairly certain he will have a good read. Thank you for sharing!

  12. Good day I am so thrilled I found your blog page, I really found you by accident, while I was searching on Bing for something else, Anyways I am here now and would just like to say thanks a lot for a incredible post and a all round exciting blog (I also love the theme/design), I don’t have time to read through it all at the moment but I have bookmarked it and also added in your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read much more, Please do keep up the superb job.

  13. Fantastic goods from you, man. I’ve understand your stuff previous to and you’re just extremely wonderful.

    I really like what you have acquired here, really like what you’re saying and
    the way in which you say it. You make it enjoyable
    and you still care for to keep it wise. I can’t wait to read much more from you.
    This is really a tremendous site.

  14. Thanks for the sensible critique. Me & my neighbor were just preparing to do some research about this. We got a grab a book from our local library but I think I learned more from this post. I am very glad to see such excellent information being shared freely out there.

  15. Reblogged this on The GOLDEN RULE and commented:

    The Australian Government has now called for another overhaul on 05/10/17 and we will keep readers updated on details as they are formally released before parliament.

    Visit our Intelligence archive to stay up-to-date with new articles and developments on the subject. ”
    A balanced viewpoint on Australia’s need for strong anti-terror laws and the under-lying agenda to reduce citizens’ freedoms. It’s a serious issue.

  16. ‘Intelligence’? If ever there was an example of an Oxymoron!
    As for ‘Terrorism’, By ‘Straight Definition’,- (GET a ‘Plain English’ Dictionary)
    “Person or Persons who use Bombing, Kidnapping or Murder to change Government Policy.” – Full Stop. NO Nominated Country, Race, Creed, Gender involved!
    ALL of the ‘Allies of the Willing’, Including THE Australian GovernmentS involved in Vietnam, IRAQ, Libya, Syria – & on! This includes ‘Internal’ False Flag ‘Events’!!
    ALL, please take your Collective places in ‘THE Dock’!
    OOH! Got a big Black spot for that one!
    Wellness to All – Except the ‘Actors’.

Leave a Reply to Nydia Cancel reply