Discussion: Questions with the Port Arthur narrative

The Port Arthur Massacre, described as an “indelible part of Australian history”, is an event that resulted in international media coverage, unprecedented national debate and the introduction of strict firearms laws across the country.

On the latest episode of the General Knowledge Podcast, Ethan Nash from TOTT News and General Maddox from Real News Australia are joined by Paul Moder, to discuss questions with the official story, gun control, plans with the movie and much more.

7 comments
Questions still remain years later. Photo: Supplied.

The Port Arthur Massacre, described as an “indelible part of Australian history”, is an event that resulted in international media coverage, unprecedented national debate and the introduction of strict firearms laws across the country.

Over 20 years later, numerous inconsistencies with the Port Arthur narrative remain unanswered.

On the latest episode of the General Knowledge Podcast, Ethan Nash from TOTT News and General Maddox from Real News Australia are joined by Paul Moder, from the upcoming film WASP – The Port Arthur Massacre, to discuss questions with the official story, gun control and aftermath, plans with the movie and much more.

LISTEN NOW!

HERE:

https://realnewsaustralia.podbean.com/e/general-knowledge-podcast-ep-14-port-arthur-massacre/

Available on iTunes and Podbean!

For more episodes, please visit https://RealNewsAustralia.Podbean.com

You can also listen to our podcasts on our Podcasts tab and Podcast Archive page!


Support Paul’s upcoming film at the link below!

WASP – The Port Arthur Massacre

“The face of an angel. The mind of a child. The act of a monster.”


RELATED CONTENT

Bryant’s cut and perm
By our very own Full Member and friend Lindsay ‘The Silverfox’

Port Arthur cracks | Lindsay ‘The Silverfox’

The truth about gun control in Australia | TOTT News

Overview: Port Arthur Massacre | National Museum of Australia

Australia’s Place in the New World Order – Part I | TOTT News


FOLLOW US

For more TOTT News, SUBSCRIBE to the website for FREE and follow us on social media for more exclusive content:

Facebook — Facebook.com/TOTTNews

YouTube — YouTube.com/TOTTNews

Instagram — Instagram.com/TOTTNews

Twitter — Twitter.com/EthanTOTT



7 comments on “Discussion: Questions with the Port Arthur narrative”

  1. Great interview, we have to keep pushing & be a thorn in the side of the system behind all of this because the Australian mainstream media are utterly pathetic.

  2. MSM and government narratives are silent weapons for quiet wars since the 1950s. We are all pawns (military and civilian) all expendable in the Illuminati game.
    Anyone who watched the live media coverage at the time (1996) and was aware of the political deceit lead up, knows that this was a Government Psychological Operation to disarm the Australian population. Martin was the perfect patsy. The Australian government is guilty of mass murder, it’s not the first time and won’t be the last. Joint operation CIA, MI6, Mossad, ASIO and the Australian SASR. The MK special operator (shooter 1) gave the game away in a recorded phone conversation dropping the operation name JAMIE. ‘Jamie’ is not shooter 1’s name nor did he make it up on the spot, he was dropping the code name to be clever in his MK state.
    JAMIE of Hebrew origin meaning “to supplant”, “the supplanter”. Meaning:To take the place of or substitute for (another):replace.To usurp the place of, especially through intrigue or underhanded tactics.To trip up, as the heels.To overthrow; cause the downfall of; destroy; uproot.To remove; displace; drive or force away.To displace and take the place of, especially (of persons) by scheming or strategy. To remove or displace by stratagem; to displace and take the place of; to supersede. To overthrow, undermine, or force away, in order to get a substitute in place of. To take the place of; to replace, to supersede. To uproot, to remove-violently.
    What was the role of the Australian SASR in Operation JAMIE04281996 ? Their job was eliminate the terrorists. We could ask those who took part, but they were silenced shortly after the Port Arthur incident in a helicopter crash remember the MSM and gov narrative before any investigation (1996) “tragic accident” (another government mass murder and coverup). SAS troopers do their jobs, the MK shooters that day at Port Arthur didn’t live to tell any stories. So how much did the SAS troopers selected for the Port Arthur Operation know? The troopers selected knew enough to be seen as a threat and the Australian government murdered 18 of our best in a Black Hawk helicopter incident to prevent any knowledge being leaked. The big question here is – how much did Special Operations HQ know?

  3. For those that aren’t keeping up with the advanced weapons systems used by the deep state intel services – electromagnetic weapons systems have been used extensively in assassinations (accidental deaths) since the 1970s for example in 1996 following Operation JAMIE04281996 (MSM narrative Port Arthur Massacre, Tasmania, Australia) a DEW was used to target the flight crew of an Army helicopter in Operation BLACKOUT06121996 (MSM narrative Tragic Black Hawk Helicopter collision Townsville, Australia). Question everything.

Leave a Reply